Wednesday, November 30, 2005

Ukraine, EU Must Do More For Migrants - Rights Group

KIEV, Ukraine -- Ukraine and the European Union must do more to improve conditions for migrants and asylum seekers detained in the former Soviet republic, a human rights group said on Wednesday.

Ukrainian border guards are rewarded with medals and holidays for arresting illegal migrants attempting to leave Ukraine for the European Union

A Human Rights Watch report said visits to detention centres and interviews with refugees had revealed migrants were being denied access to lawyers and contacts with family, and subjected to beatings, harassment and other maltreatment.

It blamed a lack of funds, inadequate legislation and a failure by Ukrainian authorities to enforce regulations.

"This is a matter that the Ukrainian government needs to address. It is also a matter for the EU to address," London Human Rights Watch director Steve Crawshaw told a news conference.

"It cannot simply wash its hands of the matter. At the moment, there is too great a readiness to say this is a problem that Ukraine must deal with and there it ends."

Kiev authorities had to "intervene and send a clear signal of what is and what is not acceptable. Sending that signal strongly is one of the important changes we are looking for."

Human Rights Watch issued its report to coincide with Thursday's summit between the EU and Ukraine's liberal administration elected after last year's "Orange Revolution" protests.

The report said EU expansion to Ukraine's borders last year had put additional pressure on Kiev and put at 500,000 the estimated number of migrants in the country.

Migrants were pouring in from Iran, Iraq, Palestinian territories and elsewhere in addition to earlier arrivals from troubled parts of former Soviet states.

Some had fled persecution and were unable to claim asylum, while others were trying to reach EU states.

The report's author, Romanita Iordache, said the ordeal of 150 refugees interviewed during the investigation "are not isolated cases. We documented a pattern".

"We documented abuses and problems created not only because of a lack of funding but because Ukrainian legislation is not being implemented or does not comply ... with international standards."

More resources, she said, were needed to improve conditions. "But in order to observe Ukrainian legislation and treat people decently there is no need for resources," she said. "There's no need for a bigger budget if you don't want to beat detainees."

Iordache said Human Rights Watch hoped the Ukrainian government would acknowledge the extent of the problem.

Source: Reuters

Bookmark and Share

Orange Coalition Crumbles Ahead of Polls

KIEV, Ukraine -- The Orange Revolution team that swept Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko into power a year ago enters the 2006 parliamentary election campaign -- officially underway since November 26 -- divided into several small teams. Most of them will be competing for the same pro-reform, pro-Western electorate.

Ex-PM Yulia Tymoshenko - Iron Lady of the Orange Revolution

This may make the March 26 parliamentary polls an easy ride for the main opposition force -- the Party of Regions of presidential election loser Viktor Yanukovych, the undisputed leader of recent public opinion polls.

As there is no longer a strong common enemy, which a year ago was the corrupt regime of then-President Leonid Kuchma, ideological differences have come to the fore, preventing Orange reunification for next year's polls. The far left wing of the government team -- the Socialists -- have never concealed that they would run in the polls alone. It has proved impossible to reintegrate populist former prime minister Yulia Tymoshenko back into Yushchenko's team.

Yushchenko has managed to gather under his wing the largest bloc of parties so far, but two key right-of-center parties -- the Popular Party and Reforms and Order -- refused to join his bloc. The radical youth party Pora, one of the symbols of the Orange Revolution, has not joined either Yushchenko or Tymoshenko.

On November 25, six pro-government parties signed an agreement reviving Yushchenko's motley "Our Ukraine" bloc. Our Ukraine won the 2002 parliamentary elections, but its character was different – it was bigger and in the opposition. The present-day Our Ukraine unites Yushchenko's People's Union-Our Ukraine party, Foreign Minister Borys Tarasyuk's People's Movement, National Security and Defense Council Secretary Anatoly Kinakh's Industrialists and Entrepreneurs Party, Naftohaz state-controlled oil and gas company chief Oleksiy Ivchenko's Congress of Ukrainian Nationalists, the Christian Democratic Union, and the Sobor Ukrainian Republican Party.

Sobor is a good example of how painful the rift between the supporters of Yushchenko and Tymoshenko may be. Sobor, an ethnocentric conservative party, has been part of Tymoshenko's team since 2001. But this past September, when Yushchenko fired Tymoshenko as prime minister, Sobor leader Anatoly Matvienko -- and probably the majority of the party's grassroots -- started to drift toward Yushchenko's camp.

The party's representatives in parliament, however, have stayed with Tymoshenko, and they elected veteran radical nationalist and Soviet-era dissident Levko Lukyanenko as their leader. Matvienko has accused Tymoshenko of splitting his party.

Lukyanenko's team will most probably join the Yulia Tymoshenko bloc. But the bloc itself has not yet been formed. This was expected to happen on November 26, when Tymoshenko's Fatherland party and the liberal Reforms and Order (RiP) group held their congresses. But RiP refused to join Tymoshenko's bloc on her terms, which included having RiP leader Viktor Pynzenyk resign from the post of finance minister and putting Fatherland members at the top of the joint lists for national and regional elections.

Tymoshenko also refused to back a RiP candidate for the post of Lviv city mayor. RiP decided not to burn bridges and continued talks with Tymoshenko. But Kommersant-Ukrayina reported that RiP is seriously studying other options, including separate participation in the campaign or forming a bloc with Pora.

Unlike Yushchenko, Tymoshenko apparently does not strive to gather as many parties as possible under her umbrella. Her main currency is her own popular name. Only one party, apart from her own Fatherland, has so far joined Tymoshenko's bloc. This is the obscure Social Democratic Party (not to be confused with the United Social Democrats of Viktor Medvedchuk).

United Ukraine, a party without a clearly defined ideology led by Bohdan Hubsky, a former ally and business partner of Medvedchuk, decided at its congress on November 26 to join Tymoshenko's bloc. But it is not yet clear whether it will be admitted, and on what conditions.

Only one thing is clear about Tymoshenko -- there will be no grand coalition between her and Yushchenko for the polls. This possibility exists only in theory, as the law gives parties and blocs until the end of December to compile lists for the election. But, speaking to the Russian Ekho Moskvy radio, Tymoshenko said she did not see any sense in unification with Yushchenko.

She did not rule out cooperation with Our Ukraine after the election, when she said her bloc would compete with Yanukovych to form the majority in parliament.

The far-right wing of the Orange team -- the nationalist Popular Party of Yuriy Kostenko -- is going to compete in the polls against both Yushchenko and Tymoshenko. Differences with the former partners are of an ideological nature, as none of them are really center-right parties, Kostenko told his party congress on November 27.

"Our mission is to give Ukrainian patriots a political force that stands on national positions," he said. Among his allies, Kostenko named the radical nationalist Prosvita and the Congress of Ukrainian Intelligentsia, as well as Cossack and veterans organizations.

Source: Eurasia Daily Monitor

Bookmark and Share

Drug Use Fuels HIV Epidemic in Ukraine

KIEV, Ukraine -- Vitaly became HIV-positive by injecting drugs with a contaminated needle -- the method that's fuelling a veritable HIV epidemic in Ukraine, estimated to be Europe's worst-affected country.

HIV-positive children at an orphanage in Odessa, Ukraine

The 29-year-old, who has been HIV-positive for five years, was aware that he could get infected by using unclean needles, but the urge to get high was just too strong.

"I knew that you can get infected through a syringe, but a person who is chemically dependent sets different priorities in life," he told AFP. "First comes the satisfaction, then comes everything else."

Drug use and unprotected sex are driving an HIV epidemic in Ukraine, where an estimated 1.4 percent of the adult population is infected -- the worst-affected country in Europe, according to a recent UNAIDS report.

"Fuelled by unsafe injecting drug use and unprotected sex, its epidemic shows no signs of abating," the report said.

Although official figures show some 85,000 HIV-positives in Ukraine, the UN estimates the number to be around 360,000.

In addition to health problems, those infected face enormous problems in a country where HIV and AIDS are seen as a disease of "addicts and prostitutes," and where ignorance of the illness and fear of transmission reach deep into all levels of society.

Vitaly, for example, once lay on an operating table waiting to get a boil removed, when hospital staff opened his chart and saw that he was HIV-positive. He was suddenly told that he needed to go to another clinic because removing boils was not that hospital's specialty.

"It sounded disingenous to say the least," Vitaly said. "I was already on the operating table, waiting for the nurse... and then I had to get up, put my clothes back on. I was shaking inside."

Another was when his parents set aside separate plateware for him to eat from.

"It hurt, because HIV is not transmitted in that way," he said.

The attitude that HIV only affects society's "untouchables" helps fuel the epidemic, as many people do not use contraception because they feel they are not at risk, analysts say.

Although slowly Ukrainians are becoming more tolerant of their countrymen who are HIV-positive, cases of HIV-positive children being refused admission to schools are not uncommon, said Vitaly, who today works at "Network for Those Living with HIV," a national non-governmental organization.

"The situation was worse five years ago, but even today it is not sufficiently good," he said.

Several UN-sponsored programs have been launched in Ukraine to help fight the disease, notably syringe exchanges among drug addicts, but experts say that they cover only about 10 percent of the nation's estimated 560,000 intravenous drug users, the UNAIDS report said.

Such programs are also hampered by government initiatives that aim to crack down on drug trafficking, but that end up penalizing drug users who use syringe exchange programs, analysts say.

"One must on the contrary raise the threshold of what doses would be criminal to own... as world practice shows an improvement in epidemics" when drug users do not have to fear criminal prosecution, said Vitaly Yanyuk, an official with the HIV-AIDS Alliance in Ukraine.

The government of President Viktor Yushchenko, who assumed power in late January and has called HIV a "global problem" for Ukraine, has begun to be more active in dealing with the problem of HIV/AIDS.

The Ukrainian leader recently met with HIV-positives, has pledged to pay "particular attention" to the problem, and announced that four national programs aimed at fighting the disease would be launched in 2006.

Vitaly for his part, is thankful that he became infected.

"I am thankful that HIV has appeared in my life because it motivated me to quit drugs and fundamentally change my life," he said. "A person who has faced death... values life more."

"That's not a recipe -- get infected and everything will improve. But in my case, that is exactly what happened."

Source: AFP

Bookmark and Share

An Alleged Nazi Guard Fights to Stay in US

CLEVELAND, OH -- Returning an Ohio man accused of being a Nazi concentration camp guard to his native Ukraine would be like throwing him "into a shark tank," his lawyer argued in court yesterday.

John Demjanjuk, an 85-year-old retired autoworker, has been fighting for nearly 30 years to stay in this country, and his lawyer, John Broadley, said he should not be deported to Ukraine because he could face torture there.

But the Justice Department said Demjanjuk has not shown he would be mistreated.

Demjanjuk lost his US citizenship after a judge ruled in 2002 that documents from World War II prove he was a Nazi guard at various death or forced labor camps.

Yesterday's hearing in front of an immigration judge was part of a process for determining whether he will be deported.

The United States first tried to deport Demjanjuk in 1977, accusing him of being a notorious guard known as Ivan the Terrible at the Treblinka concentration camp.

Demjanjuk was extradited to Israel, convicted, and sentenced to hang, but the Israeli Supreme Court found that someone else apparently was Ivan.

Demjanjuk returned to the United States. His US citizenship was restored before being revoked again in 2002.

The current case is based on evidence uncovered by the Justice Department alleging he was a different guard. Demjanjuk has denied the allegations.

Broadley said the US government never sufficiently disavowed its previous contention that Demjanjuk was Ivan, and Demjanjuk fears he will be tortured if he returns to Ukraine.

"We have a situation the US government created, and now he still carries a blood scent of Ivan the Terrible, and this would be like throwing him with that blood scent into a shark tank," Broadley said.

The Justice Department has suggested that the judge consider deporting Demjanjuk to Ukraine, Poland, or Germany. Broadley said there is no indication another country would be willing to accept him.

The judge is expected to issue a decision within 30 days.

Source: AP

Bookmark and Share

Russia Warns Ukraine Joining NATO Could End Military Cooperation

MOSCOW, Russia -- Russian Deputy Prime Minister and Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov warned on Tuesday that the country could halt military cooperation with Ukraine if it joins NATO.

Russian Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov

Speaking to reporters after his talks with his Ukrainian counterpart Anatoliy Gritsenko, Ivanov said Ukraine's possible entry into NATO may have a number of consequences, including Russia's decision to stop bilateral military-technical cooperation.

"This may happen. I suppose so," Ivanov was quoted by the Itar-Tass news agency as saying.

The Russian defense chief stressed that was only "one of the consequences" of Ukraine's possible accession to NATO and that other consequences include border issues.

Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko has made NATO membership a top goal of his country but the military bloc has shunned questions about when it might offer membership to this nation.

The accession to a military organization is a sovereign right of each country but any state also has a right to choose military-technical cooperation partners, Ivanov said.

During Gritsenko's visit to Moscow, he and Ivanov signed a military cooperation plan for 2006 and a cooperation agreement on providing flight safety for governmental aircraft.

Source: Xinhua

Bookmark and Share

Ukraine to Get EU Market-Economy Status

KIEV, Ukraine -- Ukraine is set to win European Union recognition as a market economy, a British government spokesman said Tuesday, a move that would help ease its integration into the West and make it easier for the country to trade with the Union, especially in steel, of which Ukraine is a large producer.

Ukraine aspires to become a member of the EU

Tony Blair, the British prime minister and holder of the Union's rotating presidency, will announce the plan at a summit meeting on Dec. 1 in the Ukrainian capital, Kiev, said Jonathan Allen, a British government spokesman in Brussels.

The remarks came as President Viktor Yushchenko pledged to speed up privatizations and reform energy and other markets to stimulate trade and economic growth.

"We would like to mark 2006 with a series of concrete structural reforms," he said at a conference attended by foreign investors. "We all understand that without change Ukraine cannot move forward and that goes for both the economic and social sectors."

Market-economy status would signal greater European trust in Ukraine by ensuring that the Union used Ukrainian data for trade inquiries affecting the country. The Union uses other nations' figures to calculate "antidumping" levies against Ukraine.

EU antidumping duties, designed to protect companies in the 25-nation bloc from lower-priced imports, cost Ukraine €200 million to €300 million a year, or $234 million to $256 million, Oleh Rybachuk, then Ukrainian vice prime minister and now state secretary, said in February.

Obtaining market-economy status is part of Ukrainian policy goals that also include starting talks on a free-trade zone with the Union, winning membership in the World Trade Organization and reorganizing the energy market.

The Ukrainian government had sought EU market-economy status in the first half of the year. The European Commission, the Union's trade authority, said the main obstacles were government price controls and legislation that prevented companies from going bankrupt.

The EU plan to grant such recognition is "on the basis of the commission's assurance that Ukraine meets the technical requirements for market-economy status," Allen said.

Yushchenko also confirmed on Tuesday that Ukraine had secured support from Kazakhstan to build a $6 billion pipeline to ship Caspian crude oil to Poland via Ukraine, increasing supplies to Europe after oil prices rose to a record this year.

Poland, Kazakhstan and Ukraine agreed to extend and expand an existing Ukrainian pipeline to link the Black Sea port of Odessa with the Gdansk terminal in Poland on the Baltic Sea, Yushchenko said. The partners could lift the oil link's capacity to 40 million tons a year, or 800,000 barrels a day.

"Ukraine will be reforming its energy sector because we want to integrate into Europe," Yushchenko said. "We have conducted all the talks and reached an agreement with Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Poland and Georgia."

Kazakhstan, which plans to almost triple oil output to 3.6 million barrels a day in 2015, is expanding its ports to reduce the former Soviet state's reliance on Russia as an export route.

Chevron's Tengizchevroil, Kazakhstan's biggest oil exporter, said Nov. 22 that it planned to send more crude oil across the Caspian to Azerbaijan as a planned increase in output would exceed the capacity of existing pipelines via Russia.

The oil would be shipped from Baku, the Azeri capital, to the Black Sea, via Georgia. The link could carry 10 million tons to 15 million tons of Kazakh oil in 2006, Yushchenko said.

Ukraine is seeking to reduce its economic dependence on Russia, which supplies most of the country's oil and gas, after President Vladimir Putin last year backed Yushchenko's opponent in contested elections.

Ukraine is in a dispute about gas imports with the Russian energy company Gazprom, which wants to triple the price Ukraine pays for its gas.

Gazprom, which supplies a quarter of Europe's natural gas, is concerned that Ukraine's refusal to agree on 2006 gas supply contracts could disrupt exports to countries like Germany and Italy, which are shipped through pipelines that cross Ukraine, Gazprom's deputy chief executive, Alexander Ryazanov, said Tuesday in Moscow.

The Ukrainian oil pipeline from Odessa to the western town of Brody stood idle for three years after its completion in 2001. The Ukrainian government had planned to ship crude oil through the link to Brody, where it joins the Druzhba pipeline from Russia to Germany. The pipeline had been idle until BP's Russian venture, TNK-BP, started using it last year to transport Russian oil in the opposite direction, to the Black Sea.

Source: International Herald Tribune

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, November 29, 2005

Corruption's Grip Eases in Ukraine

KIEV, Ukraine -- Viktor Kushner and about a dozen friends staged a rally at Kiev's city hall one day last week to protest what they call "corruption" in the sale of some public parkland to a private business.


This sort of demonstration is a regular sight on the streets of Kiev these days, though it was practically unheard of barely a year ago.

"The experience we had in the Orange Revolution last year showed that it's possible to change things by taking a stand," says Mr. Kushner, a public employee. "We've become freer, and we're learning to act like free people."

It's difficult to judge the issues involved in Kushner's specific complaint against city hall. But growing evidence suggests that one of Ukraine's worst scourges, corruption, may be receding in the face of heightened public awareness and postrevolutionary street activism.

Though the economic reforms promised by President Viktor Yushchenko have been slow to arrive, experts say significant numbers of businesses are leaving the shadow economy, more people are paying taxes, and fewer officials are taking bribes.

"There are very strong anti-corruption moods in society right now," director of the independent Institute of Global Strategy in Kiev. "The revolution was above all a moral event that changed public consciousness. Officials know they must tread carefully in this atmosphere."

The Berlin-based organization Transparency International, which annually rates the perception of corruption in 150 countries, this year notched Ukraine up to 113th place from last year's 122nd, putting it roughly on a par with Vietnam and Zambia.

Light shines into shadow economy

Government tax receipts rose by 30 percent in the first nine months of this year, despite a sharp economic slowdown, thanks to individuals and companies emerging from the shadows to pay their taxes.

In October, foreign investors received a heartening sign when one of Ukraine's biggest steel mills, Krivorizhstal, was "reprivatized" and bought at open auction by India's Mittal Steel Co. for $4.8 billion. The same company had been previously sold to the son-in-law of then President Leonid Kuchma for just $800 million.

"This was a signal to the whole society that times have changed," says Oleksander Chekmishov, deputy director of the Institute of Journalism in Kiev.

"It says that Ukraine is no longer a country of systemic corruption, in which a small elite linked to political power divided up most of the country's assets among themselves," he says.

Ukraine's improving performance, however slight, contrasts with the worsening perception of corruption in some of its post-Soviet neighbors.

Russia, which stands at No. 128 in Transparency International's table of 150 countries, has seen corruption levels soar hand in hand with the deepening authoritarianism of President Vladimir Putin's rule over the past five years.

For example, a recent survey by the independent InDem Foundation in Moscow, which tracks corruption in Russia, found that the average business bribe has grown by 13 times to $135,000 since Mr. Putin came to power.

In a TV address marking the first anniversary of the Orange Revolution last week, Yushchenko pledged to wage war on corruption.

"I am ordering the Cabinet to produce urgent bills to be put to parliament," including measures to prevent tampering with the judiciary, offering people a chance to declare past illegal incomes and new guarantees for property rights, he said.

Nevertheless, many Ukrainians, such as Kushner, appear to regard corruption as a bigger problem than ever in their country. "The whole system is dirty," he says. "Everything needs to be taken under public control."

One reason for the widespread distrust, experts say, is the acrimonious bickering that has broken out among the leaders of the victorious Orange coalition.

Last September, Yushchenko's chief of staff, Oleksander Zinchenko, resigned and accused several members of the president's inner circle of graft. In the political shock wave that followed, Yushchenko fired the entire government and one of his closest advisers, industrialist Pyotr Poroshenko.

Publicizing allegations

Another reason, some suggest, is that a freer post- revolutionary media has taken to airing allegations of official misconduct more thoroughly.

"In the past, the issue of high-level corruption was kept behind closed doors and seldom raised in the press," says Oleksander Shushko, director of the Center for Peace, Conversion and Foreign Policy, a Kiev think tank. "Now we hear about it every day on TV, so it seems like there's more of it."

The current feuding between the former leaders of the Orange Revolution, which largely takes the form of corruption accusations, could be a good thing for Ukraine's political growth, says Volodymyr Gorbach, an adviser to Pora, the radical student movement that intends to run candidates in parliamentary elections slated for next March.

"They have ensured that corruption will be a key issue in the election campaign, and that's good," he says. "It will help keep the momentum going so Ukraine can move into the next stage of deep democratic change."

Source: Christian Science Monitor

Bookmark and Share

Yushchenko's Party May Lose Ukraine Election as Economy Slows

KIEV, Ukraine -- A popular uprising known as the Orange Revolution swept Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko to power a year ago. A similar victory is unlikely for his party in parliamentary elections in March.

Viktor Yushchenko addressing "Our Ukraine" congress

Yushchenko's Our Ukraine Party has the backing of 12.4 percent of the voters, according to a Nov. 3-13 survey of 1,993 people by the Kiev-based Razumkov Center. The poll had a margin of error of 2.3 percent. Yushchenko is lagging behind the Regions Party and a group led by former Prime Minister Yulia Timoshenko.

"Expectations were very high, and I'm not just talking here about money," said Yuriy Ohulshanskyi, 73, a Kiev retiree who attended a Nov. 23 rally. "Our leaders made a mistake when they failed to sustain the revolutionary enthusiasm. They should have told us that even harder work was ahead of us. Instead, they told us to expect immediate paradise."

Since Yushchenko's victory in a re-run election in December, growth in Ukraine's $65 billion economy has faltered and citizens say corruption remains as rife as in the days of his predecessor Leonid Kuchma, who was criticized for stifling free speech and fixing asset sales. Millions poured onto the streets of Kiev last November after Kuchma's preferred successor was declared the winner of rigged presidential elections. Yushchenko promised more democracy, closer ties to the European Union, and rising living standards.

Campaigning for the March 26 parliamentary elections began on Nov. 26. The head of the winning party will become prime minister, whose powers will be expanded for the first time to include some responsibilities now held by the president, including the right to appoint the cabinet. Parties have until Dec. 25 to pick candidates.

Yushchenko Foe

The Regions Party, led by former Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych, Kuchma's candidate who ran against Yushchenko for the presidency last year, ranked first with 17.4 percent support, according to the Razumkov Center survey.

Timoshenko's alliance, which she has cobbled together since her dismissal on Sept. 8, placed second with 12.8 percent.

"Such diverse political groups were united under the Orange banner that they were bound to split after they won, simply because the political ambitions of each of the groups' leaders were too high," said Oleksandr Lytvynenko, a researcher at the Kiev-based Center for Political and Economic Studies. "On top of that, the president didn't have enough political will to push through economic and political changes.''

Yanukovych's victory sparked the revolution when U.S. and EU observers ruled the balloting was rife with fraud. The results were voided after millions of people, many wearing the orange color of Yushchenko's party, demonstrated on Independence Square and across the former Soviet republic.

Yushchenko won the re-run election Dec. 26 and was sworn into office Jan. 21.

Disappointment

"There is disappointment," said Olha Hnotovska, a 45-year-old university employee who took part in the street protests last year that brought Yushchenko, 51, to power. She spoke after the Nov. 23 rally on Kiev's Independence Square. "The revolution wasn't about personalities. We were defending the freedom to choose."

Yushchenko dismissed his cabinet on Sept. 8 amid accusations of graft and accepted the resignation of his head of national security, Petro Poroshenko.

Timoshenko, who stood at Yushchenko's side during the revolution, was fired after Yushchenko said he lost confidence in her ability to improve the economy and fight corruption.

Slowing Economy

The economy may expand 4 percent this year, one-third the pace of 2004, after companies deferred investments following government seizures of properties that were sold by Kuchma at discount prices.

The annual inflation rate will probably top 10 percent this year, Yushchenko said Nov. 22, higher than the 8 percent he forecast on June 16. The trade deficit by September ballooned to $748 million from a surplus in July, as exports waned. The average monthly wage of $133 a month is still a fraction of Germany's $4,500 a month.

"The economy can't get much worse; it will improve, because there is a new, competent, government in place now," said Marianna Kozintseva, New-York based emerging market strategist at Bear Stearns Cos. "Growth slowed because of major mistakes by Timoshenko's government."

Lawmakers have yet to approve changes that would harmonize Ukrainian laws with those of the World Trade Organization's members. Ukraine, which has been trying to join the WTO since 1997, may enter the organization next year, after missing a 2005 deadline, Yushchenko said on Nov. 22.

Timoshenko Comeback?

Since her dismissal, Timoshenko has criticized Yushchenko, saying the administration of her successor, Prime Minister Yuriy Yekhanurov, is too closely allied with the nation's richest businessmen.

She said on Nov. 22 that the two political leaders should patch up their differences and work together during the campaign to ensure Yanukovych doesn't take power.

"If we don't stick together, Yanukovych will have his revenge," Timoshenko said in a Nov. 22 speech. "This isn't just a possibility. There is a 100 percent chance of this happening."

Lytvynenko at the Center for Political and Economic Studies, didn't rule out a coalition of Yushchenko, Timoshenko and Yanukovych.

"The majority will be formed by this troika, as none of them will be able to form a majority all by themselves," he said.

Source: Bloomberg

Bookmark and Share

Monday, November 28, 2005

Bloom is Off the Orange Revolution

KIEV, Ukraine -- Crowds descended on Kiev's main square Tuesday to celebrate the first anniversary of the start of Ukraine's Orange Revolution, the weeks of mass protests of election fraud that ushered the opposition into power.

Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko (R) speaks as sacked Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko (L) applauds during a huge rally at the Indepedence Square in Kiev November 22, 2005

As a light snow fell, many supporters bundled up in orange scarves for the celebrations, featuring an address by President Viktor Yushchenko in Kiev's Independence Square, the site of the rallies last year.

The festivities were muted by Ukrainians' disappointment with the failure since the upheaval last year to achieve rapid progress in eliminating the poverty and widespread corruption in this former Soviet republic. However, Mr. Yushchenko, who defeated his Russian-backed rival on a platform promising to bring Ukraine closer to the West, told AP in an interview hours before the event that there was much of which Ukraine could be proud.

He wore a tie in the shade of bright orange that was his campaign's color.

Also addressing the crowd was Yulia Tymoshenko, a one-time Orange Revolution ally and now a chief political competitor after bitter rivalry drove them apart.

Nostalgia, a year later

As evening fell, the square filled with people, although in numbers far short of the massive crowds a year earlier.

Then, millions jammed the streets to protest fraud in the bitter election. They chanted "Yu-shchen-ko!" and set up a sprawling tent camp, bringing life in this city of more than 2 million to a halt.

A repeat runoff ordered by the Supreme Court led to Mr. Yushchenko's election.

"It was a turning point in the life of the nation," said Dasha Lysenko, 17, a student who spent two months in the opposition tent camps last year. "We stood on the square, not for politicians but for the ideals, for freedom."

With opinion polls showing a majority thinks the country is headed in the wrong direction, there's a natural inclination to fall back on the heady days of November 2004.

"For maybe the first time, the whole world learned where Ukraine was -- and not because of Chernobyl or some other catastrophe but because of the revolution ... it defined us," said Petro Poroshenko, a tycoon whose TV station broke through the government's press blackout to show the nation of 47 million what was unfolding in Kiev.

The Orange Revolution began hours after the polls for the presidential election closed on Nov. 21 last year. As the Central Election Commission began churning out fraudulent vote counts in favor of Russia's man, Viktor Yanukovych, reformist candidate Mr. Yushchenko summoned his partisans to Independence Square.

Court ordered second vote

They poured in, pitching hundreds of tents, setting up outdoor kitchens and vowing to stay until justice prevailed. Disciplined, cheerful, even picking up their cigarette butts, they demanded freedom and democracy. After 70 years as a Soviet republic, and another 15 feeling the rigors of the free market, many simply wanted Ukraine to be a normal European country.

"Yu-shchen-ko!" they chanted through the night. Sometimes, it was more rock concert than revolution.

Riot police stood ready. Departing President Leonid Kuchma went on television and called for an end to "this so-called revolution." European envoys scrambled to mediate. Politicians in the Russian-speaking provinces talked secession.

Twelve days later, the Supreme Court declared the vote count fraudulent and ordered the election rerun. Kiev erupted in fireworks and spelled Mr. Yushchenko's name in lights on the buildings around the square.

"The revolution became a symbol of the spirit and patriotism of Ukraine," said Mr. Yushchenko's former chief of staff, Oleksandr Zinchenko. "It wasn't just about one person ... it was about our freedom."

Last Dec. 26, Mr. Yushchenko won the rerun. Mr. Yanukovych fought on in the courts but to no avail, and Mr. Yushchenko was sworn in as president.

But the good will didn't last

The revolutionaries were a mismatched group of reformers, socialists, and populists united only by their hatred of Mr. Kuchma's corrupt regime. They had scores to settle, and some had political skeletons to hide. They inherited a nation divided between the pro-Russia east and the nationalist west. With just 52 percent of the votes, Mr. Yushchenko's victory was less than a landslide.

Initially, the new government plunged into action with pension and salary increases, sacked 18,000 bureaucrats and summoned former officials for questioning. Mr. Yushchenko traveled to the hostile east to publicly berate officials and remind them that he was "the president of the whole country." Demonstrators pelted him with snowballs.

One of the most contentious issues was the murky privatization deals during the Kuchma era, when much of the state's prime industry was sold cheap to insiders. Here the cracks in the government became obvious.

Inside deals challenged

New Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, the president's glamorous, energetic ally, wanted hundreds of these deals revoked and the properties resold. Mr. Yushchenko resisted such a radical strategy.

The Tymoshenko government's heavy hand spooked investors. It also was blamed for triggering a jump in meat, sugar and gas prices by trying to impose price controls. Ukraine's economic growth slid below 4 percent, a shock after the soaring 12 percent of 2004, partly in response to lower world prices for its main metals exports.

In September, Mr. Yushchenko fired Mrs. Tymoshenko.

Meanwhile, Ukrainians complain that the revolution has failed to deliver on promises to improve living standards and restore trust in government, that it has been tarnished by claims of corruption and backroom political deals, and that Mr. Yushchenko is cozying up to the revolution's enemies.

Mr. Zinchenko has quit as Mr. Yushchenko's chief of staff and has accused former colleagues of corruption. One of those he accused is Mr. Poroshenko, the TV tycoon, who then had led the government's powerful Security and Defense Council. He quit over the corruption accusations and was later cleared of wrongdoing, though the former top prosecutor claims it cost him his job.

In an attempt to mollify his opponents in eastern Ukraine, Mr. Yushchenko signed a truce with Mr. Yanukovych that promises immunity from prosecution to those involved in election fraud in exchange for the opposition's parliamentary support for Mr. Yushchenko's new prime minister. He also has sent conciliatory messages to the Kremlin.

Mr. Yushchenko insists that Ukraine is still eagerly knocking on the doors of NATO and the European Union, though neither appears to be in any rush to respond. And not only is Russia a key economic partner, but the two countries' ties of history, culture, religion and language make a rupture impossible.

"The revolution couldn't carry on indefinitely," said analyst Mykhailo Pohrebinsky. "At some point, the government had to settle down."

President gets credit

Opinion polls show that Ukrainians credit Mr. Yushchenko with advancing democracy and freedom and improving Ukraine's international image. An example of the new openness: Just this month, Mr. Yushchenko took both friendly and hostile questions on live television from students on the hot-button issues of the day.

Andriy Yusov, a leading member of Pora, a youth group that was one of the driving forces of the Orange Revolution protests, concedes, despite his pessimism, that at least the controversy over Mrs. Tymoshenko, Mr. Yushchenko's first prime minister, played out on the nation's nightly news and not behind closed doors, as in the past.

"The people and the government have become closer," he said, "but it is not because the government moved closer to the people. It's the people who stepped right up into the face of the government."

At the televised session with students, Mr. Yushchenko, 51, reminded the youngsters of how much he had paid, personally and physically, for his country's sake.

"I sit in front of you without my own face," he said, referring to the pockmarks and swelling that still show from his dioxin poisoning last year -- a mystery still unsolved but widely viewed as an attempt to derail his presidential bid.

"I think that I drank not only my dose but also a dose for all of you, as we lived in a regime that didn't allow us to live," he said.

Source: AP

Bookmark and Share

Bill Clinton Praises Ukraine's Reforms

KIEV, Ukraine -- Former President Clinton on Sunday praised Ukraine's reforms since last year's Orange Revolution but counseled Ukrainians to have patience.

Former U.S. President Bill Clinton smiles at journalists after a joint news conference with Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko Sunday, Nov. 27, 2005, in the Ukrainian capital Kiev

"It takes time to build the kind of vibrant, progressive, forward-moving nation that you are all working to build," Clinton said at a news conference with Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko.

Many Ukrainians have expressed disappointment at their nation's failure to improve living standards and battle corruption since last year's mass protests against election fraud. There have been no demonstrable improvements in poverty rates, and Yushchenko's approval ratings have plunged after a split with his Orange Revolution partners and allegations of corruption against some of his closest aides.

Clinton came to Ukraine to offer his foundation's help to this ex-Soviet republic in its struggle against HIV and AIDS and to hold brief talks with Yushchenko.

The United States played an important role in condemning the fraud-marred vote and calling for a revote, which Ukraine's Supreme Court ordered and Yushchenko won.

"I see a more vibrant democracy, freedom of speech, a more aggressive, free press and freedom of political assembly and the kind of disagreements that characterize any modern democracy," Clinton said.

Yushchenko's party faces a tough challenge in March as Ukrainians elect a new parliament.

Yushchenko repeated a call for the country's democratic forces to unite.

"Solidarity and unity is the most original concept for bringing victory in the 2006 parliamentary elections," he said.

Under a deal signed Sunday, the Clinton Foundation will provide training for medical professionals who deal with HIV patients and will help Ukrainians get access to HIV medications at discounted prices.

Ukraine has one of the fastest-growing HIV rates in the world, with some experts suggesting that as many as 500,000 people - 1 percent of the population - are infected.

Source: AP

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, November 27, 2005

Ukrainian McDonalds Denies Visitors Free Burgers for Tymoshenko’s Birthday

KIEV, Ukraine -- Dozens of Ukrainian students rushed to the Kiev McDonalds restaurant, demanding a free lunch promised in a propaganda leaflet as a present from former PM Yulia Tymoshenko for her a birthday, news agencies reported Sunday.


Tymoshenko turned 45 on Friday, and spent the day quietly with her family.

However in Kiev the ousted PM’s birthday was celebrated without her participation, when students crowded in the city’s McDonalds restaurants, demanding free lunches, Itar Tass reported.

It appeared that somebody had distributed a leaflet around the city, promising everyone free McDonalds lunches to honor Tymoshenko’s birthday.

McDonalds management denied its participation in the action, and the young people had to leave.

Some observers call the incident a provocation, Itar Tass added. Campaign ahead of elections to Ukrainian Rada started this week, and Tymoshenko’s faction Batkivshina is an active participant.

Source: MosNews

Bookmark and Share

Pirates Free Ukrainian Ship Off Somali Coast

KIEV, Ukraine — Pirates freed a Ukrainian cargo ship seized nearly 40 days ago off the coast of Somalia, Ukraine's Foreign Ministry said Sunday.


The Panahia's 22 crew members were safe after being freed late Saturday, and by noon Sunday the ship was 90 miles (144 kilometers) away from Somalia's east coast, the Foreign Ministry said in a statement.

It was not immediately clear if the US$700,000 (euro585,000) ransom demanded by the pirates had been paid, although earlier officials in Kiev had said the Ukrainian company was ready to pay. No one at the Foreign Ministry could be reached to comment Sunday afternoon.

The ship, owned by an unidentified company from Ukraine's southern city of Odessa, was sailing under a Liberian flag and was carrying iron ore from South Africa to Turkey when it was seized on Oct. 18.

The Foreign Ministry said the ship was escorted away from the Somali coast overnight by a French vessel, and the Defense Ministry expressed thanks to French officials for their assistance.

President Viktor Yushchenko also spoke by telephone with the ship's captain and wished them a safe journey back home, the Foreign Ministry said.

Piracy is rampant off the coast of Somalia, which is torn by renewed clashes between militias fighting over control of the troubled African country of 7 million. Many companies resort to paying ransoms, saying they have few alternatives.

Source: AP

Bookmark and Share

Campaign Kicks Off for Key Election in Ukraine

KIEV, Ukraine -- Ukraine has kicked off a campaign for a key parliamentary election next March, which forces supporting President Viktor Yushchenko will need to win in order for the president to continue with the pro-Western course he has avowed for the ex-Soviet nation.

Ukraine President Viktor Yushchenko (L)

Ukraine's central election commission had decreed Saturday the official start of campaigning for the March 26 election, during which voters will choose a new parliament, regional councils and city chiefs.

Because of constitutional changes that enter into force on January 1, 2006, the party that wins a majority of seats or is able to form a viable coalition in the 450-seat Upper Rada legislature will name the prime minister and form the government, powers currently held by the president.

Unlike previous years, all of the parliamentary seats will be elected by proportional representation, meaning voters will be casting ballots for parties which will need to get at least three percent of the national vote in order to enter the legislature.

Source: AFP

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, November 26, 2005

Ukraine Commemorates Victims Of Stalin-Era Famine

KIEV, Ukraine -- Ukraine's President Viktor Yushchenko planted trees in a city park in Kyiv today to commemorate victims of the forced Soviet-era famine that killed up to 10 million Ukrainians.

On 25 November, Yushchenko called on the international community to recognize as genocide the famine that Soviet dictator Josef Stalin provoked in the winter of 1932-33 when he imposed grain requisitioning as part of his campaign to force Ukrainian peasants to join collective farms.

Much of the Ukrainian grain was sold to make money for the Soviet industrialization campaign as Ukrainians starved.

Later in the day, Yushchenko participated in a commemorative rally where relatives and survivors lit 33,000 candles - representing the number of people who were dying daily at the famine's height.

Ukrainians lit candles at the monument to the victims of the Soviet-era forced famine that killed up to 10 million Ukrainians, in Ukraine's capital Kiev, Saturday, Nov. 26, 2005.

Source: Radio Free Europe

Bookmark and Share

Ukraine Demands 'Genocide' Marked

KIEV, Ukraine -- Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko has called on the international community to recognise the 1930s Great Famine as Soviet-enforced genocide.

One third of the Ukrainians who starved to death, were children

"The world must know about this tragedy," he said, at the opening of an exhibition dedicated to famine victims.

Millions of Ukrainians starved to death in 1932-33 as USSR leader Joseph Stalin stripped them of their produce in a forced farm collectivisation campaign.

A small number of nations have already recognised the famine as genocide.

Ukraine has designated 26 November as an official day of remembrance for victims of "Holodomor" - meaning murder by hunger - and other political crackdowns.

There are plans to mark the anniversary this Saturday by lighting 33,000 candles - representing the number of people thought to have been dying every day at the height of the famine.

The true scale of the disaster was concealed by the Soviet Union, and only came to light after Ukrainian independence in 1991.

Cannibalism is reported to have become rife as a whole nation starved.

The tragedy should "become a lesson for our nation as well as for the whole world", Mr Yushchenko said on Friday.

In 2003, marking the 70th anniversary of the famine, the UN said the famine "ranks with the worst atrocities of our time" and a national tragedy - but left out any reference to genocide.

Russia opposed

Roman Serbyn, professor of history and a Ukrainian expert at the University of Quebec in Montreal, says: "Ukraine did not make a technically clear case."

Farmers' produce was forcefully collected by the state

He believes the "genocide" designation has proved elusive because the famine is often considered to have been aimed at a social group (peasants) rather than a national or ethnic group.

However, a strong case can be put showing that by closing the borders so Ukrainians could not escape to Russia, Stalin was targeting Ukrainian nationals, he says.

Russia opposes designation as genocide, he says, and "the biggest reason is national pride. But also the political and economic consequences... if you recognise a crime you might have to pay compensation".

In 2003 Russia's ambassador to Ukraine, Viktor Chernomyrdin, was quoted by Interfax news agency dismissing talk of an apology or compensation, saying: "We're not going to apologise... there is nobody to apologise to."

Source: BBC

Bookmark and Share

Friday, November 25, 2005

Former Boxing Champion Vitali Klitschko to Enter Politics

KIEV, Ukraine -- Newly retired WBC heavyweight boxing champion Vitali Klitschko said Nov. 25 that he plans to enter politics but kept Ukrainians guessing about where he sees himself - in the Kyiv mayor's office or in parliament.

Vitali Klitschko

Klitschko, who unexpectedly left international boxing last month, told reporters in the Ukrainian capital that he "didn't exclude" a possible electoral run, saying he wanted first to gauge public support.

"My sporting career is over, but I believe that I have a rather good opportunity so that my contacts, energy and knowledge can be put to a new task," the 34-year-old boxer said.

"If Kyiv residents support my initiative, I don't exclude the possibility of putting forward my candidacy for the seat of the city's head," he said.

After the packed news conference, Ukrainian journalists mobbed the popular boxer for autographs, which he smilingly gave them.

Klitschko retired after a knee injury forced him to pull out of a long-delayed title defense against Hasim Rahman in Las Vegas. At the time he hinted that he might be considering a career in politics.

During last year's tumultuous Orange Revolution protests, the boxer, who has a doctorate in sports from a Kyiv university, threw his support behind then-opposition leader Viktor Yushchenko.

He returned to Kyiv to mark the first anniversary on Nov. 22, pleading with now feuding, leaders of the Orange Revolution - Yushchenko and former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko - to reunite.

"I still can't understand this artificial split between the democratic forces," Klitschko said.

He refused to answer questions asking if he had a preference for one side or another.

Opinion polls show that Klitschko's name recognition and popularity would make him a serious contender for the mayor's office, but running for the office might force him to take on his longtime patron, Kyiv Mayor Oleksandr Omelchenko.

Omelchenko also has kept silent about whether he plans to seek a third term, and many speculated he was waiting to see what Klitschko would do.

Source: AP

Bookmark and Share

Ukrainian President Calls on World to Recognize Soviet-Era Famine as Genocide

KIEV, Ukraine -- President Viktor Yushchenko called on the international community Friday to recognize as genocide the forced Soviet-era famine that killed up to 10 million Ukrainians.

Ukraine's President Viktor Yushchenko (L), is seen after he opened an exhibition to mark the anniversary of the 1932-33 forced famine, in Ukraine's capital Kiev Friday, Nov.25, 2005. Yushchenko called on the international community to recognize as genocide the Soviet era Great Famine that killed up to 10 million Ukrainians

Soviet dictator Josef Stalin provoked the 1932-1933 famine as part of his campaign to force Ukrainian peasants to give up their land and join collective farms. During the height of the famine, cases of cannibalism were widespread as people grew desperate to survive.

"The world must know about this tragedy," said Yushchenko at the opening of an exhibition dedicated to the famine victims on the eve of its anniversary.

He said the millions of victims should "become a lesson for our nation as well as for the whole world."

Yushchenko demanded that Ukrainian diplomats strengthen their efforts to receive recognition from all countries. Already, some countries such as Canada, the United States, Austria, Hungary and Lithuania have recognized the famine as genocide.

Ukraine plans to mark the anniversary Saturday by lighting 33,000 candles - representing the number of people who died every day at the famine's height.

The former Soviet republic also plans to plant an alley of trees and hold a downtown march in the capital, Kyiv. The National Broadcasting Council asked television and radio stations to not air any entertainment programs on Saturday.

Source: AP

Bookmark and Share

Ukraine Struggles to Make Orange Revolution Work

KIEV, Ukraine -- One year after our Orange Revolution, many Ukrainians see its ideals as betrayed. Belief in a government answerable to the people and in a transparent market purged of insider dealing no longer guides government policy. Instead, the ideals for which we struggled appear as slogans invoked by those who want to protect their vested interests.

Yulia Tymoshenko (R) speaking at the first anniversary of the 'Orange Revolution'

Cynics explain this by saying that our "Orange" ideals were never anything but the rationalizations of one set of oligarchs struggling to overthrow another. Once masters of the situation, it is said, the zeal of those who promised reform mutated into a zeal to preserve their private wealth and that of their friends.

How did Ukraine reach this state of cynicism? A year ago, everyone gathered in the streets of Kiev knew what we were standing up against: a corrupt government that sought to command life and labor, and to dispose of state property, at its will. In so far as formal legal rights existed, no court could be relied upon to enforce those rights when our rulers saw their interests as challenged.

In evicting that regime, we believed that this form of absolutism was ended. Instead, those who benefited from the regime's corruptions insisted that their rights to the property they had stolen were inviolate. These crony capitalists argue that, if they were left alone to develop their assets, they would make the country prosperous. Tamper with property, no matter how ill-gotten, and no investor will have confidence, they claim.

That is the oldest excuse to justify wrongdoing: The end justifies the means. But power -- be it political or economic -- without legitimate origins is arbitrary. An economy that appears arbitrary and illegitimate in the eyes of the majority of people may, for a time, run on the false confidence of easy profits. Corruption, however, is inevitable because the rule of law, which is the market's ultimate guarantor, depends on the consent of all its participants and their belief in its core fairness.

A radical lawlessness was at the heart of Ukraine's privatization process. So we must not be tricked by the fact that those who gained economic power by looting state assets now employ lawyers, invoke free market nostrums, and claim to follow the letter of the law. For there is such a thing as a lawless legality. It is found when governments deny that in making or interpreting laws, they are bound by the spirit of the law.

In this respect, the oligarchs and their political placemen who insist that their right to stolen property is sacred make the same crude claim as the regime that we overthrew: that they have an indefeasible right to the exercise of power. They reject the principle that there is a law which is superior to presidents, magnates, majorities, or mobs. If their claim is upheld, then the cynics are right: Our revolution was merely about whether one class or another, one person or another, would obtain the power to work his or her will.

Endorsing the claim to arbitrary power is the cardinal heresy of those who say we should certify property stolen from the state as rightfully owned. I call this a heresy because it rejects the supremacy of equality under law and proclaims the supremacy of particular men. This is alien to any and all concepts of liberty. It is the legalism of the barbarian, and the nihilist philosophy that everyone has in reaction against the coming of political and economic liberty to Ukraine.

Legal primitives are not alone in embracing this stance. Many economists also believe that ownership of stolen goods must be recognized. They liken the transition from communism to the state of nature described by John Locke. So they imagine the property rights acquired through cronyism, nepotism and backroom dealing as somehow emerging from a Lockean realm of freedom. When my government questioned this assumption, they cried out that this was interference by the state with legitimate property rights.

Another group also succumbed to this delusion. Some who a year ago displayed great public spirit came to feel, when in government, that they could not vindicate the supremacy of law without curtailing economic growth. Because the grind of government can obscure enduring principle, people inspired by the best motives now find themselves on the same side as their criminal adversaries. They have, I believe, lost their way and taken a path that can only lead back to the supremacy of arbitrary power.

Indeed, the denial that men may be arbitrary is the higher law by which we must govern. Without this conviction the letter of the law is nothing but a mask for bureaucratic caprice and authoritarian will. For when people do not believe that their government adheres to this higher spirit of law, no Constitution is worth the paper it is written on; no business transaction is safe.

For maintaining a constitutional order and viable free market requires an intuitive dislike of arbitrariness, a sensitivity to its manifestations, and spontaneous resistance.

This was why my government sought to recover stolen state property. By doing so, and then auctioning that property in a transparent manner, Ukrainians saw that arbitrary action could be redressed, that the rule of law applied to the powerful as well as the weak.

The lesson is clear: If a president may not act willfully, arbitrarily, by personal prerogative, then no one may. Ministers may not. Parliament may not. Majorities may not. Individuals may not. Crowds may not. Only by adhering to this higher law will Ukraine develop the consciousness of law that true liberty demands.

By identifying the law with their vested rights, the oligarchs who have [for now] derailed the ideals of the Orange Revolution sought to shield their own interests from challenge. But because men pervert a truth, there is no reason to abandon it.

If, as we were taught by Marx, belief in a higher law is a mixture of sentimentality, superstition and unconscious rationalizations, then the predations that incited the Orange Revolution are in reality the only possible conditions in which we can live. We must give up the hope of liberty within an ordered society and market and resign ourselves to that interminable war of all against all of which Hobbes spoke.

Indeed, the policies now being offered seem hostile to the ideals of our Orange Revolution. We are asked to choose between social solidarity and economic growth. To escape from want we are told, we must embrace illegality. To promote truth, we are told that old crimes must not be examined.

These choices are as false as they are intolerable. Yet these are the choices offered by our influential doctrinaires. But to see these as Ukraine's only options is to mistake weariness for wisdom, and to be discouraged rather than to understand. For the search for law has an irresistible energy. No human obstruction can long withstand it. Though we may take a step back now and then, only by adhering to this higher law can Ukraine achieve freedom and prosperity for all. Achieve it we will.

Source: Yulia Tymoshenko

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, November 24, 2005

Lose the Fence

KIEV, Ukraine -- Bankova, the street that’s home to the State Secretariat as well as to other important Ukrainian government buildings, has for a while been closed off to the public. As Ukraine this week marks the anniversary of the start of the Orange Revolution, it’s an excellent time to point out that that’s a disgrace.

Bankova Street at start of "Orange Revolution" in November 2004

Actually, closing off Bankova represents a step backward even from the miserable standards of former President Leonid Kuchma’s government. During the Kuchma years, Bankova was – sensibly – closed to motor traffic. But any pedestrian was free to walk past the sentry posts and the vehicle barrier and access the street. The Kuchma administration was famous for treating Ukrainian citizens with the utmost contempt, but that the street was open, at least, was how it should have been.

Bankova, of course, played a central role in the Orange Revolution. Protestors clogged both its Instytutska and Lyuteranska intersections, facing down riot police in tense and by now famous stand-offs. The riot barricades that the government threw up to protect the strategically important street from the orange hordes were symbols of what the revolution was fighting. When Yulia Tymoshenko breached them and was handed into the inner sanctum, she provided one of the uprising’s iconic moments.

Soon after President Viktor Yushchenko finally took office, he ripped down not only the ad hoc riot barriers, but also the permanent Bankova fences, in a recognition of their symbolic importance. His stirring statement at the time was to the effect that his government didn’t need any fences there at all – his crew, unlike Kuchma’s, did not fear the Ukrainian people.

What a difference the better part of a year makes. Now Bankova is closed off completely. You can’t walk down it at all anymore.

As the Orange Revolution’s anniversary comes, the new fence is obviously a symbol to be used by anyone who would like to make a point about the insufficiencies of the Orange Revolution, and about how, supposedly, not enough has changed since the Kuchma days. The new fence is therefore a terrible idea for symbolic reasons, and an index of the president’s strangely wishy-washy political personality.

Yushchenko often seems politically tone deaf, but this represents a new frontier in strategic fecklessness. On the other hand, maybe Yushchenko hasn’t been tone deaf and feckless – maybe he really does fear the Ukrainian citizenry, and want to keep it as far away from himself as possible. It’s increasingly the tragedy of Yushchenko’s career that one never really knows exactly what motivates him, or where he stands.

Besides, it’s not as if blocking off Bankova, which we understand was an initiative of Internal Affairs department chief Ihor Tarasyuk, is all that necessary for security. Back in the Kuchma days, Bankova was a very tightly controlled street. Given all the machinegun-toting guards around, the pedestrian felt a bit uncomfortable and stared-at there, which was not inappropriate.

It seems to us that anyone causing trouble on Bankova back then would have lasted mere seconds before he was dropped. It also seems to us that the government need not fear the excessively disruptive potential of citizen protests. Let the guards simply put waist-high barriers up to keep people away from the doorways, as is already done in front of parliament.

There’s nothing except a superfluous bit of false security to be gained by erecting a fence between the citizenry and the government. It’s impractical, too. The House of Chimeras, arguably Kyiv’s most famous building, is now off-limits, which is ridiculous.

President Yushchenko, in the spirit of the Orange Revolution that we’re all celebrating this week, tear down that fence.

Source: Kyiv Post Editorial

Bookmark and Share

Revisiting the Orange Revolution, Part One

WASHINGTON, DC --Ukraine held the second round of its contentious presidential election on November 21, 2004. When the incumbent regime of President Leonid Kuchma tried to steal the election from popular favorite Viktor Yushchenko, thousands of Ukrainians took the streets in what came to be known as the "Orange Revolution," in honor of the Yushchenko campaign color.

Yulia Tymoshenko on the First Anniversary of the Orange Revolution


One year later, the new administration has not fulfilled many of the expectations that arose from the Orange Revolution. Nevertheless, it would be wrong to paint the first year of Yushchenko's administration as either all positive or all negative, although the latter is currently more often heard.

In its first year, the Orange team has registered 10 achievements, but has come up short in seven other areas. The first part of this two-part article looks at the areas of progress.

Human Rights and Democratization. As the EU has noted, Ukraine's Orange Revolution and Yushchenko's election put the country back on the democratic track that had stalled in Kuchma's second term. Since the late 1990s most members of the Commonwealth of Independent States have evolved towards authoritarian regimes and "managed democracies." But a recent EU report noted that there are no systematic human rights violations in Ukraine.

Civic Empowerment. The number of Ukrainians who took part in Orange protests is huge. Throughout the country, one in five Ukrainians took part in protests locally or in Kyiv. In Kyiv itself, 48% of its 2.5 million population took part in the Orange Revolution.

Participation in the Orange Revolution changed Ukrainians from subjects into citizens. Ukrainians, who were traditionally viewed as passive by Soviet and post-Soviet rulers, are unlikely to continue to be submissive. A September 2005 poll by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology asked Ukrainians if they were ready to defend their civil rights; 51% said "Yes." In western and central Ukraine this answer was as high as 65%.

Democratic Political System. In early 2006, Ukraine will change to a parliamentary-presidential system resembling those commonly found in central Europe and the Baltic states. These parliamentary systems have helped these countries to register democratic progress and move toward Euro-Atlantic integration.

Media Freedom. Ukraine's media environment has been transformed. The Social Democratic Party-United (SDPUo) has lost influence at the three television channels it once controlled (State Channel 1, 1+1, and Inter). Other channels controlled by Viktor Pinchuk (ICTV, STB, Novyi Kanal) have become more balanced in their coverage.

The Internet received a major boost from the 2004 elections. The Orange Revolution has been described as the world's first "Internet Revolution." Today, nearly 20% of Ukrainians use the Internet regularly.

International media watchdogs, such as Reporters Without Frontiers, have also noted the considerable improvement in Ukraine's press freedom. Ukraine's ranking (112) in the 2005 Annual Worldwide Press Freedom Index is far higher than that of Russia (138) or Belarus (152).

Ukrainian journalists now work in a freer environment, no longer fearing arrest or violence. Gone are the censorship instructions (temnyky) issued by Kuchma's administration to television stations.

Political Parties. The Socialists, allied to President Yushchenko since the Orange Revolution, are now the leading left-wing party, rather than the Communists whose allegiance to the Ukrainian state was always suspect. The Communist Party will likely win only about 30 seats in the 2006 parliament, down from 120 in the 1998.

Formerly pro-Kuchma centrists are in disarray. Only one of the three large centrist parties from the Kuchma era (Regions of Ukraine) is poised to enter the 2006 parliament. The SDPUo and Labor Ukraine parties each have ratings of 1%.

Corruption. The first year of the Yushchenko administration has seen Ukraine moving from a pretend struggle against corruption under Kuchma to a modest attempt at battling this problem. Some 4,500 of the myriad regulations to register businesses have been annulled, eliminating a major source of corruption. There is now a single channel to register businesses and a single channel to clear customs. Previously a new business venture had to seek permits from 34 separate groups, giving many opportunities for bribes.

Some 52% of Ukrainians believe some progress has taken place, but more needs to be done. Transparency International, a think tank researching corruption around the world, has recorded gains in Ukraine this year. Its 2005 Corruption Perceptions Index provides evidence that policies introduced this year to battle corruption are producing results. Ukraine's improved ranking has "resulted in an increased sense of optimism regarding governance and corruption in Ukraine."

Oligarchs. The era when oligarchs could earn high rents from a close relationship with a corrupt executive is over. The Yushchenko administration has outlined a "deal" whereby in exchange for no further re-privatizations, oligarchs now have to evolve into law-abiding businessmen.

This means an end to corrupt business practices; businessmen must move their activities out of the shadow economy and increase their tax payments. Revenues to Ukraine's annual $20 billion budget soared by 30% this year, despite an economic slowdown. VAT payments have grown from 16 billion hryvni ($3.2 billion) last year to 28 billion ($5.6 billion) this year. Taxes on profits have also grown by nearly 50%.

The Kyiv Post concluded that these healthier figures exist because "More Ukrainian companies are willing to come out of the shadows in order to boost their appeal to investors and drum up foreign money."

Social Welfare. The minimum pension was increased to the same level as the minimum wage. Wages for those employed by the state increased 57%. Social welfare spending, including child support to encourage Ukraine to move out of its demographic crisis, has grown by 73%.

Religious Freedom. The Ukrainian (Uniate) Catholic Church has moved its headquarters to Kyiv, a move that would have been hampered under Kuchma. Prospects for the unification of the pro-Russian and pro-Ukrainian Orthodox Churches in Ukraine are now far greater.

Divergence from Russia. While Ukraine experienced a democratic breakthrough in Ukraine, Russia simultaneously fell further into an autocratic abyss. In the aftermath of Russia's fraudulent parliamentary and presidential elections, the New York-based human rights think tank Freedom House downgraded Russia from "partly free" to "unfree," the first time Russia has been given this rank since the collapse of the USSR.

The 2004 breakthrough "reinvigorated and jumpstarted the democratic political development" of Ukraine, Freedom House concluded. Ukraine recorded significant progress in four areas: electoral process, civil society, independent media, and judicial framework. Russia registered the greatest decline of any country in the in the same four areas in 2004.

Ukraine's "Democracy Score" (4.5) is better than Russia's at 5.61, out of a range of 1-7 with 7 being the worst score. But Ukraine's 4.5 score is also moving closer to Croatia's at 3.75, and Croatia is a possible candidate for EU membership in 2007 alongside Romania (3.39) and Bulgaria (3.18). Of the four "color revolutions," Ukraine's Democracy Score is the same as Serbia's (3.75) and improved on Georgia's (4.96) and Kyrgyzstan's (5.64).

Despite noticeable progress in these 10 areas, problems remain for the Orange team. These will be discussed in Part Two of this series.

Source: Eurasia Daily Monitor

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, November 23, 2005

Is Ukraine's Future Still Orange?

BRATISLAVA, Slovakia -- When President Viktor Yushchenko strode out before the crowds in Kiev Tuesday night, one did not need powers of clairvoyance to see what was on his mind. How different it is to start a revolution, he must have thought, than to bring its ideals to fruition.

Ukrainian demonstrators hold Orange flags, symbols of last year's Orange Revolution, during a rally at the Independence Square in Kiev, November 22, 2005. About 100,000 Ukrainians braved freezing temperatures and snow to mark the first anniversary of Ukraine's Orange Revolution

As Ukraine celebrates the first anniversary of the Orange Revolution, that, in a nutshell, is the nature of the problem Yushchenko has faced in the last 12 months and with key parliamentary elections looming in March it is a problem that is not about to disappear.

The critics have plenty to go on. Sky-high expectations have inevitably not been met. Economic growth has collapsed. The united front which led the revolution has buckled under the pressure: In

September, the president was forced to fire the entire government turning erstwhile allies such as former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko into bitter rivals.

Yushchenko has paid a heavy price in the popularity stakes for all this. Polls by the respected Razumkov agency showed confidence in the president dropping from 48 percent in February, just after he had taken office, to just 20 percent in the last such poll taken in September.

There have indeed been setbacks and the president and his team do not have long to put things right. But there is also much to celebrate on this anniversary and if Yushchenko can use it to turn his people's mind to what they have gained from the Orange Revolution there is still hope that he can turn things around.

Yushchenko might begin by issuing a series of reminders over the next few weeks of how barbaric the previous regime led by Leonid Kuchma really was. In those days, Mafia gangs associated with the government ran huge swathes of the economy.

Journalists who criticized the government risked beatings and even death. In one such case in 2000, the headless corpse of investigative journalist Grigoriy Gongadze was found dumped in a forest outside Kiev. Civil society under the old regime ran risks that few of us in the West can comprehend.

As for the revolution itself, everyone knows about the assassination attempt in which Yushchenko was poisoned with dioxin. But it has only recently emerged just how close the previous administration came to ordering a bloodbath.

Igor Smeshko, the former head of Ukraine's secret police, the SBU, told the BBC in remarks published on its website Tuesday that orders were, as some had suspected, initially given for fully armed troops to engage the demonstrators in Independence Square. They were sent back to barracks at the last moment.

But even then, according to Smeshko, there was a real danger of armed conflict breaking out inside the army and security services between supporters of Yushchenko and his opponent Viktor Yanukovych. Civil strife was a distinct possibility.

No one is saying that the political situation in Ukraine now corresponds to some sort of ideal, but the era of fear has at least passed. And that in itself marks a huge break from the past.

In other areas, the distinction between then and now is more blurred. Managing expectations about the economy, for example, was always going to be the toughest challenge for the reformists. Economic growth was heading into freefall even before Yushchenko took office. In the first nine months of this year it crept along at a modest 2.8 percent year-on-year compared with 12.7 percent in the same period in 2004.

No serious economist would argue that the downturn is due to the policies of the new administration. But try explaining the complexities of time-lag theory to a Ukrainian family living on $100 a month. Such people want immediate change. And when they don't see it they blame those who hold power now, and not the people whose previous policies condemned them to poverty in the first place.

Rooting out corruption was also going to be a major challenge and the new administration has suffered serious blows to its credibility amid charges that its senior officials have abused their positions to enrich themselves. Fortunately for the administration, the Prosecutor General's office cleared key Yushchenko ally Petro Poroshenko of wrong doing in late October. But it may take time to restore confidence.

More broadly, there have been some noteworthy successes on the corruption front. The $4.8 billion privatization of the Kryvorizshtal steel mill was conducted live on television, a move which has been widely praised by foreign investors used to major
state sell-offs being conducted in Ukraine behind closed doors among government cronies.

Transparency International's 2005 global corruption index also brought some modestly encouraging news, ranking Ukraine 113th out of 159 countries surveyed.

Usually, of course, a state of affairs which puts a European country on a par with Zimbabwe would be nothing to get excited about. But last year Ukraine was ranked in position number 128.

This is what progress in a country with the problems of Ukraine means in practice: small steps in the right direction, but the situation remains so dire that few among the public appear to notice that anything has changed.

On foreign policy, relations with Russia remain calm but cool -- about the best one could hope for with Vladimir Putin at the helm. The European Union has been predictably slow on the uptake with Ukraine, making positive noises about working more closely with the country but falling short of offering a clear path to accession.

Quick integration with NATO looks more promising. If reformists can work together to win the 2006 elections, the prospects for membership by the end of the decade are real.

But it is on those elections, of course, that everything in Ukraine now hinges. It is therefore vital that the estranged partners in the reformist camp can now effect some sort of reconciliation.

Because continued division could easily result in disaster. One can only hope that as Viktor Yushchenko and Yulia Tymoshenko left the celebrations to mark the first anniversary of the Orange Revolution on Tuesday, they did so in the knowledge that there are no guarantees that there will be a second in 12 months time.

Is the future still Orange? Only they can know the answer to that.

Source: UPI

Bookmark and Share

Dioxin Level in Yushchenko’s Blood Down 83% Over 12 Months, Data Show

KIEV, Ukraine -- The level of dioxin, a toxic chemical, in the blood of Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko fell by 83% over the past 12 months, according to latest test data revealed on Tuesday.

Viktor Yushchenko after dioxin poisoning in December, 2004

The level is still 1,000 times greater than normal, according to tests taken Nov. 9, Iryna Herashchenko, Yushchenko’s spokeswoman, said. A year ago, when Yushchenko was first diagnosed with dioxin poisoning, the level was reported at 6,000 times the norm.

“The Yushchenko family has just received this information,” Herashchenko said citing the latest test data.

The reduction of the dioxin levels shows the progress that Yushchenko makes while gradually recovering from the poisoning that had nearly cost his life during the last year’s presidential election campaign.

The normal level of dioxin is between 15 and 45 units per gram of blood fat, while Yushchenko has been diagnosed in December 2004 with about 100,000 units by the Free University in Amsterdam.

Almost everyone has some level of dioxins because the toxic chemical is widespread in the environment — mainly from its industrial usages — and accumulates in the food chain.

Most of what is known about the health effects of acute dioxin poisoning comes from experiments on animals. Most animals would die from the levels found in Yushchenko a year ago, scientists have said.

The latest tests were ordered by the Prosecutor General Office (PGO) in order to proceed with the investigation into the poisoning that some scientists and Yushchenko have described as the attempted murder.

Although the fact of the poisoning was confirmed by three independent western laboratories in December 2004, the PGO had only now requested official confirmation of the tests in order to proceed with the investigation.

The delays with ordering the tests shows either incompetence or neglect by Prosecutor General Sviatoslav Piskun, who has been fired by Yushchenko last month.

Yushchenko, then a presidential candidate, first fell ill after having dinner with Ukrainian Security Service chief Ihor Smeshko and his deputy, Volodymyr Satsyuk, on Sept. 5, 2004. He reported having a headache about three hours after the dinner, and by the next day had developed an acute stomach ache.

Yushchenko, who was rushed to a Vienna hospital on Sept. 10, later reported pancreatitis and gastrointestinal pain, as well as backache. He also suffered partial nerve paralysis in his face and an inflammation of one inner ear.

About three weeks after his first symptoms, he developed the rough, acne-like rash on his face which is the hallmark of dioxin poisoning.

Dioxin, which settles in the body fat, lasts a long time in the body. Some scientists mentioned liposuction, a procedure that sucks the fat out of the body, as one of the ways of reducing the contamination.

Source: Ukrainian Journal

Bookmark and Share

Sacked PM Upstages Yushchenko At Mass Ukraine Rally

KIEV, Ukraine -- Ukraine's dismissed prime minister seized the limelight from President Viktor Yushchenko a year after Orange Revolution protests with an electrifying appeal on Tuesday to join forces in next year's parliamentary election.

One of the leader of 'Orange Revolution' and former prime minister Yulia Tymoshenko applauds as President of Ukraine Viktor Yushchenko speaks during rally on Independence Square in Kiev. Ukraine marks Tuesday the first anniversary of its 'Orange Revolution'

Both Yushchenko and Yulia Tymoshenko, the premier he sacked in September, told supporters in Kiev's Independence Square that only a united team of reformers could win the March 2006 election to a parliament led by a prime minister with expanded powers.

But Tymoshenko's impassioned 20-minute address, delivered without notes, clearly won over a crowd of well more than 100,000 marking last year's mass protests which helped propel the president to victory in the re-run of a rigged poll.

"I am certain that just as we supported Viktor Yushchenko in the presidential election, we must now unite to elect a prime minister who will embody everything we fought for," Tymoshenko, tears welling in her eyes, told the crowd.

"I want to dismiss all the rumours that it is Tymoshenko versus Yushchenko. This cannot be so, because this is the president that you and I helped bring to power. We did it together."

Tymoshenko's speech on what the liberal administration has proclaimed "Freedom Day" was clearly aimed at the March election campaign.

It also sought to justify her eight months in charge of a government that blew apart after splitting into rival camps, each accusing the other of corruption.

As snow fell on the square, she told supporters: "My heart is with you. If it didn't work the first time, it will next time round. We cannot stop with things half finished."

PUBLIC CONFIDENCE SAPPED

Tymoshenko's dismissal dented the ratings of both leaders. It also sapped public confidence among Ukrainians who had backed the ideals of mass protests against election fraud and Yushchenko's calls to move Ukraine into the European mainstream.

The Regions Party of Viktor Yanukovich, the rival Yushchenko defeated in last year's lengthy election campaign, leads polls for the March contest with more than 20 percent support.

Tymoshenko's Fatherland Party lies second with 17 percent and the pro-presidential Our Ukraine commands about 12 percent.

Yushchenko looked distinctly uncomfortable, issuing a similar call for unity at the end of an hour-long speech interrupted periodically by hecklers shouting "Yulia, Yulia!"

"Do we want to win the 2006 parliamentary election? Yes, we do!" the president, accompanied on stage by his wife and children, said to modest applause from the crowd.

"This team standing behind me must be united, must work together and extend a hand to one another."

Tymoshenko, widely popular among rank-and-file voters for her rousing speeches during last year's protests, was appointed prime minister last February under an electoral pact.

During her tenure, Western investors took fright at calls for a sweeping review of privatisations conducted under the previous administration. She also clashed with Yushchenko over attempts to control fuel prices.

Her replacement, technocrat Yuri Yekhanurov, is seen as a transition figure before the March election brings in new arrangements handing many presidential powers to the prime minister and parliament.

Source: Reuters

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, November 22, 2005

US Presidential Message

First Anniversary of the Orange Revolution

I send greetings to those celebrating the first anniversary of the Orange Revolution.

One year ago today, hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian citizens stood up to defend democracy in their homeland. Through great courage and determination, they showed the world that the love of liberty is stronger than the will of tyranny. Last year's revolution was a powerful example of freedom and democracy in action and an inspiration to those aspiring for freedom in their own land.

Ukraine's leadership now faces an historic opportunity and has an historic responsibility to fulfill the promise of the Orange Revolution and continue to transform Ukraine into a fully democratic state. The United States will continue to support the efforts of President Viktor Yushchenko in advancing a democratic, prosperous, and secure Ukraine, and America is proud to call Ukraine a friend.

Laura and I send our best wishes on this special occasion.

GEORGE W. BUSH

Bookmark and Share

Yushchenko Urges Ukrainians To Be Patient

KIEV, Ukraine -- President Viktor Yushchenko, marking the first anniversary of the Orange Revolution that helped bring him to power, said Tuesday that Ukrainians should be proud of the past year's accomplishments and they should be patient while reforms continue.

Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko, during an interview with The Associated Press in Kiev, Ukraine, Tuesday, Nov. 22, 2005

"There is no disappointment here," Yushchenko told The Associated Press in an interview in his office before celebrations marking the anniversary in downtown Kiev.

The euphoria that followed the one-time opposition figure's dramatic rise to the presidency has been followed by wide dissatisfaction with slower-than-desired reforms and infighting in his government.

Yushchenko, in the interview, said: "We have all that we need for change."

"Of course, it is difficult to change a country in 10 months," said Yushchenko, wearing a tie in the shade of bright orange.

Yushchenko took office in January after winning a court-ordered new election following disputed balloting that brought hundreds of thousands of his supporters into downtown Kiev for weeks of protest.

"Ukraine, maybe, has lived through the happiest year in its history," Yushchenko said, acknowledging that nostalgia was running high, especially Tuesday.

Thousands descended on Independence Square on Tuesday to mark the anniversary, many waving orange flags and wearing orange scarves.

"To be in opposition against somebody and ... make good speeches is one thing," he told AP. "To enter office and do what is sometimes a rather gray job is another issue, but it is important this work be effective and professional."

Yushchenko insisted that tasks remaining to be done, such as judicial reform and eliminating corruption, were to solve problems he inherited.

"They were not created by Independence Square," Yushchenko said.

One issue that continues to haunt Yushchenko is the breakup of the Orange Revolution partners, particularly his fallout with the popular politician, Yulia Tymoshenko, who has moved into the opposition since Yushchenko fired her as prime minister in September.

"It is pity that mutual accusations were put forward, which caused both teams to lose their reputations," Yushchenko said. "Today when we talk about the revolution anniversary, I'd like all sides to use it to form one voice on the square, for each political force despite the personal ambitions of its leader to understand a very simple thing: Only solidarity brings success."

Yushchenko's party is in talks with Tymoshenko's bloc about reuniting in a coalition after March's parliamentary election, but Tymoshenko's demand that she again become prime minister remains a stumbling block.

He said he could work with her again "if the mistakes that were made were taken into account."

Source: AP

Bookmark and Share

Ukraine Marks Orange Anniversary

KIEV, Ukraine -- Crowds of Ukrainians waving orange flags descended on Kiev's main square Tuesday for anniversary celebrations marking the start of the Orange Revolution -- the weeks of mass protests over election fraud that ushered opposition leaders into power.

A light snow fell as supporters, bundled up in orange scarves, waited for the celebrations and a speech by President Viktor Yushchenko at Independence Square, the epicenter of last November's protests.

The festivities have been muted by disappointment among Ukrainians at the failure since last year's upheaval to achieve rapid progress in eliminating the poverty and widespread corruption in this former Soviet republic.

But Yushchenko, who defeated his Russian-backed rival on a platform promising to bring Ukraine closer to the West, told The Associated Press in an interview just hours before the event that there was much for Ukraine to be proud of.

"There is no disappointment, and there could not be. It is difficult to change a country in 10 months," he said, wearing a tie in the shade of bright orange that was his campaign's emblem.

His one-time Orange Revolution ally and now a chief political competitor after bitter rivalry drove them apart, Yulia Tymoshenko, also was expected to address the crowd.

"It was a turning point in the life of the nation," said Dasha Lysenko, a 17-year-old student who spent two months in the opposition tent camps last year. "We stood on the square not for politicians but for the ideals, for freedom."

A column of hundreds of Yushchenko's supporters from western Ukraine marched down Kiev's main street, temporarily snarling traffic. Yushchenko's party representatives handed out orange scarves in Independence Square.

As evening fell, the square began to fill with people although numbers were far short of the massive crowds that rallied in downtown Kiev a year ago.

Last November, millions jammed Kiev's streets to protest against election fraud in the bitter election. They chanted "Yu-shchen-ko!" and set up a sprawling tent camp, bringing life in this capital city of more than 2 million people to a halt.

A repeat runoff ordered by the Supreme Court ultimately resulted in Yushchenko's election.

Officials worried that leftists and those who opposed the Orange Revolution will try to disrupt Tuesday's celebrations.

More than 1,000 police were on guard Tuesday. Last year, few police were visible.

The mostly peaceful preparations were slightly shadowed by police arresting up to 10 Russian Orthodox believers on their way to the stage where Yushchenko was expected to address the crowd.

Some 25 faithful, mostly elderly women singing church songs, carried church flags, icons and the blue-and-white flags of the presidential campaign of Yushchenko's main rival last year, then-Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych. Police surrounded them and shoved them into the police van.

Police were unavailable for immediate comment about the incident.

Source: AP

Bookmark and Share

Ukrainians Mark "Orange Revolution" Protests

KIEV, Ukraine -- Flanked by hundreds of police, Ukrainians descended on Kiev's main square Tuesday for an anniversary celebration of the Orange Revolution mass demonstrations one year ago.

Orange-clad crowds poured into central Kiev to mark the first anniversary of Ukraine's 'orange revolution,' the mass protests that ousted an entrenched pro-Russian regime, installed pro-Western President Viktor Yushchenko in power and deeply split the nation

A column of hundreds of President Viktor Yushchenko's supporters from western Ukraine marched down Kiev's main street. On Independence Square - the epicenter of the protests - Yushchenko's party representatives handed out orange scarves.

Many supporters waved orange flags and were bundled up in orange scarves against the chill November morning.

"It was a turning-point in the life of the nation," said Dasha Lysenko, a 17-year-old student who spent two months in the opposition tent camps last year. "We stood on the square not for politicians but for the ideals, for freedom."

Buses full of sleepy, tired-eyed police waited on side streets, and metal barricades were being put up along the main avenue. Last year, few police were visible, but this year more than 1,000 officers were expected to patrol the event.

The celebrations were slated to include speeches by President Viktor Yushchenko, who now faces sagging popularity among Ukrainians disillusioned by persistent corruption and by the lack of progress since last year's upheaval. His one-time Orange Revolution ally and now chief political competitor, Yulia Tymoshenko, was also expected to address the crowd.

Last November, millions jammed Kiev's streets to protest against election fraud in the bitter election. They chanted "Yu-shchen-ko!" and set up a sprawling tent camp, bringing life in this capital city of more than 2 million to a halt.

A repeat runoff ordered by the Supreme Court ultimately resulted in Yushchenko's election.

Source: AP Wire

Bookmark and Share

Freedom Day for Ukraine and Russia

MOSCOW, Russia -- Ukraine’s Orange Revolution has discredited itself over the past year — this seems to be common knowledge in and around the Kremlin. The Ukrainians must envy the solid stability of President Putin.


Indeed, Ukraine today lacks much of what is the Kremlin takes pride in. Things like huge supplies of oil and natural gas. Like the power vertical — a multi-level system of bribes accumulation and distribution. Like the Public Chamber. Like the Council on National Projects Realization.

President Yushchenko

However Ukraine has something that Russia today does not and could not possibly have. Like freedom of speech. On any TV channel, in any newspaper any politician or just anyone can criticize the authorities as harshly as he chooses. And nobody from the Presidential Service would start calling the editorial office, hysterically demanding to “stop the provocation”.

The post-revolutionary Ukraine also has real political competition. The opposition’s parties — Viktor Yanukovich’s the Regions Party and Yulia Tymoshenko’s Batkivshina today top the public opinion polls, and for some reason nobody expects the existing authorities to cancel their registration, ban them access to the media and arrest their sponsors.

In Ukraine a very high ranked official can be fired if suspected of corruption or professional inefficiency — something that never happens in Russia. On September, 8 president Viktor Yushchenko, who the Kremlin thinks is weak and useless, sacked Yulia Tymoshenko’s government, two of his closest aides and several more businessmen-ministers who received their positions as a gratitude for help in the revolution.

Ukraine has other achievements. In February 2005 this poor, energy dependent country set the newborn child benefit at 8,000 hryvnas, or $1,600. In Russia, rich and oil-wealthy, the newborn child benefit is 8,000 rubles, or $285.

On October 24 Ukraine signed the first honest and effective privatization deal to be signed in a post-Soviet country: 92 percent of Krivorozhstal shares were sold to an Indian investor for $4.8 billion. In June 2004 — only 16 months before that — the “wise” pro-Kremlin Viktor Yanukovich government managed to receive only $800 million, six times less, for the same asset.

It is worth mentioning that the transparent Krivorozhstal privatization almost coincided with the not so transparent Sibneft nationalization. Sibneft, that the government sold in 1995 for $100 million, was bought back from Roman Abramovich’s offshores for $13.1 billion. I can see the Kremlin’s point when it prohibited its representatives to comment on the Krivorozhstal tender.

The Krivirizhstal story has proved that Ukraine is finally starting to separate power from property. Former proprietors, classical post-Soviet oligarchs Rinat Akhmetov and Viktor Pinchuk did their best to wreck the tender. They even got a statement from the Rada — Ukrainian Parliament. But the tender did take place and Lakshmi Mittal, that paid the market price for the asset, will only be a proprietor — it’s definitely not going to take over Ukraine, place its people in Parliament and appoint its loyal men ministers.

Viktor Yushchenko has also managed to stabilize Ukraine’s position in the world. The fact that the U.S. Senate is canceling the Jackson-Vinnick amendment exactly one year after the revolution speaks for itself. In the past year Ukraine has secured the niche of the leading post-Soviet country — the niche that seemed to have always belonged to Russia.

Of course the new authorities have made their mistakes. One of them was the arrest of the opposition’s Boris Kolesnikov and Yevgeny Kyshnarev. But both politicians were freed long ago and are now getting ready for the parliamentary elections, not for moving to the uranium mines.

I have all the reasons to say — Yushchenko, criticized by everybody, full of drawbacks, the man who literally lost his face — this man did for Ukraine too much of what Vladimir Putin promised to do for Russia, but never managed to. All that is left for the Kremlin now is to tell tales of the miserable Ukraine that is sinking rapidly.

The Stable Chaos

Another fairytale the Kremlin spin doctors tell us is that Ukraine is on the verge of sinking in the chaos of confrontation between its Eastern and Western parts. Indeed there are serious cultural contradictions between Ukraine’s East and West. Moreover, both the parts are complicated in their own structure too. Different researchers count up to ten so-called political and mental clusters in Ikraine: Kiev, Galichina, Don region, the Crimea etc.

Ukraine only started to exist within its current borders as a separate state in 1991. Bits of several ruined empires were hard to put together. In the beginning of 1990s Ukraine was facing a serious risk of disintegration.

These times are gone. Ukraine is still far from a politically united nation, and the leading political forces still tend to represent the will of separate regions and not the society in general. It was this way at the 2004 elections, it’s going to be this way in 2006 too. Regions fight for the all-Ukrainian power, the president’s post and right to form the government — but they are not struggling to get separated from the country.

Russia’s fate looks much more pessimistic in this respect. Under the virtually-cleptocratic power vertical, two instability factors are gaining power: the Caucasian terrorism and the Chinese expansion in the Far East. These two processes are a real threat to the unity and integrity of our state. However the subjects of these processes do not sit in Parliament and do not have any legal status at all, noreover, they don’t seem to need it.

So in the stability rating I would rank Ukraine more stable than Russia.

25 Kinds of Non-Freedom

Russia’s political elite is sensitive about what’s happening in Ukraine, not just because it bet on the wrong horse at the 2004 elections and lost. Also because the Orange Revolution and what followed it brought out the serious differences between the Russian and Ukrainian elites.

Putin is the smallest evil — this is what Putin’s stability apologists keep saying recently. What they mean is this: we have always dreamed of having 25 kinds of sausage in our shops, a round-the-clock bar in the National Hotel and trips abroad. Freedom, democracy, national interests — we only brought those in for better PR. So let us bless the authorities that give us 25 kinds of sausage and trips abroad, and let us forget about Russia’s future!

Ukraine’s political and intellectual elite consists of all kinds of people — liberals and socialists, Russian- and Ukrainian-speaking, those who fancy unity with Russia and pro-Western activists. But there are two things uniting these people. The first is — Ukraine’s statehood is a priority. The second thing is the question: what have you done for Ukraine? These two things were behind the orange Revolution. It wasn’t organized as the paranoid Kremlin says, by American spies. It was organized by people who desired freedom in their own independent state.

Ukraine is the mirror that shows Russia’s post-Soviet elite’s own swollen, distorted, both scared and cunning ugly face. This is why we are so jealous of Ukraine. This is why those who choose 25 kinds of slavery as their life goal feel so bad about November, 22. The freedom day.

Source: MosNews

Bookmark and Share

Analysis: Yanukovych Tops Ukraine's Polls

MOSCOW, Russia -- Ukrainians will elect a new parliament in March and one-time prime minister and former presidential candidate Viktor Yanukovych heads the political party leading the polls.

Viktor Yanukovych (L) and Viktor Yushchenko (R)

The "Orange Revolution" that delivered Viktor Yushchenko to the presidency is in disarray, and has given Yanukovych an election platform full of irony: Campaigning against the corruption and incompetence of the ruling elite.

According to a recent public opinion poll conducted by the Razumkov Center, Yanukovych's Party of the Regions tops voter preference for the slated March 26 parliamentary election with 17.5 percent. The People's Union-Our Ukraine electoral bloc that includes Yushchenko as its honorary chairman is second with 13.5 percent and the Batkivshchina (Fatherland) Party of former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko close behind at 12.4 percent.

Ukraine's other parties represented in parliament -- Communist Party of Ukraine, the Socialist Party of Ukraine and the People's Party of speaker of parliament Volodymyr Lytvyn -- polled above the necessary 3 percent to wins seats in the next legislature. Other polls put the blocs that support Yushchenko and Tymoshenko in a dead heat or the latter slightly ahead.

Topping the polls and connecting with the electorate have never been as important for Ukraine's political parties. As part of the behind closed-doors negotiations during last December's "Orange Revolution," Ukraine will, as of Jan. 1, change from being a semi-presidential political system to one dominated by a parliamentary-presidential form of government. With Yushchenko and Tymoshenko now political opponents, Yanukovych seeks to take advantage of the split in the "orange" coalition.

Parliament will determine who occupies government ministries and who will be prime minister -- currently decisions made by the president. The parliament also may be able to force the president to hand over many of the powers that have slowly fallen to the presidency over the years, though they legally belong to parliament or the prime minister. There should be no doubt that that Yanukovych and his allies have been patiently waiting for these changes

New parliamentary rules mandate the party that garners the most votes will have the right to determine who will be named prime minister. This may or may not happen if Yanukovych's Party of the Regions wins the largest number of votes. Irrespective of the rule, Yanukovych is angling to make a political come back with popular support.

In September, Yushchenko fired the entire Cabinet, replacing Prime Minister Tymoshenko and his former comrade-in-arms with Dnipropetrovs'k Gov. Yuri Yekhanurov. Yushchenko's government had been severely criticized for not addressing what the "Orange Revolution" was supposed to end: Endemic corruption and political favoritism. Yushchenko's chief of staff, Olexander Zinchenko, who resigned and initiated the Cabinet shake-up, has accused national security secretary Petro Poroshenko of bribery, media intrusion and obstructing the justice system. Poroshenko resigned, but remains a political insider Yushchenko appears unwilling or unable to shake-off. This is Yushchenko's biggest problem, Tymoshenko's issue to manipulate and Yanukovych's very passive message to tell voters, "I told you so."

Yushchenko has shown himself to be an indecisive and incoherent politician. Kiev's voters would probably consider his greatest accomplishment to be ridding the city of its corrupt traffic cops, but that was not what the "Orange Revolution" was all about. The "Orange Revolution" was originally about Ukrainians demanding something be done about the country's worst malady -- corruption in the political elite as the result of a few oligarchs controlling the economy and state.

When she was prime minister, Tymoshenko played the anti-corruption and nationalist card to the detriment of the economy. Her calls to revisit thousands of privatization deals of state assets scared off foreign investors and the dramatic increase of social payments stoked inflation. During Tymoshenko's tenure in office, Ukraine's GDP annual growth nose-dived from 12 percent to 4 percent.

Yanukovych is sitting pretty and has good reason to do so. Waiting on the sidelines and watching the former opposition -- now divided -- appeal to the electorate, Yanukovych is slowly consolidating his support as the leader of the Regions of Ukraine party. He was partially rehabilitated when Tymoshenko's government was dismissed and his September "Memorandum of Understanding" with Yushchenko returned him to public eye in a positive way and damaged Yushchenko's reputation among his core supporters. Accusing both Tymoshenko and Yushchenko of running a lawless government, many Ukrainians disappointed with the "Orange Revolution" appear to be listening.

Source: UPI

Bookmark and Share

Monday, November 21, 2005

U.S. Senate Approves Motion Seeking Jackson-Vanik Repeal for Ukraine

WASHINGTON, DC -- The U.S. Senate approved a motion seeking to repeal the Jackson-Vanik provision on Ukraine, a sign that trade restrictions imposed 31 years ago may soon end, RIA Novosti, a Russian newswire, reported Saturday.


The motion will have to be approved by the House of Representatives and signed by U.S. President George W. Bush in order to take affect.

Ukraine’s Foreign Ministry, in a statement issued on Sunday, said the development underscores a growing strategic partnership between Ukraine and the U.S.

“This is a long awaited step that will remove a problem in bilateral relations,” the ministry said in the statement posted on its website.

The Jackson-Vanik provision, part of the 1974 Trade Act, was originally imposed on the Soviet Union to punish it for its refusal to let Jews emigrate to Israel and the United States.

The provision barred the Soviet Union — and, after the 1991 communist collapse, the 15 independent, post-Soviet states — from gaining most-favored-nation status. In recent years, some of the post-Soviet states have been “graduated” from Jackson-Vanik. Others, such as Russia and Ukraine, receive yearly waivers.

While the trade measure has no direct economic impact, it retains symbolic power that, many Ukrainians insist, deters foreign companies from investing in the country.

Lifting the provision was one of the key issues that had been negotiated between Ukraine and the U.S. over the past several years. Other issues include granting a market economy status to Ukraine and support for the country’s joining of the World Trade Organization before the end of the year.

All these issues have been most recently discussed during a visit by Prime Minister Yuriy Yekhanurov to Washington earlier this month.

Ukraine has been rapidly moving towards greater cooperation with the U.S. following a victory by Viktor Yushchenko, a pro-Western politician, at presidential election a year ago. Yushchenko asked for repealing the provision while addressing a joint session of Congress during his visit to the U.S. in April.

Curt Weldon (R-Pa.), a prominent backer of lifting the provision, said in a recent interview with The Hill, an official publication of the Congress: “It’s really an embarrassment that when Yushchenko was here we didn’t get that bill up on the floor.”

While most members of the House International Relations Committee and Senate Foreign Relations Committee — Republicans and Democrats alike — support lifting Jackson-Vanik from Ukraine and Russia, some members believe the measure is a useful bargaining chip.

Source: Ukrainian Journal

Bookmark and Share

Year On, Mystery Still Shrouds Poisoning Of Ukraine's President

KIEV, Ukraine -- More than a year after Ukraine President Viktor Yushchenko ingested a massive dose of dioxin, mystery still shrouds the poisoning that covered his movie-star handsome face with scars and blisters.

"I am a man like any other. I'd like to wake up with a different face," Yushchenko told reporters recently. "But I know that tomorrow and the day after tomorrow it will be the same. Only afterwards will it change. Psychologically, it's not easy to live because I'm not used to it."

The poisoning of the popular opposition leader in the middle of last year's presidential election campaign played a key role during the "orange revolution" protests that he launched against the entrenched regime after it had rigged the results of the ballot.

To his supporters, Yushchenko's scarred and bloated face served as a potent symbol of that regime during the protests that captured headlines both at home and abroad.

But nearly 10 months after Yushchenko assumed power, how and by whom he was poisoned still remains unknown.

Yushchenko fell ill a day after having dinner with a former chief of Ukraine's SBU security service on September 5, 2004. His condition steadily deteriorated until five days later he was rushed in critical condition to a clinic in Austria where he remained for nearly three weeks.

The doctors there were initially baffled at what had caused the swelling of his liver, pancreas and intestines and only in December announced that Yushchenko had ingested a massive dose of dioxin, a toxin that can cause cancer and death.

Yushchenko had been comfortably leading his election rival, then prime minister Viktor Yanukovich, when he fell sick and his absence from the stump weeks before the first round of voting saw Yanukovich -- with the state media's overt help -- make up a double-digit gap in opinion polls and actually pull ahead.

Well before the final diagnosis from the Vienna clinic, Yushchenko accused the former regime of being behind the incident.

"What happened to me was linked to a political regime in Ukraine," he told Ukrainian lawmakers, who were visibly shocked at his changed appearance, days after returning home from the Austrian clinic.

"I believe now more and more that what happened to me was an act of a settling of political scores," Yushchenko said in early December. "The aim was to kill me."

During and immediately after the "orange revolution" speculations regularly appeared in the press about the poisoning, including one that Russian secret services were behind the affair.

But although Yushchenko at first hinted that the poison had come from abroad, he later said that the laboratory that produced it was in fact in Ukraine.

Yushchenko and his allies blame the lack of progress in the case on the former prosecutor general, Svyatoslav Piskun, whom the president fired in mid-October.

"I spoke with the ex-prosecutor general on this topic many times and he assured me that everything was done as it should have been," Oleg Rybachuk, Yushchenko's chief of staff, told AFP. "He simply lied."

Piskun has denied such charges.

"That is all lies and gibberish by those who want to remove me," he told reporters after his firing.

Meanwhile Yushchenko, who insists that he is in excellent health, continues to undergo regular tests in a Swiss clinic and has recently submitted fresh samples for the criminal investigation of the poisoning.

"I hope that with the change of the prosecutor general, the group that is looking into this will be seriously changed," he told AFP in an interview. "Wherever the trail leads, the prosecutors should issue their verdict."

Source: AFP

Bookmark and Share

Hundreds of Leftists Rally in Ukraine

KIEV, Ukraine -- Hundreds of leftists waving Russian flags rallied in Ukraine's capital Sunday to condemn the country's plans to celebrate the anniversary of last year's Orange Revolution.

"There is nothing to be proud of, we sold out our country," Viktoriya Vasilenko, 20, said as she shook wet snowflakes off her hat. She added that President Viktor Yushchenko "is a traitor."

The rally's organizer, the radical Progressive Socialist Party, supports warm ties with Russia and is wary of closer relations with the West.

Sunday's protest came two days ahead of Ukraine's official celebrations marking the beginning of last year's Orange Revolution mass protests, which helped usher the pro-Western Yushchenko into power. Yushchenko said Saturday he hopes to make Nov. 22 an annual holiday called Freedom Day.

"Yushchenko out!" shouted hundreds of protesters, some carrying portraits of Russian czars and Soviet dictator Josef Stalin. Representatives of losing presidential candidate Viktor Yanukovych handed out leaflets condemning the holiday plan.

Vasilenko and her grandmother, Margarita, said they came to Sunday's protest because of their anger over last month's sale of a Ukrainian steel mill to the world's largest steel producer, Mittal Steel. Mittal, a multinational firm, bought the Kryvorizhstal mill for $4.8 billion in an open auction that Yushchenko hailed as one of the biggest economic successes of his first year in office.

"Why should we be selling our birthright to foreigners," the grandmother said.

The Progressive Socialists had promised that Sunday's rally would attract some 25,000 people, but at its peak only a couple of thousand gathered.

Source: AP

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, November 20, 2005

Orange Believers Losing Faith

KIEV, Ukraine -- One recent rainy day, Natalya Simonenko was suddenly overcome with nostalgia for the time she spent on Independence Square a year ago.

A year later, many of these people have lost faith in the Orange Revolution leaders

She opened the drawer where she kept last year's Orange Revolution memorabilia -- orange ribbons, a mug with President Viktor Yushchenko's portrait, an orange scarf, several orange flags and her favorite orange sweater -- and decided to throw them all into the trash.

"It was the right place for them, I felt relieved afterward. I couldn't even imagine myself throwing these things away before, but now ... " she said, her voice trailing off.

Simonenko, 26, a businesswoman from the Black Sea port of Odessa, was one of the many thousands of orange-clad people who last year crammed Kiev's central Independence Square to protest the fraudulent Nov. 21, 2004, runoff election that gave victory to then-Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych. After two weeks of continuous protests -- often in freezing temperatures -- the election result was overturned, and in December Yushchenko was elected president in a rerun of the vote.

Like many participants in the protests, Simonenko hoped that Yushchenko would put an end to the cronyism and corruption under his predecessor, Leonid Kuchma.

But a year later, the mood of the participants in the Orange Revolution has switched from one of initial euphoria to deep disappointment, with many of those who took to the streets in protest now seeing no difference between the old and the new ruling elites.

And the team of Yushchenko and Yulia Tymoshenko, the hero and the heroine of Independence Square, are seen by many of their former supporters as failing to keep their promises.

Orange, the emblematic color of Yushchenko's supporters, is hardly seen on the streets of Kiev anymore, while opinion polls show that Ukrainians increasingly think the country is headed in the wrong direction.

"I was one of the few in Odessa to support Yushchenko; I traveled to Kiev to demonstrate," Simonenko said during a recent trip to the capital. "I used to argue with my family and my neighbors who supported Yanukovych. I wanted the country to change, but after a year I see that nothing has, corruption is still high, and the oligarchs are still running things."

In response to allegations of corruption within his inner circle, in September Yushchenko fired his government, including Tymoshenko, his prime minister, and his close ally Petro Poroshenko, head of the National Security and Defense Council, who was one of the main sponsors of his presidential campaign.

Yushchenko then struck an alliance with former opponent Yanukovych in an effort to secure the parliament's approval for his choice as prime minister, Russian-born technocrat Yuriy Yekhanurov.

Yekhanurov, who is close to Kuchma, was seen as a compromise candidate who could act as an intermediary between Yushchenko and the Dnipropetrovsk-based clan of Kuchma's son-in-law, oligarch Viktor Pinchuk. From 1994 to 1997 -- a time when several of the country's oligarchs made their fortunes -- Yekhanurov was responsible for overseeing the privatization of several large state enterprises.

Yanukovych is seen as representing the interests of the Donetsk clan, headed by Ukraine's richest man, Rynat Akhmetov. The Donetsk and Dnipropetrovsk clans are among the several geographically defined oligarchic groups that during Kuchma's rule competed for control over the country's business and politics.

In their September pact, Yushchenko and Yanukovych agreed that there would no be prosecutions for electoral fraud from last year's elections, a move seen as a betrayal by those who helped Yushchenko to become president.

"The present authorities have failed to do anything 'orange people' would be proud of," said Pavlo Zubyuk, 23, a member of the Pora, or It's Time, youth group that organized many of last year's protests. "Even those who rigged the election results will not be punished. This is not what we were promised."

Since last December, Pora has split organizationally into two wings. One, known as the black Pora, has remained a pressure group, while the other, known as the yellow Pora, is running in next March's parliamentary elections as a political party.

On Sunday, Ukraine will mark the official anniversary of the Orange Revolution. As part of the celebrations, soup kitchens and a huge stage will be set up on Independence Square, just as they were during last year's street protests.

Despite her split with Yushchenko, Tymoshenko said that she would take part in the anniversary. Yushchenko's Our Ukraine party, which is organizing the celebrations, said all those who supported his presidential campaign had been invited.

The black Pora, however, said it would hold a separate demonstration to press Yushchenko to fulfill his election promises.

Last year Nadya Prudyak, 24, now a leading black Pora member, was one of those who slept out in the tents on the square.

She canvassed for Yushchenko at the city's universities -- a job that she said had now left a bad taste in her mouth.

"Much of the old system we were fighting has remained. We were fighting not because we liked Yushchenko but because we hoped for big political changes. We wanted to get rid of the players of Kuchma's era, but nothing has changed," she said.

Many former Orange Revolution supporters blame not only Yushchenko for dashing of their dreams -- they blame Tymoshenko's government too, for allowing inflation to rise and failing to maintain living standards.

The new government initially raised pensions and salaries, but Tymoshenko and Yushchenko fell out over how to deal with the thorny issue of the Kuchma-era privatizations, when insiders laid their hands on large chunks of state industry in cut-rate deals. Tymoshenko called for hundreds of deals to be annulled, but Yushchenko favored a softer approach.

Government interference in the economy was blamed for scaring off investors and prompting an increase in food and gas prices. The economy has grown by less than 4 percent this year -- a shocking decline from last year's 12 percent growth.

During last year's protests, Yulia Artushenko, 59, a resident of Ukrainka, a small town 40 kilometers outside Kiev, brought fresh pies she had baked to the people on Independence Square. Now, she said, her enthusiasm has "completely gone."

"I believed in that revolution so much," she said. "I really wanted to live in a new country, but the only things that have changed are that food prices have gone up and that it's more difficult for pensioners to live now."

Scandals surrounding Yushchenko's government have also played their part in turning his former supporters against him.

In one particularly high-profile case, the high-rolling lifestyle of Yushchenko's son Andriy came under scrutiny as many asked where a 19-year-old student had come by a $100,000 BMW, an expensive cell phone and money to spend in Kiev's most fashionable nightclubs.

The online newspaper Ukrayinska Pravda, which supported Yushchenko's election campaign, was the first to raise the issue. But at a news conference, Yushchenko angrily accused one of the newspaper's reporters of being on someone's payroll.

"This is not what we expected from Yushchenko," said the paper's chief editor, Alyona Prytula. "When he was running for president, he promised that he would make public the incomes of all his family, but we're still waiting for that."

Prytula founded the newspaper five years ago with investigative reporter Heorhiy Gongadze in an effort to expose corruption under Kuchma's regime. In November 2000, Gongadze's headless body was found outside Kiev, and Kuchma was accused of involvement in the killing. Kuchma has denied any wrongdoing.

Soon after Yushchenko was elected, he pledged to find and punish those responsible for Gongadze's murder, but it remains unsolved.

"Yushchenko gave his word that Heorhiy's killers would be found, but he hasn't been able to carry out his promise," Prytula said.

Now, she said, the newspaper has broken with Yushchenko and is in opposition again.

"I'm tired of leading the opposition media. What I want is to be part of the normal media in a normal country," Prytula said.

The only positive change under Yushchenko, she said, is that the press is free -- and that journalists are no longer afraid of being killed if they criticize the president.

The sense of disillusionment appears reflected in recent polls, such as one carried out last month of 2,100 people by the Ukrainian Institute of Social Research. It found that 20 percent of respondents planned to vote for Yanukovych's Regions Party in March's parliamentary elections, while 13.8 percent said they would vote for Tymoshenko's bloc and just 12.3 percent for Yushchenko's Our Ukraine party.

In Simonenko's hometown of Odessa, where most residents speak Russian as their first language and Yanukovych won about 70 percent of the vote in last year's elections, she said friends and neighbors now laugh at her for supporting the protests.

"They say, 'So, what happened with your beloved Yushchenko?' It's so disappointing," Simonenko said.

She said the upcoming elections left her cold.

"I don't even know whom to vote for," she said. "What choice is there anymore?"

Source: The Moscow Times

Bookmark and Share

Tymoshenko: Court Has Cleared Her Of Old Criminal Cases

KIEV, Ukraine -- Ukraine's former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko said the Supreme Court had canceled decade-old criminal cases against her and her family a victory for the charismatic politician who aims to get her job back in spring elections.

Fired PM Yulia Tymoshenko

"This finally brings this to an end," she said Saturday. Tymoshenko was a key figure in last year's Orange Revolution, but was fired as prime minister in September after a split with one-time ally President Viktor Yushchenko.

The criminal cases against the former energy executive began in 1995, and continued to accumulate in 2001 after she had a falling-out with former President Leonid Kuchma and was ousted from his government.

She and other family members were jailed briefly on charges of bribery, money-laundering, corruption and abuse of power.

"We all suffered through this ... but I'm proud of us and our supporters. We weren't broken," said Tymoshenko's husband, who went into hiding after being put on the wanted list in 2003. He said he spent the time in Ukraine and was recognized on the streets.

Tymoshenko showed reporters the court order canceling all the criminal cases. The Supreme Court could not be contacted for comment Saturday.

Recent opinion polls suggest that none of the three main blocs Yushchenko's, Tymoshenko's and that led by losing presidential candidate Viktor Yanukovych will win enough votes to form a majority on their own.

Tymoshenko has said she hopes to form a coalition with Yushchenko, but insisted that she would not make a concession, such as yielding the prime minister's job. Both former allies share a pro-Western outlook, in contrast to Yanukovych's Russian-leaning sympathies, but personal rivalries have come between them.

Yushchenko's party has also said it would support a coalition with Tymoshenko, and preliminary talks got under way Saturday.

"It is becoming clear that the election will be about who becomes prime minister," she said. "The people will chose. It won't be a decision made behind-the-scenes."

Tymoshenko, meanwile, confirmed that she plans to participate in Tuesday's celebrations marking the anniversary of last year's Orange Revolution. "I couldn't not be on the square," said Tymoshenko, who played a key role in keeping up morale during last year's election fraud protests, reported AP.

Source: Pravda

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, November 19, 2005

One Year On, The Orange Uprising Leaves A Bitter Aftertaste

KIEV, Ukraine -- It was late evening one year ago when the Ukrainian opposition leader, Viktor Yushchenko, issued his rousing call for an uprising against the skewed election.

Viktor Yushchenko in the early days of the "Orange Revolution"

Andriy Chuprin, a burly 43-year-old entrepreneur, heard the rallying cry to Kiev's rain-lashed Independence Square on television at home in the suburbs. "I threw on my coat and took the last metro to Maidan," he remembers.

Only Andriy and a handful of shivering protesters kept vigil on that first night of November 21. But within days they were joined by half a million banner-waving Ukrainians, screaming for the presidential election that had awarded victory to prime minister Viktor Yanukovich to be overturned. "We wanted to live in a new democratic country without corruption and vote fraud," says Andriy.

For weeks the "orange revolution" dominated headlines across the world. In the end it swept Mr Yushchenko, a pro-western reformer, to the presidency.
Yet, one year on, the euphoria of that people-power victory has been transformed into bitter disappointment. An opinion poll this week indicated that 57% of Ukrainians think the orange promises have been broken. "It turned out our new leaders acted the same old way as their predecessors," says Andriy.

For two and a half months, he and thousands of others camped out in Kiev, refusing to accept Mr Yanukovich's victory after monitors reported gross election fraud. Dressed in the orange of Mr Yushchenko's Our Ukraine party, they cheered speeches by his charismatic ally Yulia Timoshenko, whose striking looks and traditional peasant braid made her the icon of the revolution.

The protesters were caked in grime, often cold and hungry, but their leaders buoyed them up with vows to sweep away the hardline regime of outgoing president and Soviet throwback Leonid Kuchma. "There was a great sense of brotherhood and hope," Andriy recalls.

Mr Yushchenko's victory sent his supporters home in rude spirits. But with revolutionary fervour seeping away, economic growth soon nosedived as arguments emerged between the orange leaders over the country's course. The pro-Russian south and east of the country, which supported Mr Yanukovich, retreated from threats to secede but claims of persecution persisted. And in September the fragile unity of Mr Yushchenko's team was finally exploded when his chief of staff resigned, accusing key figures of corruption.

The allegations - all denied and none yet proven - prompted two other high-ranking politicians to resign before the president stepped in to dismiss his prime minister, Ms Timoshenko, and her entire government. It emerged that she had been locked in a battle for influence with her one-time rival for the premiership, Petro Poroshenko, the head of the national defence and security council.

Furious, Ms Timoshenko responded to her sacking by accusing the president of "ruining our public unity" and promising to lead her parliamentary bloc in elections next March.

Maidan veterans have been left bewildered at the split between the stars of the protests, whose enmities are such that they have refused to stand together on stage during anniversary celebrations on Tuesday. Oksana Potapenko, 25, who helped coordinate supplies to the tent city, says: "A lot of people think Yushchenko treated Timoshenko very shabbily. He's not a messiah any more."

The president angered his supporters further when he signed a controversial memorandum - giving, among other concessions, immunity from prosecution to local councillors - with his former arch-foe, the pro-Russian Mr Yanukovich.

"You could call that agreement many things and betrayal is one of them," says Andriy Bondarenko, 34, an activist who pitched the first tent on Kiev's central street, Khreshchatyk. "We expected the bandits who led the election fraud would be put behind bars but that didn't happen because of political deals behind the scenes."

Claims that Russian oligarch Boris Berezovsky funded the orange camp were another blow. And Mr Yushchenko was forced to apologise for calling a journalist an "information killer" for exposing the lavish lifestyle of the president's 19-year-old son. In all, the scandals have put a big dent in Mr Yushchenko's popularity. A poll published this week showed support for his actions have plunged to 33%, down from 48% in February.

Oleksandr Zinchenko, the former presidential aide whose resignation triggered the government crisis, holds firm to his allegations that senior colleagues were running slush funds and extracting bribes from businessmen. "After the revolution we faced a huge test because we received this massive credit of trust and basically you could come into the office and do whatever you wanted. That was the danger. And some people did not pass that test," he says.

As politicians compete for the mantle of the revolution, all eyes have turned to the March elections. Recent constitutional changes mean a new prime minister with greatly increased powers will be chosen by parliamentary majority, making the campaign a scramble for power.

In the wake of their split, Mr Yushchenko's Our Ukraine bloc on 13.5% and the Timoshenko bloc on 12.4% now trail Mr Yanukovich, whose Party of the Regions leads the polls with 17.5%.

At his headquarters in central Kiev, Mr Yanukovich is no longer the morose figure who accepted defeat on New Year's Eve. His back is stiffened and he carries a new air of confidence.

"It was no surprise to me," he says of the orange leaders' messy break-up. "I expected conflicts would arise, I just didn't think it would happen so soon."

The anniversary will be a "shameful celebration" of a putsch, not a revolution, he says. "They have successfully destroyed a well-functioning economy. Excellent managers have been fired for their political beliefs. Prices have risen with high inflation. Salary growth has slowed by 30%. It's a huge impact on the lives of ordinary people."

Yet in Kiev a considerable minority say life has improved since the revolution. "Back then we had just one choice and we made the right one," says Bondarenko, who plans to run for parliament. "Now at least we have the beginnings of a new democracy."

Serhiy Leshchenko, the Ukrainskaya Pravda journalist who broke the scandal about Mr Yushchenko's son, agrees. "Press freedom has increased at least 500%."

Mr Yushchenko's new chief of staff, Oleh Rybachuk, claims the orange leaders are regrouping. "The emotions have cooled ... These are all responsible politicians and they clearly understand that the March elections will be the second part of the question, 'Yes or no to the future of Ukraine's development?' So, the team is getting back together."

But many Ukrainians remain sceptical. Max, a taxi driver, recalled the famous phrase of former Russian premier Viktor Chernomyrdin: "We hoped for better, but it turned out like always."

Source: Guardian Unlimited

Bookmark and Share

Europa: Ukrainian City Wants to Reclaim Its Past

LVIV, Ukraine -- Beautiful but poor is a common shorthand description of this city of 800,000 people in western Ukraine, and it takes only a few hours here to sense the accuracy of the phrase. Lviv, which was once as European as the Austro-Hungarian Empire and wishes to be part of Europe again, is not in Europe, at least not as defined by the border of the European Union, though it is a mere 70 kilometers from here.

The Lviv Opera House

This is the periphery. Here is where Europe officially ends, even if the end has an arbitrary, technical quality to it.

The plain fact is that there seems no particular coherence to the reality that the Polish city of Chelm, just on the other side of the Bug River from here, is part of Europe, while Lviv is not. Both, after all, were cities in the Austro-Hungarian province of Galicia, Lviv bigger and vastly more important than Chelm. Both were part of Poland for something on the order of 500 years, including at least a few decades of the 20th century, before the Nazis invaded and then Stalin moved the territory of Ukraine to the West, and Lviv became just another battered and tragic city in the Soviet Union.

But Lviv also reflects how borders become, as they say in the Middle East, "facts," and facts are reality, and Lviv's European aspiration takes place in defiance of some of the most important elements of that reality. It is a city in a different time zone from the EU, literally and figuratively, one hour later than Chelm, Krakow and, for that matter Madrid, a quarter-century or so behind in other measures.

In this sense, there isn't much news to report from Lviv, news in the conventional meaning of events, changes, upheavals, investments. To visit here, at least for me, was more to be reminded of the weight of recent history. Lviv belongs in Europe, and, as the acting mayor of the town, Zinovyj Siryk, confidently predicted of Ukraine in general, "After Poland, we are next."

But at the same time, there is so much heavy residue of the basic fact of Lviv's recent past: that it was ripped in an untimelyway from the European womb, and many things about it - from the Stalinist Greek temple airport with its columns and cupola to the generalized dilapidation - are emblems of that rupture.

"It's a real border, not just a line," Andrij Yurash, a scholar of religion at the university here said, referring to the nearby border with Poland. "There's a real difference economically," he continued, and he provided a striking statistic. According to Yurash, Lviv's city budget is about one-tenth that of Krakow, the other big formerly Galician city about 300 kilometers, nearly 200 miles, to the west of here in Poland.

"It's the heritage of the Soviet period," he said, "because the whole network of economic relations was destroyed here."

To walk the streets of Lviv, a year after Ukraine's Orange Revolution gave national expression to the country's preference for the European zone of civilization over the Russian, produces something akin to a time-capsule sensation. The airport, with its eerily near empty tarmac, reminded me a bit of China in the early 1980s, when that country was just emerging from its Stalinist-Maoist isolation.

The hotel I stayed in, the George, built around the turn of the 20th century to be the epitome of elegance and modernity, is spacious and grand. You could almost hear the Belle Époque music and the clinking of glasses when the Galician capital of Lviv was a major boom town of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Now the place, like Lviv itself, is clean and adequate, but threadbare, melancholy, eerily empty like the tarmac, practically calling out for an investor.

"We also think that Lviv was ripped away from Europe," Halyna Tershchuk, a reporter for Radio Liberty, the U. S.-sponsored radio network, said. "We would like Kiev to understand that the headquarters of European institutions have to be in Lviv. It must be a bridge between Europe and Ukraine. We need branches of banks here, diplomatic missions, trade organizations, hotel investments."

She said that in places like Poland, foreign investment in newspapers and broadcasting stations helped create independence in the news media, while in Ukraine in general, most of the press is too attached to particular political parties to be seen as genuinely independent.

A local historian, Vasyl Rasevych, gave a demographic dimension to the rupture with the past.

"You have to remember that after World War II, 90 percent of the population of Lviv changed," he said. "The Jews were eliminated. The Poles went to Poland. And before World War II, 50 percent of the population was Polish, 30 percent was Jewish."

When Stalin grabbed Western Ukraine for the Soviet empire, Red Army officers helped themselves to the homes and apartments of the city's better-off people. Factories were moved here with their personnel from farther east to replenish the depleted population.

"Up until the 1960s," Rasevych said, "Lviv was a Russian-speaking city."

Well, Lviv speaks Ukrainian now, which is an element of revival. I found it very moving in this city where some 200,000 Jews were annihilated to visit the kindergarten at Hesed Arje, the recently created Jewish community center, simply to see Jewish children playing, blissfully ignorant of course of the inconceivable starkness of the past.

Here and there in Lviv are other signs of renewal: the restoration of one of the city's many exquisite Italianate buildings, a new coffee shop, reminiscent of Vienna, even the McDonald's around the corner from the George Hotel. Still, there is nothing like the wholesale sandblasting and renewal that took place in, say, Prague after the communist dictators were thrown out there.

Lviv hasn't had a Soviet dictator for 15 years and, like the rest of Ukraine, it got rid of its pro-Russian autocrat, Leonid Kuchma, last year. Its many churches, including several world- class gems, are emblems of its European spirit, as is the big statue of the Polish poet Adam Mickiewicz right in the middle of the old city.

If the heavy hand of the Soviet dictatorship hadn't left such a powerful imprint on Lviv, where Joseph Roth went to university and where Sholom Aleichem, the originator of "Fiddler on the Roof," wrote some of his stories, this city would almost automatically belong to the European club. Maybe, as Acting Mayor Siryk predicted, Ukraine will be next. If that is the case, for Lviv, history will have been set right.

Source: International Herald Tribune

Bookmark and Share

Russia's Ukrainian Gamble

KIEV, Ukraine -- For the last 300 years, Ukrainian leaders have established a solid tradition of asking for assistance from their country's giant eastern neighbor in the resolution of all sorts of problems - be it a 17th century war with Poland or last year's presidential elections.

The Kremlin

Russia's endorsement of Ukrainian presidential candidate Viktor Yanukovych wasn't a success story, so the Kremlin is now trying to influence Ukrainian policy by ensuring seats for pro-Russian candidates in the Ukrainian parliament.

The stakes in Ukraine's parliamentary elections, scheduled for March 2006, are too high for Russia to sit on the sidelines. Whoever gets a majority will take all - the leading role in legislative decision making as well as the right to appoint a premier and most cabinet members.

Needless to say, people from the Kremlin will not miss a chance to guide the next head of government, especially if they feel that the winds of Ukrainian policy are blowing too westerly.

The Kremlin's best bets

The diversification of political tools of influence has become the Russian president's newest strategy. Political analyst Dmitriy Vydrin says that Vladimir Putin now "does his best to keep in touch with both the governing party and the opposition, no matter what country we are talking about.

For example, when he was in Germany, Putin had a meeting with his good friend Gerhard Schroder. But he also found time to meet opposition CDU leaders. Putin meets with the opposition just in case. The same mechanism works for Ukraine. He maintains ties with President Viktor Yushchenko, current Prime Minister Yury Yekhanurov and former Prime-Minister Yulia Tymoshenko. He also hasn't forgotten about his last endorsement - Yanukovych."

So, who can count on resources from the Kremlin this time around? The view put forward by Russian political specialists that Yushchenko will go to Moscow to ask Putin for financial support is not well founded. First of all, Yushchenko has always been seen as the Kremlin's ideological opponent and the White House's ally. Also, it is Yushchenko who has tried to put an end to the Ukrainian tradition of making political concessions to Moscow in return for economic benefits - a tradition dutifully observed and cherished by former Ukrainian President Leonid Kuchma.

In addition, personal relations between Yushchenko and Putin can't be called warm. Even if Yushchenko or his team can be said to be looking for financial assistance from Russia, it will likely not come from the Kremlin. The Ukrainian president isn't about to go north with his hat in his hand. However, he will probably do his best to keep his newest rival, Tymoshenko, from getting any foreign benefits.

Neither, though, can Tymoshenko be called the darling of Moscow. Until recently, her presence was more awaited there by Russian prosecutors, who accused her of bribing some of the country's top defense officials during her days in the gas trading business. The Russians kept the case open, and Tymoshenko stayed clear of Moscow, even after being appointed premier.

But soon after her dismissal in September, her relations with Vladimir Putin significantly improved. That same month, she paid a personal visit to the Kremlin, and Russian prosecutors closed the case - at least for now. According to a source from the Russian Presidential Administration, Putin himself initiated the meeting; however, the exact issues discussed remain undisclosed.

The media immediately suggested that Tymoshenko had come to ask for money to battle Yushchenko in the parliamentary race. Just before her visit, Tymoshenko had made a public statement calling for improved relations with Russia. She also mentioned the revival of the controversial Single Economic Space, a post-Soviet trade union that her pro-Western government had largely opposed. At first, this statement was seen as an attempt to garner votes in Eastern Ukraine (where Tymoshenko is from), but it later became obvious that this was a signal to Russia indicating that Yulia was ready to talk.

In examining the possibility of Tymoshenko being funded from Russia, one should bear in mind that Lady Yu has more enemies in the Kremlin than friends. It was only last summer that she faced off against Russian oil companies, which she threatened with price caps on gasoline in Ukraine.

Theoretically, Putin could place a small bet on her, since her ratings are running high and her ambitions to regain the premiership remain undaunted. But at stake is the interest of Russian companies operating in Ukraine, and everyone knows about Tymoshenko's passion for nationalizing already privatized companies.

In short, her trust factor is low. Experience has shown that even when playing in a team, Ms. Yu always manages to play her own game. Thus, Putin would hardly gamble on a horse that would sooner or later throw its rider and run off on its own.

Then there is Viktor Yanukovych, the failed endorsement of the Kremlin from last time around. He may ask for some donations from the Kremlin, as he is viewed as a favorite in Russian-speaking Eastern Ukraine. His electoral base is growing with each mistake made by Viktor Yushchenko. But with all this, he has zero chances of forming a majority in the new parliament, even if joined by other like-minded parties.

Any attempt to vote Yanukovych in as Prime Minister will be blocked by both Yushchenko and Tymoshenko. Thus, Putin could be just grooming Yanukovych as a lobbyist for Russian interests in the Parliament. Thus, the financial inflow to his election campaign from the Kremlin will not be that significant.

In the long run, Ukrainian political expert Vadim Karasiov sees the Kremlin's strategy towards Ukraine as one of 'influential non-intervention'. "Russia needs Ukrainian political elites to maintain the confrontational structure and institutional dualism. Thus, (Ukraine's) multi vector policy will be preserved."

At the same time, Russia will not be satisfied with the current geopolitical fragmentation, between east and west, but will be doing its best to ensure that several regional regimes in Ukraine are strengthened. "There will be a sort of political rather than administrative federalization in Ukraine. And Russia will be playing its own game with each regional subject."

In addition to his main hand, the parliamentary elections, Putin will play smaller but no less important hands - local elections. By supporting regional pro-Russian parties and blocs, the Russian leader will create a plethora of viable Russian lobbies across the country, which might turn out to be more effective than a single one in the national parliament.

Source: Ukrainian Observer

Bookmark and Share

Friday, November 18, 2005

Mr. Putin's Counter-Revolution

WASHINGTON, DC -- Unable to comprehend Ukraine's Orange Revolution, which began a year ago when hundreds of thousands of people took to the streets of Kiev to reject a fraudulent presidential election, Russia's ruling coterie invented a conspiracy theory.

Russian President Vladimir Putin

Western intelligence agencies, they reasoned, had poured money into Ukrainian civil society groups that were then used as fronts to organize the insurrection.

Only someone like President Vladimir Putin, an isolated former KGB agent with little taste for democracy, could embrace such a preposterous idea. Yet Mr. Putin's paranoia now is set to become the basis for a far-reaching crackdown on civil society in Russia. President Bush, who is to meet Mr. Putin tomorrow in South Korea, cannot ignore this assault on freedom.

Mr. Putin's initiative comes in the form of legislation abruptly introduced last week in parliament, which he already converted into a rubber stamp. The new law would require all 450,000 noncommercial associations in Russia to re-register with the government; force groups that until now have operated without registration to obtain one; and ban all organizations from using foreign funding for "political activity."

Chapters of foreign organizations, such as Human Rights Watch or the Carnegie Moscow Center, would be banned, as would foreign employees of nongovernmental organizations. In effect, the measure would drive most foreign NGOs out of Russia, make it impossible for foundations such as the National Endowment for Democracy to operate and subject all Russian civic groups to the whims of the secret police, who would be able to deny registration to any they deemed suspicious.

Russian officials pretend that the purpose of the legislation is to stop money laundering and other operations by terrorist organizations. But the real motive was stated publicly last week by one of the sponsors of the legislation, Alexei Ostrovsky, who told the newspaper Nezavismaya Gazeta that it "should help the government crack down on politically active NGOs that receive foreign funding and might use the money to promote an Orange revolution." Mr. Ostrovsky linked the bill to a meeting Mr. Putin had with human rights activists in July, in which the president declared that he would not tolerate foreign funding of NGOs.

In reality, the new law is part of a broader campaign by Mr. Putin to ensure that the corrupt autocracy he has created survives the next round of Russian elections for parliament and president in 2007 and 2008. Candidates who might challenge the regime, such as former prime minister Mikhail Kasyanov, are being threatened with criminal prosecution.

Now Mr. Putin plans to crush any possibility that Russians would respond to a rigged vote with their own democratic uprising, by eliminating any and all civic organizations deemed potentially unfriendly, including all those sponsored by the West. Russian experts say the law could be completed by Jan. 1, the day Mr. Putin's government is due to take over the chairmanship of the Group of Eight industrial nations.

Mr. Bush can look forward to toasting the unprecedented accession of a Russian president to leadership of what was once an exclusive club for democracies, even as Mr. Putin tears up the charters of the U.S. foundations, think tanks and human rights groups operating in Moscow. Is Mr. Bush really prepared to accept such a leader?

Source: Washington Post

Bookmark and Share

Ukraine's Reform Euphoria Falters

KIEV, Ukraine -- One cold day this fall, Inna Grigoryeva stepped out in her orange scarf, hoping it would add a bit of cheer to a gray day, and says she was overwhelmed by the smiles and affectionate looks from passersby.


A year after Ukraine's color-coded Orange Revolution, the excitement and ideals that brought hundreds of thousands of demonstrators to the capital's main square are already the stuff of orange-tinged nostalgia. Reality has taken on a darker hue, muddied by unfulfilled promises and fallible heroes.

"The fairy tale written on Independence Square now calls to mind a murder mystery. Only the victim isn't a person, but hope," said Andriy Yusov, a leading member of Pora, the youth group that was one of the driving forces in the protests.

As Ukraine prepares for Tuesday's anniversary, the revolution's leaders are divided against one another in a welter of allegations of corruption and influence-peddling. Those who hoped for a clean break from Russia and acceptance in the West feel let down, while in the Russian-speaking east of the country, many feel their country has been hijacked.

The magic may have faded, and the media may speculate that the anniversary celebrations will be less exuberant than might be expected, but Grigoryeva, a newspaper journalist, says the reactions to her scarf tell her that orange is still a potent symbol and that enough unity and goodwill is left to ensure that come Tuesday, "all of Kiev will be orange."

With opinion polls showing a majority thinks the country is headed in the wrong direction, there's a natural inclination to fall back on the heady days of last November.

"For maybe the first time, the whole world learned where Ukraine was--and not because of Chernobyl or some other catastrophe but because of the revolution ... it defined us," said Petro Poroshenko, a tycoon whose television station broke through the government's media blackout to show the nation of 47 million what was unfolding in Kiev.

The Orange Revolution began hours after the polls closed on the Nov. 21 presidential election. As the Central Election Commission began churning out fraudulent vote counts in favor of Russia's man, Viktor Yanukovych, reformist candidate Viktor Yushchenko summoned his own partisans to Independence Square.

They poured in, pitching hundreds of tents, setting up outdoor kitchens and vowing to stay until justice prevailed. Disciplined, cheerful, even picking up their cigarette butts, they demanded freedom and democracy. After 70 years as a Soviet republic, and 15 more feeling the rigors of the free market, many simply wanted Ukraine to be a normal European country.

"Yu-shchen-ko!" they chanted through the night. Sometimes it was more rock concert than revolution.

Riot police stood ready. Outgoing President Leonid Kuchma went on television and called for an end to "this so-called revolution." European envoys scrambled to mediate. Politicians in the Russian-speaking provinces talked secession.

Twelve days later, the Supreme Court declared the vote count fraudulent and ordered the election rerun.

On Dec. 26, Yushchenko won the rerun.

But the goodwill didn't last.

The revolutionaries were a mismatched group of reformers, socialists and populists united only by their hatred of Kuchma's corrupt regime. They inherited a nation divided between the pro-Russia east and the nationalist west.

Initially, the new government plunged into action by increasing pensions and salaries, sacking 18,000 bureaucrats and summoning former officials for questioning.

One of the most contentious issues was the murky privatization deals during the Kuchma era. Yulia Tymoshenko, the Yushchenko ally who had become prime minister, wanted hundreds of these deals revoked; Yushchenko resisted.

The Tymoshenko government's heavy hand spooked investors. Ukraine's economic growth slid below 4 percent.

In September, Yushchenko fired Tymoshenko.

Meanwhile, Ukrainians complain that the revolution has failed to deliver on promises to improve living standards and restore trust in government, and that it has been tarnished by corruption allegations and backroom political deals.

Source: AP

Bookmark and Share

Viktor Yushchenko's S-Class For Sale On Ebay

KIEV, Ukraine -- Do you have a million dollars burning a hole in your pocket? I know I sure do. Every morning I wake up, have a cup of coffee, and deliberate the perfect way to spend all those zeros.

Yushchenko's 1980 Mercedes S350

Finally, after much deliberation, I think I've found the answer. So what could it be? A new house? Nope. Maybe a mint condition all-original 300SL Gullwing, to match my shiny new Mercedes SLR McLaren? Wrong again.

The real gem I've discovered is a 1980 Mercedes S350 TD, owned by none other than Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko.

That's right ladies and gentlemen, I'm going to own Viktor's S-Class, but don't get any ideas - I don't want any last minute bidding. If you do, there will be be hell to pay, courtesy of me.

According to the auction listing, the car was formerly owned by the National Bank of Ukraine, of which Viktor Yushchenko was the head until 1999. This car was reportedly his personal business automobile.

In all sincerity, is this even for real? $1 million has to be a typo. I think the only way anyone could ever pull off $1 million for a 1980 S350 is if it was owned by Jesus Himself. Wait a minute, that's not a bad idea...

UPDATE: Someone just bid and bought Yushchenko's Mercedes for $1,000,000.

Source: eMercedesBenz

Bookmark and Share

Exiled Russian Tycoon Planned Car-Bomb Attack During Ukraine’s Orange Revolution

MOSCOW, Russia -- Former Ukrainian Security Service (SBU) officer Valentin Kryzhanovsky, who was attacked by hitmen after he accused his boss Igor Drizhchanny of corruption, blackmail and smuggling, and had to flee from the country, has given a sensational interview about recent events in Ukraine to the Russian daily Izvestia.

Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko

According to Kryzhanovsky, the exiled Russian oligarch Boris Berezovsky, who reportedly sponsored Viktor Yushchenko’s campaign, was preparing a car blast during the Orange Revolution, but it was prevented by Russian security forces.

Kryzhanovsky also claimed that the president was not poisoned by his opponents to prevent him from taking part in the presidential elections. He says the president simply drank alcohol by mistake after stem cell therapy. The colonel also said that the investigation of a controversial murder case of a journalist was being used by many Ukrainian politicians to pursue their own aims and had been falsified.

Kryzhanovsky said the car bomb was stopped near Yushchenko’s headquarters last fall during the election campaign. He claims it was supposed to show that political adversaries were trying to get rid of Yushchenko and that it probably would have gone off if Russian security officers had not noticed that Russian license plates were to be used on the vehicle. The link to Russia was needed to show that supporters of the second candidate Viktor Yanukovich, backed by Moscow, were trying to assassinate Yushchenko.

The story of the poisoning that brought Yushchenko the sympathy of many of the country’s citizens was also a lie, the colonel claims.

“Igor Smeshko and Vladimir Satsuk (former chief and deputy chief of the SBU, accused of poisoning Yushchenko during a dinner) did not add poison to his meals,” Kryzhanovsky said. “Smeshko and Yushchenko have been friends for ages. Satsuk used to work at the Ukraine bank that the president headed till 1993.”

The colonel claims they were used to explain what had happened to Yushchenko after he had undergone stem cell therapy to look younger and drank alcohol by mistake causing an allergic reaction.

The third denunciation Kryzhanovsky made concerned the murder case of opposition journalist Georgy Gongadze that has remained unsolved since 2000. He claims that according to witnesses’ testimonies, the reporter’s headless body was burned soon after the killing.

Viktor Yushchenko proclaimed the solving of the Gongadze case a priority during the revolution, and shortly after he took office the body of the journalist was found. Even Gongadze’s own mother refuses to bury it, Kryzhanovsky stresses.

Valentin Kryzhanovsky, 42, used to work in Russia’s Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff, but in 2004 was invited to join Ukraine’s SBU directorate for fighting corruption and organized crime.

Source: MosNews

Bookmark and Share

Poll: 58% of Ukrainians Say Orange Revolution Promises Unfulfilled

KIEV, Ukraine -- More than half of Ukrainians believe that President Viktor Yushchenko and his government have failed to live up to the promises of the Orange Revolution, according to a poll released Thursday.

Viktor Yushchenko at swearing-in ceremony in January

In the nationwide survey of 1,993 people by Kiev's Razumkov center, 37.5 percent of respondents said Yushchenko's team had fulfilled no promises at all, and 20.6 percent said the government acted contrary to its slogans from the Orange Revolution.

Tuesday marks the first anniversary of the mass protests over election fraud that came to be known as the Orange Revolution and helped usher Yushchenko into power.

During the protests, Yushchenko and his team pledged to combat corruption, restore trust in the government, improve living standards and win European Union membership for this nation of 47 million.

But his popularity has been dented by stalled reforms, a corruption scandal involving some of his closest aides, infighting in his administration and a slowing economy. The country has yet to receive any real movement on its EU membership.

The poll taken between Nov. 3-13 had a margin of error of plus or minus 2.3 percentage points.

Of those polled, only 14.3 percent said they support Yushchenko, down from 46.7 percent in February, a month after Yushchenko became Ukraine's third president since 1991 independence. Nearly 60 percent of Ukrainians believe the country is on a wrong path, while 18.3 said it was on the right path, the poll found.

The survey also showed how weak Yushchenko's position is ahead of crucial parliamentary elections in March. The poll found that Ukrainians would be more likely to vote for the parties headed by losing presidential candidate Viktor Yanukovych than Yushchenko's team if parliamentary elections were held this week, reports AP.

Source: Pravda

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, November 17, 2005

Ukraine: Government Faces Uphill Battle In Achieving NATO Aspirations

PRAGUE, Czech Republic -- Czech Defense Minister Karel Kuehnl said during a joint news conference with Hrytsenko in Prague today that the Czech Republic wants NATO next year to prepare a "realistic" plan for Ukraine's NATO accession.

Ukrainian Defense Minister Anatoliy Hrytsenko

The Czech defense minister said his country can help Ukraine resolve some of the problems it is encountering on its path toward NATO integration.

"There are three spheres where the Czech Republic can share its experience in the transformation of its armed forces," Kuehnl said. "This is primarily the so-called personnel management; that is, a wide sphere ranging from education to social issues. Furthermore, it is financial-resource management. Finally, we have a common problem of disposing of unnecessary ammunition."

But Ukraine faces a number of hurdles to its NATO accession that Czech expertise might not help overcome.

For example, carrying out the military downsizing required to join NATO by 2008 threatens to strain Ukraine's budget. This is because such massive cuts could mean that the state will have to pay to retrain and find jobs for discharged servicemen.

Ukraine is currently undergoing reforms that will reduce its 280,000-strong military to some 140,000 troops by 2012. It is also restructuring its combat capabilities to comply with NATO standards.

As part of this reform effort, Ukraine last year cut 70,000 military personnel. The military is to be reduced by a further 40,000 servicemen this year, and by 18,000 annually in the coming years.

Some Ukrainian politicians and economists are also worried that Ukrainian NATO accession could ruin or significantly damage the country's military-industrial complex. They argue that the country's defense industries will become obsolete after the military switches to weapons and military technologies used by NATO troops.

Such an outcome could result in the loss of tens of thousands of jobs in Ukraine and, possibly, a disruption of cooperation ties with Russia's military industries.

But the main obstacle to Ukraine's NATO membership seems to be presented by ordinary Ukrainians. Most still retain the Soviet-era perception that the alliance is a hostile organization, or are unconvinced about the advantages of NATO membership.

According to a poll conducted among 11,000 respondents in May, more than half of all Ukrainians oppose the country's NATO entry, while fewer than one in four support the move.

Hrytsenko said in an interview with RFE/RL that a government trusted by the people can change this perception of NATO among Ukrainians.
Ukraine is currently undergoing reforms that will reduce its 280,000-strong military to some 140,000 troops by 2012.
"First, it is a problem of informing people about what NATO is and what it is not. The government has not yet done this. It can seriously tackle this issue only after the conclusion of the [2006 parliamentary] election campaign, which is not a favorable background for this," Hrytsenko said. "Second, it is a problem of public trust in the government. If the government resolves successfully economic, social, and all other problems, then citizens trust this government and support its foreign-policy course."

Ukraine has more than a decade of experience in dealing with NATO.

In 1994, it became the first post-Soviet country to join the Partnership for Peace. The partnership was a program of security and defense cooperation that NATO offered to nonmembers after the breakup of the Soviet Union and the Soviet-led Warsaw Pact.

In 1997, NATO offered Ukraine a "Distinctive Partnership" status that underlined the country's important role in maintaining European stability. A NATO-Ukraine Commission was established to coordinate further development of bilateral relations.

In May 2002, then-President Leonid Kuchma announced Ukraine's goal of achieving NATO membership.

In November 2002, NATO foreign ministers adopted a NATO-Ukraine Action Plan. The plan aims to expand bilateral relations and to support Ukraine's reform efforts toward integration with Euro-Atlantic security structures.

NATO-Ukraine contacts have increased following Viktor Yushchenko's victory in the 2004 presidential election.

President Yushchenko earlier this year visited NATO headquarters in Brussels. There he confirmed that he considers a course toward NATO a strategic political goal, and he urged the alliance to take relations with his country to a "qualitatively new level."

Shortly afterward, NATO and Ukraine launched an "Intensified Dialogue" phase in their relations, which is expected to lead to the opening of direct talks on Ukrainian NATO membership.

However, NATO officials persistently emphasize that the speed of Ukraine's integration will be closely related to the country's pace of implementing political, economic, and military reforms.

In May, President Yushchenko told Ukrainians that he will seek a referendum on the country's NATO and EU membership. Thus, considering the lack of support for NATO accession among the population, the Ukrainian government is facing an uphill task in persuading them that NATO membership is truly beneficial.

Source: Radio Free Europe

Bookmark and Share

Foreign Minister: Russia Violating Black Sea Fleet Agreement

KIEV, Ukraine -- Ukrainian Foreign Minister Borys Tarasyuk lashed out at Russia on Nov. 14, accusing it of violating an agreement that allows Moscow to base its Black Sea Fleet in a Ukrainian port.

Foreign Minister Borys Tarasyuk

The two nations divided up the Soviet Black Sea fleet after years of arguments following the 1991 Soviet collapse and Russia was allowed to base its fleet at Sevastopol until 2017. But they squabble periodically, with Ukraine frequently complaining that Russia is not upholding its side of the 1997 agreement.

In comments to the Kievskiye Vedomosti newspaper, Tarasyuk accused Russia of illegally appropriating extra land in the port, posting signs that read "Territory of Russian Federation" and closing off whole streets.

"This can't but worry us," Tarasyuk was quoted as saying.

He told the newspaper that Russia illegally occupied nearly 150 hectares (365 acres) of land around Sevastopol that are not covered by the 1997 agreement, and is renting out other land in violation of the deal.

"They are receiving commercial profits from these spaces, would should have been used for another purpose - in the interests of the Black Sea Fleet," Tarasyuk was quoted as saying.

There was no immediate response to the accusations from Russian officials.

He also complained that Russian flags fly from parts of Sevastopol and Russian patrols march with weapons through the streets.

Russia and Ukraine frequently trade verbal barbs over a range of issues, from gas transit to their shared border in the Black and Azov Seas.

Source: AP

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, November 16, 2005

Ukraine's Yushchenko In Paris To Strengthen Ties With EU

PARIS, France -- Ukraine's President Viktor Yushchenko met French business leaders Wednesday before talks with his French counterpart, Jacques Chirac, aimed at strengthening ties with the European Union and attracting investment into the ex-Soviet republic.

French President Jacques Chirac (R) welcomes his Ukrainian counterpart Viktor Yushchenko to the Elysee Palace in Paris

During a two-day visit that started Tuesday, Yushchenko was to meet with Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin and hold a series of consultations with French energy companies.

The visit was Yushchenko's second since winning last year's bitter presidential election.

Yushchenko has made joining the European Union and NATO long-term goals for his nation of 47 million, which for centuries has fallen largely under Moscow's sway.

"The cornerstone of our policy is to join the European Union," Yushchenko said in a speech Tuesday at the French Institute of International Relations, or IFRI. He said the government was committed to the "enormous work" required to make the country eligible for E.U. candidacy.

The Ukrainian leader is also pushing for membership in the World Trade Organization by the end of the year. Last week, French Foreign Minister Philip Douste-Blazy pledged his country's support for Ukraine's bid during a visit to Kiev.

While in France, Yushchenko was expected to participate in 60th anniversary celebrations for UNESCO, the U.N. cultural agency.

Source: AP

Bookmark and Share

Ukraine's Gov't Looks to Cover Deficits

KIEV, Ukraine -- Ukraine's government on Wednesday proposed spending 70 percent of the massive windfall earnings from the privatization of the country's flagship steel plant to cover growing budget deficits.


Finance Minister Viktor Pinzenyk

The Kryvorizhstal mill was acquired last month by the world's largest steel producer, Mittal Steel, for 24.2 billion hryvna (US$4.8 billion; euro4.02 billion), far exceeding analysts' predictions. The sale was the single largest foreign investment ever for Ukraine - equivalent to about 20 percent of this year's anticipated revenues.

Finance Minister Viktor Pinzenyk said the government wanted to spend nearly three-quarters of the windfall to cover budget deficits, which come to 7.9 billion hryvna (US$1.6 billion; euro1.3 billion) in 2005 and rise to 11.4 billion hryvna (US$2.3 billion; euro1.9 billion) next year.

Pinzenyk said the government would use the rest of the windfall to create a special stabilization fund.

He repeated assurances that the government planned to return 4.3 billion hryvna (US$860,000; euro720,000) to the consortium that bought the mill last year in an auction widely considered rigged. After becoming president in January, Viktor Yushchenko annulled the sale to the son-in-law of President Leonid Kuchma and another tycoon.

Source: AP

Bookmark and Share

German Investors Doubtful of Reforms in Ukraine

BONN, Germany -- When thousands took to the streets in Ukraine a year ago, one of the things they wanted in addition to fair elections was a better economy. But a year on, many people -- foreign investors included -- are disappointed.

How bright is the future for the children of Ukraine's "orange Revolution"?

At a factory in Stryj, eastern Ukraine, workers finish cable looms for the northern German special cable manufacturer Leoni, which supplies German firms such as Opel and Porsche. Employees say the work is "okay" -- they receive their wages regularly, even if, at the equivalent of 120 euros ($140) a month, they are quite low.

But it's these excessively low wages that make Ukraine an attractive destination for foreign investors. In countries such as Poland or Hungary, the wages are double or triple the amount.

The machines at Leoni are operating in full gear, even if the initial euphoria surrounding the "Orange Revolution" that promised an end to Ukraine's shadow economy has dampened.

"From our point of view, the situation now is really frustrating," said Leoni's Ukrainian director, Werner Geillinger. "The Ukrainian government cancelled all duty-free zones, because they wanted to cut off the schemes of the oligarchs, but by doing so, they've punished investors."

Extended workbench

Auto suppliers use Ukraine like an extended workbench -- importing all the materials, having cheap labor do the work on them, and then exporting the finished products to western European carmakers. In the past, agreements were made with the Ukrainian government to guarantee exemptions from sales tax and duty. After the new government canceled such agreements, Leoni was faced with an additional 300,000 euros a month in duty fees.

The abolition of special economic zones -- which were one of the main causes of corruption inside Ukraine -- has also added to the burden borne by many employers. And the discussion about the privatization of former state-owned companies has led to large-scale uncertainty.

"After the Orange Revolution, there was a lot of demand from German industry from both suppliers to industry as well as by direct investors," said Karin Rau, who works as a German industry representative in Ukraine. "But since April of this year, there's been a stop to that, due to the passing of several laws that didn't bring about the needed trust, because companies were neither involved nor informed of the changes."

In addition, Rau said that the dismissal of 18,000 bureaucrats from civil service meant that the new Ukrainian government lost a great deal of know-how. These days, a common complaint is incompetence.

Poor management

Leoni director Geillinger also accuses the new government of bad management, either because of inactivity or resistance to advice from outsiders.

But that's starting to change, according to Lars Handrich, a consultant from the German Economic Institute in Ukraine who advises the government on economic issues.

Overall, he says, Ukraine is better off now than it was a year ago, largely due to the new open atmosphere in Ukrainian society and more intensive contact to western Europe.

"It's not all downhill," Handrich said. "The tone of the discussions here recently has been rather pessimistic in my view. If you look at the economic statistics, you see that in the past year Ukraine's gross domestic product gained 12 percent. This year, economic growth will only fall by 2 to 3 percent. It's not a recession, it's just a decrease in the growth rate."

Handrich said the decrease can partly be explained by one-off effects in the last year of rule under former President Leonid Kuchma, when the state invested in the construction of two nuclear reactors and a motorway leading from Kiev to Odessa.

More liberalization needed

The country's increased inflation rate, he said, is due to increased demand created by higher salaries -- demand that couldn't be met by industry. For that reason, there were shortages of meat and other groceries. Ukrainian lobbyists blocked imports, which led to higher prices, Handrich said.

These developments are proof that the market has to be liberalized even more, and that the government has to continue with its reforms, particularly in the areas of agriculture and health care, but also when it comes to battling corruption.

One of President Viktor Yushchenko's most important goals, however, could soon be achieved -- the granting of market economy status for Ukraine's economy from the European Commission.

Things also appear to be moving forward in the auto-supply sector. Discussions with the government about the issue of duties are ongoing and are due to finish at the end of December. For Geillinger, that's reason to be hopeful. Ukraine is an attractive country, he says, but it's wasted a whole year.

"As soon as the Ukrainian government finds a solution, many others will come here," Geillinger said. "We're already contemplating expanding our factory. In the meantime, we're planning to build a second factory in Ukraine."

Source: Deutsche Welle

Bookmark and Share

Brawl in Ukrainian Parliament Interrupts WTO Vote

KIEV, Ukraine -- A brawl erupted among Ukrainian lawmakers in parliament Tuesday, interrupting voting on a series of bills needed for entry to the World Trade Organization.

Communists brawl in Ukrainian parliament

One of eight bills was passed, but lawmakers put off consideration of the remaining seven following the brawl. The bill passed envisages changes to sanitary rules for foodstuffs, including the threat of penalties.

Communists and pro-government lawmakers shoved each other and fought as Economics Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk struggled to speak in support of WTO membership. Communists also sounded loud, wailing sirens to drown out the debate before the 450-member parliament broke for recess.

President Viktor Yushchenko has made WTO membership an important goal for the country, which needs foreign investment to boost its sluggish economy.

But parliament has so far adopted only half of the required 14-bill package, due to opposition from Communists who fear membership will hurt Ukrainian farmers and industry.

Yatsenyuk said that failure to adopt the bills "will not hurt the WTO...it will hurt Ukraine", but he expressed hope that the government and lawmakers will settle the most disputed issues, including banking regulations.

Some experts say Ukraine is in a rush to join because of fears that Russia will win WTO membership earlier and then impose new conditions on Ukraine, delaying Kiev's admission.

Source: AP

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, November 15, 2005

Communist Party Vows to Derail WTO Bills

KIEV, Ukraine -- The Communist Party will scramble to prevent debate of bills crucial for Ukraine’s accession to the World Trade Organization by the end of the year, a party member said Monday.

The party, which controls a powerful group in Parliament, has already managed to postpone some bills in July by breaking audio equipment and making it impossible to debate the bills.

“The group is ready for the most radical measures,” Adam Martyniuk, deputy speaker of Parliament and a member of the Communist Party, said Monday. “I assure you we will not join any WTO by the end of the year.”

The comment challenges a key policy initiative of President Viktor Yushchenko of joining the WTO in December, a crucial step needed for a free trade accord with the European Union.

Joining the WTO is expected to help boost by 50% foreign investments and increase exports by 10% each year, helping Ukraine to boost economic growth by extra 1.9% annually.

Yushchenko urged Parliament to debate and to approve a dozen of WTO bills this week, according to Parliament Speaker Volodymyr Lytvyn. Some of the bills will be debated as soon as Tuesday, Lytvyn said.

Yushchenko, who doesn’t control a majority in Parliament, relies heavily on opposition groups, such as the Regions Party, led by former Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych, to approve the WTO bills.

Meanwhile, there were some signs that the Regions Party may not be ready to back the bills Tuesday as an important meeting with Yushchenko, originally scheduled on Nov. 10, had been postponed.

The meeting of the Political Council, which includes the president, his top aides and Parliamentary group leaders, is seen as a key tool for pushing the WTO bills through Parliament.

The council was created on Oct. 22, but its first meeting on Oct. 31 had led to a successful vote over two WTO bills Nov. 1, with the Regions Party backing the bills jointly with pro-government groups.

The Regions Party has been bargaining with the president seeking an end to investigations against party loyalists accused of involvement in fraud during presidential election last year and other alleged crimes.

Source: Ukrainian Journal

Bookmark and Share

Interior Minister Says Russia Has Not Extradited Wanted Ex-Officials

KIEV, Ukraine -- Interior Minister Yuriy Lutsenko said Russian authorities have refused to detain and extradite former officials wanted on international arrest warrants, the news agency UNIAN reported.

"The Russian Federation openly declines to carry out the extradition of persons who have Interpol red cards (warrants)," said Lutsenko.

Many Ukrainian former officials suspected of committing crimes under the 10-year rule of former President Leonid Kuchma are believed to have sought refuge in Russia to avoid arrest. Since taking office this year, President Viktor Yushchenko has pledged to root out the corruption, nepotism and links with organized crime that were rampant under Kuchma.

In June Ihor Bakay, wanted in connection with the loss of state funds, was detained in Moscow, then freed. Lutsenko at the time demanded an explanation, but received no answer from Russia. Under Kuchma, Bakay headed a powerful department responsible for state property.

Ex-Interior Minister Mykola Bylokon and former Odessa mayor Ruslan Bodelan, wanted by Ukrainian investigators, are also believed to have moved to Russia.

Source: AP

Bookmark and Share

Monday, November 14, 2005

Ukraine's Unfinished Revolution

WASHINGTON, DC -- Five years ago in Slate, Anne Applebaum told a "Ukrainian Murder Mystery" about the September 2000 killing of Gyorgi Gongadze, an Internet journalist almost certainly liquidated for publishing articles critical of then-President Leonid Kuchma. Gongadze's decapitated body was eventually found; his head was not.

Slain Internet journalist Gyorgi Gongadze

As anyone donning an orange scarf on Kiev's Independence Square during last year's uprising could tell you, the Gongadze case has never simply been a crime. It has always been, from the moment the journalist was kidnapped and, soon after, beaten to death, a symbol of larger things.

Above all, it was a symbol of a past—an ideology, a consciousness, a national enslavement—that most Ukrainians wanted to move beyond. The Gongadze murder, and the state's refusal to investigate it, encapsulated a whole history, beginning with mass death in the name of Bolshevik utopia and ending, ignominiously, with mobster rule in the name of nothing.

So, when Viktor Yushchenko was catapulted to power last December, there was widespread expectation that the government would finally solve the crime. After all, ex-President Kuchma appeared to have been implicated in the murder by audiotapes provided by a former guard.

Alas, it's been 10 months since Yushchenko took power, and, so far, little progress has been made: The alleged murderers have been arrested, but the men behind those men have yet to be identified.

The activists and reformers, the people who once worked the phone banks and organized protests for pro-democracy outfits like Znayu (I Know) and Pora (Enough), are deeply disappointed. It seems the people have changed, but the authorities have not.

Before the government can forge a new compact with the governed, it must acknowledge the past, the reformers contend. There must be a cleansing ritual or process—the Germans' opening of Stasi files; the Czechs' "lustration," which barred senior Communist officials from positions of authority; or the South Africans' Truth and Reconciliation Commission—separating the old from the new. That has yet to happen in Ukraine.

Ukrainian officials, including the new prime minister, Yuriy Yekhanurov, who was in Washington recently meeting with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and congressional leaders, insist they are determined to get to the bottom of the Gongadze murder.

But Gongadze's widow, Miroslava Gongadze, says that's a lie. It seems to her that President Yushchenko doesn't really want the crime solved, because doing so would bring down senior officials in his own government and jeopardize his party's standing in next spring's parliamentary elections.

"He doesn't know what to do," Gongadze said of Yushchenko in a recent interview, sipping tea in the basement cafeteria of Voice of America, where she broadcasts daily reports from Washington to viewers across Ukraine. "He understands that if he doesn't investigate the case, he's done, he doesn't have a political future. But he understands that if he does, he's in trouble."

Gongadze doesn't believe the president is in any way responsible for her husband's murder. But his connection to Kuchma—he served as the former president's prime minister from late 1999 to early 2001—means a serious investigation could tar him by association. Certainly, other senior, pro-reform officials close to the Yushchenko administration—most notably, Gongadze says, Speaker of the Parliament Vladimir Lytvyn—could face trouble.

For months, government officials have tried to quell frustration surrounding the case by co-opting Miroslava Gongadze. Yushchenko personally urged Gongadze, who fled to the United States after her husband's murder, to come home. Boris Tarasuyk, Ukraine's foreign minister, offered her a job, she says. Clearly, they recognize Gongadze's political value: If the outraged widow moves home, she mustn't be outraged anymore. Justice is being served.

But Gongadze isn't leaving Washington. Besides giving Yushchenko an undeserved boost, it would endanger her 8-year-old daughters, Salome and Nana. (On a September trip to Ukraine, Gongadze was confronted by Prosecutor-General Svyatoslav Piskun, who, she says, "threatened" her to get her to drop the case. Piskun, a holdover from the Kuchma regime, was fired last month, after complaints that he'd impeded the Gongadze investigation.)

Prime Minister Yekhanurov, who replaced Yulia Timoshenko in September, says the president has simply been busy—too busy, even, to find a new prosecutor-general (or attorney general) nearly a year into his presidency.

Of course, if Gongadze is correct—if Yushchenko's prospects and those of the democratic forces in the Rada, or parliament, are jeopardized by the investigation—then perhaps it is best that the investigation be postponed. Perhaps a short-term injustice, which, in the end, involves only a single man and a single family, can serve the interest of a longer-term good, the establishment of a stable and westward-looking Ukraine, a country of nearly 50 million.

Or perhaps that Ukraine already exists. Yushchenko and his minions may be damaged by the inquiry into Gyorgi Gongadze's death. The president's Nashe Ukraina Party may lose parliamentary seats in March. But Ukraine is not the same country it was a year ago. A new political identity has emerged. As Gongadze puts it: "Ukraine will never be the same, because the people are different. The people realize they can stand for themselves."

Gyorgi Gongadze's murder may not be solved for 20 years, as his widow fears. Or it may be solved next month, unleashing a flood of denunciations, recriminations, and arrests. When the earthquakes are over, it may not matter. The democracy—however fragile or nascent—may be stronger than that. It may not depend anymore on one man but on the people's will to govern themselves.

Source: Slate

Bookmark and Share

Who Are Yushchenko's True Allies?

KIEV, Ukraine -- Despite Ukraine's September political crisis and the subsequent fall of the Yulia Tymoshenko government, the Tymoshenko bloc in parliament is still a fairly reliable ally of President Viktor Yushchenko's People's Union-Our Ukraine (NSNU). Other allies from the Orange Revolution, including the Socialist Party (SPU) and Party of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs (PPPU), may still be inside the government headed by Prime Minister Yuriy Yekhanurov, but they frequently vote against the NSNU on strategic issues.

"Orange Revolution" dream team - Yushchenko (L) and Tymoshenko

The Tymoshenko bloc and NSNU will contest the March 2006 elections separately, a strategy that, ironically, is likely to bring them more votes than if they enter the elections in one bloc. Two recent votes reflect the re-emergence of de facto Orange Revolutionary unity.

On November 2 the Ukrainian parliament refused to ratify a Memorandum of Understanding with NATO regarding NATO use of Ukrainian airlift capacity. The Memorandum had been ratified with centrist support in the Leonid Kuchma, era because it brings tangible economic benefits to Ukraine. This time the vote failed because the SPU and PPPU, supposedly Yushchenko's allies, failed to deliver 30 of their 39 votes.

The failure of the Socialists and Industrialists and Entrepreneurs to support ratification of the Memorandum is a clear indication that their loyalty to the strategic domestic and foreign policy objectives of the Yushchenko administration is low.

The weekly Zerkalo Tyzhnia/Nedeli complained that such a voting fiasco placed the Yushchenko administration in a poor light, as Kyiv could not follow through on its foreign policy commitments.

The Tymoshenko bloc also supported the NSNU over parliamentary opposition to the re-privatization of the Kryvorizhstal steel mill. Prior to the successful re-sale for $4.8 billion, parliament had twice voted to block the re-privatization. The Tymoshenko bloc, Reforms and Order, and NSNU opposed parliamentary votes for a moratorium on Kryvorizhstal's re-privatization, a vote supported by all 39 SPU and PPPU deputies. In a separate vote, both the SPU and the PPPU backed a resolution calling for Kryvorizhstal to remain in state hands.

Regarding both the NATO Memorandum and Kryvorizhstal, the greatest cynicism came from the once hardline supporters of Kuchma, Regions of Ukraine (RU) and the Social Democratic Party-United (SDPUo). Both parties supported the ratification of the NATO Memorandum under Kuchma and privatized Kryvorizhstal in 2004 to two oligarchs for one-sixth of the price obtained last month.

The Social-Democrats' call for a referendum on NATO accession has been ridiculed by the Ukrainian media. SDPUo leader Viktor Medvedchuk did not protest when NATO and EU membership were included in the new 2004 military doctrine. And as prime minister in 2002-2004, Regions of Ukraine head Viktor Yanukovych led a government that had declared its intention to seek NATO membership in May 2002.

These votes on two crucial issues show that the September crisis did not irrevocably split the Orange revolutionary camp. The best chance for a pro-reform parliamentary majority is if NSNU and the Tymoshenko bloc come together after the 2006 elections.

This view is strongly backed by two factors. First, public opinion has not been willing to accept the permanence of the split. Second, neither NSNU nor the Tymoshenko bloc will have sufficient votes to independently create a parliamentary majority.

Calls for re-unification of the Orange Revolutionary camp have increasingly been heard from both the NSNU and the Tymoshenko bloc. Tymoshenko has initiated meetings on this subject with state secretary Oleh Rybachuk, but she has put forward two conditions.

First, the business entourage that surrounded Yushchenko must not be included in the NSNU election line-up. This demand is easy to accommodate, as Rybachuk has already moved to block Petro Poroshenko, the most criticized of this business group, from easy access to President Yushchenko.

Second, Tymoshenko wants to be prime minister again. This demand is unlikely to be met and could prove a major stumbling block. Yushchenko would want to keep Yekhanurov in this position. Too many senior NSNU officials are uncomfortable with Tymoshenko, whose abrasive style is seen in a negative light by NSNU senior officials, such as parliamentary faction leader Mykola Martynenko.

Parliamentary speaker Volodymyr Lytvyn, another potential NSNU ally, has called for "professionals" in government, and "not those who can shout at meetings," a clear jab at Tymoshenko. Lytvyn has depicted his eponymous election bloc as one that stands for "compromise" and Ukrainian unity, not divisiveness, a jab at both Tymoshenko and Regions of Ukraine.

The head of the NSNU political council, Roman Bezsmertny, is as distrustful of Tymoshenko's populism and personal ambitions as is Martynenko and Lytvyn. Nevertheless, he has accepted the need for unity negotiations after the 2006 elections to create a parliamentary majority.

Constitutional reforms set to go into effect after January 2006 will transform Ukraine from a semi-presidential to a parliamentary-presidential system. This will be a major step towards democratization, as the presidential systems seen throughout the Commonwealth of Independent States have been plagued by authoritarianism and abuse of executive office.

At the same time, constitutional reforms will lengthen parliament's term from four to five years, prevent defections from factions, and force parties to compromise over creating a parliamentary majority that, together with the executive, chooses the government.

Of the six parties and blocs set to enter parliament, Yushchenko's NSNU can only create a parliamentary majority with one of the two other large forces: the Tymoshenko bloc and Regions of Ukraine. The cooperation and goodwill between the NSNU and the Tymoshenko bloc created in the runup to the election will facilitate a choice for Tymoshenko. In any case, they will celebrate the first anniversary of the Orange Revolution together on November 22.

Source: Eurasia Daily Monitor

Bookmark and Share

Clinton's Spin Doctors to Fix Yushchenko's Image

WASHINGTON, DC -- If you're the president of Ukraine and your fledgling administration is already embroiled in a political crisis, who you gonna call? Bill Clinton.

Bill Clinton (L) with Viktor Yushchenko (R)

According to Washington Whispers, U.S. New & World Report, only a year after the Orange Revolution catapulted him to power, Viktor Yushchenko is turning to Bubba's old team of spinmeisters and policy wonks.

Former press secretary Mike McCurry and ex-Chief of Staff John Podesta will head to Ukraine next week to meet with Yushchenko and dispense a little advice. "It's much ado about nothing," insists Jay Carson, Clinton's spokesman.

But to Yushchenko, who amid allegations of corruption has joined forces with his opponent, Viktor Yanukovich, it may be just what the spin doctor ordered.

Source: UNIAN

Bookmark and Share

The Long and Winding Road West

LONDON, England -- The great and the good of Europe are often spotted making a beeline for the tennis court-sized office occupied by Jose Manuel Barroso on the 13th floor of the European commission's Berlaymont headquarters in Brussels, but last week jaws must have dropped as one of the richest men in the former Soviet Union popped in.

Viktor Pinchuk

Viktor Pinchuk, a key figure behind the scenes during last year's Orange Revolution in Ukraine, came to plead his country's case for a seat at Europe's top table. The stocky millionaire businessman, who used to control Ukraine's largest steel mill, was a leading member of a delegation from the pan-European Yes group, which wants to set in motion eventual EU membership for the land once known as the breadbasket of the Soviet Union.

The sight of Mr Pinchuk in Brussels may come as a surprise to those in Ukraine who remember him as the son-in-law of Leonid Kuchma, the dour former president who tried to thwart democracy last year in an attempt to please Russia.

Mr Pinchuk's involvement in the purchase of the country's giant Kryvorizhstal steelworks for just under $800m (£458m) - a sixth of its value - on the eve of last year's election was seized on by the eventual winner, Viktor Yushchenko, as a symbol of the less-than-transparent ways of the old regime.

Life has since moved on as the country gears up for the first anniversary of the Orange Revolution, when a popular uprising swept the old, pro-Russian guard from office.

Last month the billionaire Mittal brothers paid $4.8bn for a 93% stake in the Kryvorizhstal mill as part of a deal that boosted Ukraine's coffers after the state won back control of the plant in a court case last June.

And now Mr Pinchuk is willing to upset the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, by trying to set in motion Ukrainian membership of the EU.

His Yalta European Strategy (Yes) group - named after the Black Sea resort where the iron curtain was formally laid in place after the second world war - is treading carefully out of respect for Russia and for EU countries wary of upsetting Moscow.

Stephen Byers, the former British cabinet minister who chairs Yes, says it would be wrong for Ukraine to rush headlong into EU membership even though the country has a strong case under the Treaty of Rome, which founded the union.

The treaty states that any European country is entitled to join. Ukraine's supporters like to point out that its 48 million citizens live in the country that takes up the largest slice of European soil.

However, Mr Byers said in remarks that show the group is not prepared to do President Yushchenko's bidding: "I have reservations about an application to join the EU now. We should look at a series of confidence-building measures so that Ukraine can be in a position to apply."

The first goal is to be awarded market economy status, which would allow Ukraine to join the World Trade Organisation by the spring of next year. Yes then wants Kiev to sign an association agreement with the EU in the hope of joining fully in 10 years' time.

Ukrainians living in the east, who feel a cultural affinity with Russia and who voted overwhelmingly for the Putin favourite, Viktor Yanukovich, will no doubt feel deeply uncomfortable at such a prospect, even if it is a decade away. But for many in Kiev and the rural western region, which voted just as overwhelmingly for President Yushchenko, a 10-year timetable represents an agonising wait as they watch their natural allies in Poland prosper in the EU.

Conscious of these differences, the Yes group hopes Ukraine will take a big step on December 1 when Mr Yushchenko and Tony Blair, in his role as EU president, meet for an EU/Ukraine summit. But it will not be plain sailing: Viktor Pinchuk, who is a member of the fractious Rada, Ukraine's parliament, says he will vote for membership of the WTO, but he expects a battle. "Ukraine would have to open markets for US poultry," he warns. "It may kill the Ukrainian poultry industry."

There will, however, be limits to the embrace of Europe, whatever Mr Yushchenko thinks. The president enjoys warm relations with Nato - George Bush lavished praise on him at a meeting at the alliance's Brussels headquarters earlier this year - but Mr Pinchuk believes membership would be a step too far. "Nato is not a popular organisation in Ukraine," he says. "They know it was our main enemy in the past."

Europe has its own problems. While former communist states such as Poland are agitating for Kiev to be allowed to join the club, the likes of Germany are wary of alienating President Putin.

The timing is also unhelpful, as the eastward expansion of the union slows down after French and Dutch voters rejected the EU constitution, in part because of fears about the arrival of new members. Only yesterday the enlargement commissioner, Olli Rehn, warned that the EU must not "overstretch" itself.

At the meeting, Mr Barroso warned Yes against setting Ukraine up as a rival to Turkey, whose bid to join the EU fuelled the French and Dutch no votes. The commission appeared to take a dim view of Yes's decision earlier this year to give heavy publicity to an opinion poll that showed stronger support for Ukraine than for Turkey. "Do not put yourself against Turkey," Mr Barroso is said to have told the meeting.

But Mr Barroso was friendly, not least because Mr Pinchuk played an important role in ensuring that the Orange Revolution did not turn violent. At the height of the crisis he is said to have told his father-in-law not to storm central Kiev, where the orange-clad demonstrators had gathered to show their support for Mr Yushchenko, the man whose face was permanently scarred in his battle for the presidency.

Source: Guardian Unlimited

Bookmark and Share

Unique Relief From Asthma Deep Underground in Ukraine

SOLOTVINO, Ukraine -- Driving by the village of Solotvino in western Ukraine, you'd never know that a unique healing haven for lung ailments lies deep beneath its dreary landscape of Soviet-era buildings and trash heaps.

Three hundred meters (985 feet) underground, hundreds of people with respiratory illnesses leave their ailments behind in the cavernous tunnels carved out of a working salt mine, the walls glistening with salt deposits.

"There are children who get one or two treatments and they forget about asthma," says Yaroslav Chonka, the chief doctor at Ukraine's allergological hospital in Ukraine's Transcarpathian region, on the border with Romania, which has been treating patients with this alternative method since 1976.

Vlad Rybakov, a 12-year-old from Ukraine's southern city of Odessa, is in the middle of his first treatment.

He came to get relief from an asthma that appeared out of nowhere two years ago and put a stop to his track-and-field days -- and already, he feels a difference.

"Before, I would get attacks and it felt like I was going to run out of air," he says, standing by an alcove carved from the side of a tunnel with beds for four patients. "But now I don't get them anymore. And I can run again! When I get back to Odessa, I'll start playing sports again with the other kids."

The method practiced at the hospital is called speleotherapy -- using the microclimates of underground places like mines or caves to treat lung ailments -- and has been in use in eastern Europe since the beginning of the last century, when the first such spa was opened in a salt mine in the Polish village of Velicko, near Krakow.

The practice grew out of observations in the mid 1800s by a Polish health official that salt miners did not suffer from respiratory ailments like tuberculosis.

Today salt sanitoriums are dotted throughout central and eastern Europe. Some use salt mines, others salt caves, while others offer rooms lined with salt crystals.

What makes the Ukrainian allergological hospital unique is the location of its underground facility -- at 300 meters below ground, it is the deepest facility of its kind in the world.

The air at that level, which feels heavy to a newcomer, is warm (a constant temperature of around 22 degrees Celsius -- 72 Fahrenheit), permeated with salt (15 miligrams per cubic meter -- 0.00053 ounces per 35 cubic feet), and nearly free of microbes and electromagnetic waves.

"We have a sterile environment equal to a surgery room," says Chonka. "Our treatment is by microclimate underground that's practically impossible to reproduce above ground."

A single treatment usually lasts 24 days, during which a patient will descend into the mine up to 18 times for anywhere from three hours to overnight. The rest of the time is spent at the above-ground facility.

While below, the adults usually read or lounge around on the beds stacked into alcoves carved out of the tunnels. The children run around until "quiet hour," when the fluorescent lamps lighting the tunnels are shut off and they lie in bed, laughing and chatting.

The results are striking.

"We can't say that we help everyone," Chonka says. "But the treatment is 90-95 percent effective for children, and 80-85 percent effective for adults."

Most patients begin to feel the effects after just a few descents into the mine.

"It's my third day," Sergei, a 45-year-old businessman from Moscow says, waiting to enter the elevator to take him down for his fourth mine visit. "After the first day, I didn't need to use my inhaler anymore."

Most children with non-serious forms of asthma usually undergo two or three treatment sessions, says Chonka, who has worked at the hospital since 1981 when he became deputy chief physician. For adults and more severe illnesses, the process can take longer.

"This is my sixth year," says Serhiy Savchuk, a 48-year-old from the central Ukrainian city of Kirovograd with chronic bronchitis. "After treatment, I feel much better, but it slowly deteriorates and lasts about a year before I have to come back."

The hospital treats more than 5,000 patients a year -- three quarters of them under the free government health care system, with the rest paying 22 dollars a day -- and has a waiting list months long.

"This place is a godsend," says Yelena Dietrich, a German national who heard about the facility from friends in western Ukraine and whose 10-year-old daughter is in the middle of her first treatment.

"Before, running was out of the question for her. Now she can run."

Source: AFP

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, November 13, 2005

Forgotten Children

TORONTO, Canada -- Olena Wresnewski-Cottrell had a tough start to life. Abandoned by her birth parents, she spent her first nine months alongside dozens of other babies and toddlers in an orphanage in the Ukrainian city of Lviv.

Most of the babies there were destined for a bleak existence moving from one overcrowded orphanage to the next. But luckily for Olena, that wasn't her fate; she was adopted and brought to Canada.

Now at age 13, she still remembers the babies that were left behind. "I think about how they don't have a really good life and I was fortunate to get one," says Olena.

It was November 1992 when Ruslana Wrzesnewski and her husband, Andy Cottrell, brought Olena home to Toronto. They were thrilled to have the baby as a new addition to their family, but their joy was tempered by the deplorable conditions they saw in the orphanages where children lacked clothes, toys and medicine.

"When we came back on the airplane, Ruslana turned to me and said 'This girl has just won the lottery'," remembers Andy. "We should do something for the other children. And without thinking of what this project would become, I said yes."

What the project became is Help Us Help the Children, a Canadian charity that raised hundreds of thousands of dollars in food, toys and clothes in its first two years. The project was an unqualified success, but Ruslana and Andy wanted to do even more for the more than 100,000 children in Ukraine's orphanages. So they started an annual summer camp in the tiny town of Vorokhta.

Summer camp for orphans

That was 10 years ago. The Help Us Help the Children summer camp has grown every year since. This year's budget of more than $350,000 is made up mostly of charitable donations from Canada. That money goes toward feeding, clothing, housing, teaching and entertaining 450 orphans from all across Ukraine.

The camp has a dizzying array of lessons and events, everything from computer training to a sewing class where the kids learn to make their own bed sheets and pillowcases.

"They're very needy in the orphanages," says Marianne Gross, one of two Canadian volunteers in charge of the sewing workshop. "They're sleeping on bare mattresses, so they're very excited about bringing home their own goods."

Not only will the children take home their own sheets, the sewing machines and computers will go back to the orphanages as well. And that's just the beginning of the bounty these kids receive. They also get brand new wardrobes, including jeans, jackets, shirts and shoes.

The kids also get a rare opportunity to see a doctor. Everyone receives a physical and the children with serious medical problems are sent to specialists.

Ihor Shafran has been coming to camp for 10 years. No child has benefited more from the charity's medical attention than him.

"Ihor was born with terrible deformities of his legs," says Ruslana. "When I first met him, he got around by walking on his hands, almost like a little monkey, unfortunately. And I remember being horrified that nothing had been done."

She quickly changed that, arranging for Ihor to have a series of operations that saw him outfitted with prosthetic legs.

"Then we made sure we kept track of him, wherever, which orphanage he landed up at and he's here at camp."

While Ruslana has been able to keep track of Ihor, it's impossible to follow the hundreds of orphans who come to camp each year.

"It's very difficult, because sometimes you don't know whether you'll ever see that child again," says Ruslana. "You wonder whether they'll make it or not."

When the orphans grow up

Tragically, many of these kids don't make it. Ruslana estimates that six out of 10 kids end up in prison or on the streets. When they turn 18, they are turned away from the orphanages, often with little training or resources to properly take care of themselves on the streets of Ukraine's cities.

Major Vasiley Sophos is the chief warden at a medium security prison in Ukraine that houses 1,600 male prisoners. He has worked in the penal system for more than 20 years. During that time, he has seen countless graduates of orphanages end up behind bars.

"When they finish at the orphanages, they are not fully prepared for life. They are without parents and they are also without government support," says Sophos.

Girls from orphanages often end up in prison too, but others fall prey to an even worse fate. They are trafficked into prostitution, forced to work the streets and brothels in cities across Europe including Amsterdam, Budapest, and Florence and along the notorious E-55 highway on the German-Czech border.

Hope for the future

But there is some cause for optimism. Ukrainian president Viktor Yuschenko is a long-time supporter of Ruslana's camp and has pledged to improve the lot of Ukraine's orphans. In a rare one-on-one interview, President Yuschenko spoke with W-FIVE about his government's plans.

"For many years, the state paid little attention to this problem and thanks to a program such as Help Us Help the Children, which Ruslana has run here, it created a great example for others," says Yuschenko. "I think that within two to three years we'll see a solution to this problem. In other words, after 18, this child should have an education, housing and a job."

Yuschenko concedes that these ambitious plans will take a few years to put in place and there are thousands of kids at risk right now. All Ruslana can do is try to make the kids at her camp aware of the dangers and hope that they make the right decisions.

Instead of preachy lectures, Ruslana has brought in a Ukrainian theatre troupe to do a series of performances about the dangers of drugs, violence and being trafficked into prostitution. The performers, all young people in their teens and early 20s, captivate the audience of orphans, giving Ruslana cause for hope that the message is sinking in.

"They have to know the truth. They have to know what's waiting for them," she says.

At the end of the two weeks of camp, it's time for the children to say goodbye and head back to the orphanages. It's a huge undertaking to get more than 400 children and all their belongings on board the train. The whole process takes nearly an hour, leaving plenty of time for hugs, kisses and last minute goodbyes. It's an emotional time for everyone, including Ruslana.

"On every corner, kids are exchanging addresses, they're crying, they're hugging each other. And then once they get on the train then it's very sad. There are a lot of tears and there's counselors holding kids who don't want to let go."

While saying goodbye is difficult, the children who were lucky enough to take part in the camp are grateful for the opportunity and they know whom to thank.

"When I look at Ruslana, I see a really good person," says one orphan-camper, 15-year-old Lila. "I love her smile. She has a wonderful smile. I think she's a wonderful person."

Source: CTV

Bookmark and Share

Tymoshenko, Seeking New Alliance, Calls for Talks with President's Party

KIEV, Ukraine -- Ousted Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko proposed Friday that her bloc reunite with the president's political party and run together in parliamentary elections next year.

Ousted PM Yulia Tymoshenko

"We need to restore our unity and win," said Tymoshenko, who was sacked in September by Yushchenko, who accused her of being unable to work together with his team.

The March vote is expected to become a major battle for Yushchenko and Tymoshenko, both of whom claim to be the sole guarantor of the ideals of the Orange Revolution mass demonstrations last year that helped propel Yushchenko to the presidency.

Tymoshenko has said she hopes to regain the prime minister's job after the March balloting, and opinion polls show her party poised to get more votes than Yushchenko's. But she still lacks the support to win an outright majority, and analysts say she is now hunting for a coalition partner.

Under political reforms, which come into force in January, the party that receives the most votes will form a parliamentary majority and nominate the prime minister.

After the September sacking, Tymoshenko said that she and Yushchenko would head to the elections on parallel paths. But she, nevertheless, has repeatedly offered to work with him.

Mykola Martynenko, deputy head of Yushchenko's party, said his party was ready for rapprochement, but countered that "Tymoshenko's parallel path is actually perpendicular to Yushchenko's."

Tymoshenko's offer comes amid moves by Yushchenko to work together with his rival from last year's election, Viktor Yanukovych. If the two were to form an alliance, it would freeze out Tymoshenko and her hopes of returning to the prime minister's job.

Analysts, however, suggest that it would be difficult for Yushchenko to justify a full-blown political alliance with Yanukovych.

Source: AP

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, November 12, 2005

Press Freedom Under Threat in Ukraine, Reporters Watchdog Group Says

KIEV, Ukraine -- The head of a reporters watchdog group warned on Nov. 11 that some Ukrainian media was coming under growing pressure, but was heckled by some journalists about his ties to a controversial tabloid editor.

Robert Menard

Robert Menard, head of the Paris-based Reporters Without Borders, said that although Ukraine had enjoyed broad press freedom after last year's Orange Revolution, the situation appeared to be deteriorating.

Menard cited a fire bomb attack in September on a car owned by his friend, celebrity tabloid editor Walid Harfouch, as one example. Harfouch claims the attack was linked to a photo expose on President Viktor Yushchenko's son planned by the tabloid, called Paparazzi. Critics of the businessman suggest it was a publicity stunt.

Yushchenko, who has said press freedoms are one of the big accomplishments of his tenure, has ordered a high-level investigation into the attack which came ahead of the tabloid's planned publication of photographs of Yushchenko's son, Andriy, and his girlfriend.

Harfouch and his brother, Omar, who is the publisher of Paparazzi, claimed to have been threatened earlier about the photos, and complained that Interior Minister Yuriy Lutsenko was refusing to investigate.

Yushchenko's son sparked a scandal this past summer when a Ukrainian Internet site reported on his allegedly lavish lifestyle, sparking an angry outburst from Yushchenko. The president later apologized.

Menard, who was accompanied by Walid and Omar Harfouch at the Nov. 11 news conference, also criticized the government for making no progress in identifying the organizer of the 2000 slaying of an Internet journalist, and criticized Yushchenko for refusing to meet with him.

Ukrainian journalists at Menard's news conference heckled him and the Harfouch brothers over their objectivity, prompting Menard to fire back saying they must speak out against pressure on the media "even if is directed at people you don't agree with."

The journalists questioned Menard over his links with the brothers, and complained that the brothers weren't providing names of who they claimed had threatened them. Journalists laughed loudly when the Harfouch brothers called for an independent parliamentary commission to investigate their complaints.

Source: AP

Bookmark and Share

Torah Stolen From Ukraine

ODESSA, Ukraine -- A Torah donated from a U.S. temple to a congregation in Ukraine has been stolen.


In April 2004, three members of Temple Emanu-El in San Jose, Calif., carried a historic Torah scroll from their congregation to Odessa, Ukraine, where they handed it over to that city's tiny, financially struggling Reform congregation in a festive ceremony.

Right before Rosh Hashanah this year, the Torah scroll disappeared, stolen right out of the ark in what is apparently being investigated as an inside job.

"The congregation is in shock," says Rabbi Alexander Dukhovny, head of the Reform movement in Ukraine. "You can imagine what Rosh Hashanah services were like."

Most Torah scrolls in the former Soviet Union are either donated from abroad, or newly written with funding from foreign supporters.

The World Union for Progressive Judaism has a twinning program to match up Reform congregations in the West with needy congregations in the former Soviet Union, Israel and elsewhere. Donating a Torah scroll is often part of the arrangement.

Julia Grishchenko, spiritual leader of the Odessa congregation, which is now also known as Emanu-El, discovered the theft on the eve of Rosh Hashanah when she opened the ark to prepare for services. She had seen it two days earlier during Shabbat services. Police found no evidence of a break-in, and suspicion quickly fell on a former congregant. Dukhovny says the president of the congregation called the woman and "gave her a chance to repent" for the 10 days between Rosh Hashana and Yom Kippur.

Instead, Dukhovny reports, the woman offered to return the Torah for $5,000. Police were listening in. They detained her for two weeks of questioning, but finally released her, apparently for lack of evidence.

Dukhovny says the Odessa police wanted to set up a sting operation to entrap the suspect, but she told the congregation's president the Torah was in Kiev, where Odessa police don't have jurisdiction. Dukhovny says the case seems to have come to a standstill.

"The police aren't telling us what's happening," he says.

San Jose marketing consultant Jonathan Hirshon spearheaded the original donation project, and was part of the group that took the Torah scroll to Odessa last year.

"We just found out about this, and we're in shock," he says. "To steal a Torah is bad enough, but to think it's a Jew who did it. We feel punched in the gut."

The Odessa congregation did not tell Temple Emanu-El about the theft until this weekend, to spare them distress during the Jewish holidays.

Emanu-El has sent photos of the Torah to the Odessa police to aid in their investigation. The Torah scroll was written in 1948 to commemorate the founding of Israel, and was restored by Emanu-El before it was taken to Ukraine as a gift to their twin congregation there.

Dukhovny says this is the first Torah scroll theft he's heard of since the fall of the Soviet Union 14 years ago.

Temple Emanu-El has produced a DVD about the Torah's journey to Odessa, and is now selling it for a minimum $25 donation to raise money for the Odessa congregation.

Dukhovny hopes that another U.S. congregation may step in and donate an extra Torah scroll to Odessa, perhaps during the upcoming biennial of the Union for Reform Judaism later this month in Houston.

Dukhovny recently went to Odessa and delivered a Shabbat sermon to the congregation.

"I told them that no one can steal a Torah," he says. "Even without a physical Torah, they can have Torah in their hearts. With the help of their sister congregation and world Jewry, they are not alone."

Source: Jewish Times

Bookmark and Share

Berezovsky 'Funded Revolution'

LONDON, England -- Boris Berezovsky, the UK-based Russian oligarch, has embarrassed the Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko by claiming to have heavily financed last year's orange revolution.


Russian oligarch Boris Berezovsky

Mr Berezovsky said he gave significant funds to Mr Yushchenko's closest associates and he is furious those aides are now denying they took his money. He has also said he wants to know how his money was spent and is threatening to sue the aides unless they make a personal apology and admit they took his cash. Ukrainian and Russian media claim he gave about $21 million (£12 million).

Mr Yushchenko's team fear an admission would spoil the public's perception of the event as a spontaneous display of people power. Mr Berezovsky's involvement would also confirm a belief that the revolution was aimed at damaging neighbouring Russia's interests. The oligarch is wanted in Russia on various white-collar charges (which he fiercely denies) and is regarded by the Kremlin as an enemy.

In Russian eyes, the revolution was a calculated blow to the nation's prestige. Mr Yushchenko defeated the pro-Russian presidential candidate Viktor Yanukovych after his supporters proved the rival camp had rigged the election and Moscow lost a great deal of influence.

Source: The Independent

Bookmark and Share

Swiss Offer Ukraine Bridge to Europe

LUGANO, Switzerland -- Ukraine's move towards democracy and membership of the European Union has been the focus of a one-day meeting in Lugano.

Access to clean drinking water is one of the SDC's priorities in Ukraine

At the Focus on Eastern Europe conference, Swiss Foreign Minister Micheline Calmy-Rey said Switzerland wants to smooth the way for Ukraine's entry into Europe.

Calmy-Rey said in this way Switzerland could contribute to the long-term stabilisation of eastern Europe.

She added that Switzerland could in particular help Ukraine adapt its legislative and economic framework to European norms – something she said the former Soviet republic would have to do.

She said Switzerland's experience showed that this wasn't easy, which was why Switzerland wanted to make the relevant know-how available.

A first step in this direction has already been taken. At the end of June Calmy-Rey paid an official visit to Ukraine and, at the request of Ukrainian President Viktor Yuschenko, made a Swiss consultant available to him.

"I am convinced our diplomats possess knowledge that will be of great value to Ukraine," Calmy-Rey said on Friday, adding that Switzerland had special expertise in the fields of decentralisation and fighting corruption.

The foreign minister said Switzerland and Ukraine should work together more "because neither of us is in the EU but we share European values".

She said both countries belonged to Europe based on their cultural identities and political circumstances.

Financial support

Walter Fust, head of the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), and Oscar Knapp, from the Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (Seco), emphasised how much Switzerland's work was appreciated by partner countries in the east.

Since the mid-1990s the SDC and Seco had supported projects for reform in Ukraine at a cost of SFr8-9 million ($6-6.8 million) a year.

Fust said the main areas of focus for the SDC were judicial reform, the sustained cultivation of natural resources such as drinking water, and the strengthening of public society.

Seco concentrated on promoting the private sector, primarily by supporting and financing small and medium-sized businesses, in addition to strengthening "corporate governance" in firms and the banking sector.

Source: SwissInfo

Bookmark and Share

Friday, November 11, 2005

Vimpelcom Enters Ukraine With $231 Million Takeover

MOSCOW, Russia -- Russia's No.2 mobile phone firm, Vimpelcom, entered Ukraine's fast-growing market by buying a company for $231.3 million despite opposition from Norway's Telenor, one of Vimpelcom's key shareholders.

Vimpelcom also said in a statement on Friday that Sweden's Ericsson (ERICb.ST: Quote, Profile, Research) had won a $200 million contract to supply equipment to the newly-bought firm, Ukrainian RadioSystems (URS).

Vimpelcom's top shareholders, Russia's Alfa Group with 32.9 percent of shares, and Telenor, with 26.6 percent, have for months been at odds over Vimpelcom's expansion in Ukraine.

Although a shareholder meeting approved the purchase of URS, Telenor opposed the deal, which has been under discussion since August 2004, at board meetings, saying the price was too high.

"As CEO, I could not have failed to fulfil a shareholders meeting's decision," Alexander Izosimov told a news conference. "There are no other such markets in Europe like Ukraine."

With a population of 47 million, Ukraine's mobile services penetration is 50 percent compared with 80 percent in Russia.

There are two major mobile services firms in Ukraine. Mobile TeleSystems, Vimpelcom's key rival in Russia, has been operating there for several years and has the biggest market share of any company. The second largest company is Telenor-controlled Kyivstar, where Alfa is a minority shareholder.

The board has never approved the deal with the required majority because Telenor's representatives voted against it.

Telenor said the purchase of URS, a company which controls less than 1 percent of the market, would require major investments and put Vimpelcom's own future at risk.

Telenor promised to consider taking legal action against the acquisition but added it would not sell its stake in Vimpelcom as it had once said it might.

"I hope that Telenor will never go ahead ... because that will be an affront to the will of other shareholders," Izosimov said.

Izosimov said Vimpelcom wanted to have at least 15 percent of the Ukrainian market within 18 months to two years.

He promised that the company would spend no more than $100 to $110 per subscriber in Ukraine, the same amount it spends in Russia.

But Morgan Stanley said it was less optimistic about the amount of spending needed to expand in Ukraine and the amount of time required to win a 15 percent market share.

"We believe the execution on the Ukrainian expansion will be challenging for Vimpelcom, given an already high penetration level and well-established competition," it said in a note.

"Potentially disruptive behaviour from Telenor on the ... board ... could hinder the implementation of the business plan. As a result, there is a possibility of a further escalation of conflict between Telenor and Alfa, leading to an increased risk premium for the stock".

However, Morgan Stanley left its 'underweight' rating on Vimpelcom and a target price of $39 unchanged.

Izosimov said that under the deal with Ericsson, the Swedish company would buy URS's old equipment provided by Chinese firm Huawei for $52.6 million in cash and supply its own equipment worth $200 million.

The URS deal follows an earlier $300 million deal between Vimpelcom and Ericsson in Russia.

Source: Reuters

Bookmark and Share

Klitschko to Champion Ukraine

KIEV, Ukraine -- This is a tough way to say goodbye, limping off into the sunset with your hat in your hands, your paycheck cancelled and your title belt draped over a chair for the next guy to come along and try on.

Vitali Klitschko

Some of us are going to miss having Vitali Klitschko to wonder about, to scratch our heads over. He was an intelligent, 6-foot-7 ambiguity waiting to be explained. Or revealed. You couldn’t tell if the guy was on the verge of greatness or just a hop, skip and a jump above mediocrity.

At times, the WBC champ seemed to be the best heavyweight the division had to offer, though these aren’t exactly the Ali-Frazier years. Still, he was one of four world champions, and that’s something he can carry with him as he hobbles into retirement with his bad knee, his sore thigh and his nagging back injury. He has more dings than the Chicago Bears.

Brutal sport this boxing, especially when you keep getting busted up before you even get into the ring to defend your title.

Klitschko had to pull out of a title defense against Hasim Rahman four times in less than a year. Their latest fight was set for Saturday night. But that was before Klitschko blew out a knee while training.

That’s not bad luck, it’s bad karma. Rahman must have thought he was stuck in a never-ending episode of the Twilight Zone, trapped in a revolving plot that has no beginning or ending.

Being as patient as a guy can be who has been jilted four times, Rahman said Klitschko wasted a year of his life, and at 32, the fighting years are a little more precious than they are at 22.

But this last injury, the right knee, well, pardon the pun, but that was the kicker, the heartbreaker, the last tango. Klitschko was told it would take six months to heal after surgery on Tuesday, and that’s just too long to wait.

He hasn’t fought since before last Christmas, so his title was about to be plucked from him anyway. Might as well quit before the vultures got the joy of snatching it away.

“Lately, I have been spending more time with my injuries then my opponent,” Klitschko said Wednesday in a release announcing his retirement. “The decision to retire from professional sports was a very difficult one, one of the hardest I have ever had to make. I love boxing and am proud to be the WBC and RING magazine heavyweight champion.

“But I would like to end my career at its peak, so I am retiring now as the champion to clear the way for my successors.”

Take all the potshots you want at Klitschko – question his heart and his skills – but there are no drug arrests in his past, no felony convictions and no bar fights at 2:00 in the morning outside a strip joint. He seldom took verbal cheap shots at anyone and he’s never been known to take a wild swing at a press conference.

The good news is, Klitschko won’t be hitting the soup line in Kiev when he gets back home to the Ukraine. Twenty years from now, they won’t find him passed out in an alley with an empty wine bottle clutched in his hand and a cardboard box hiding his clippings and trophies.

There aren’t a lot of guys holding doctorate degrees in the fight game, but Klitschko is one of them. And politics might be a calm alternative to holding the heavyweight championship of the world.

His country is undergoing some major changes and Klitschko probably feels the beckoning call of a government struggling to find itself.

Klitschko’s retirement doesn’t sound like a foolish decision made without a little thought. This is a guy who always presented himself with class and who believes in dignity and the nobility of his profession. In the end, it was just his body that betrayed him.

The fight game might have lost a champion, but I’m guessing the Ukraine has found one..

Source: The Sweet Science

Bookmark and Share

Ukraine Won't Appeal European Court Ruling on Gongadze Murder

KIEV, Ukraine -- Ukraine said Nov. 10 it will not challenge a European Court of Human Rights ruling that it must pay 100,000 euros ($120,000) to the widow of slain journalist Georgy Gongadze.

Justice Minister Serhiy Holovatiy

The court said on Nov. 8 that Ukrainian authorities failed to protect Gongadze and mishandled the politically charged investigation into his kidnapping and killing in September 2000. The headless body of the Internet journalist, who wrote about high-level corruption, was later found in a forest outside Kyiv.

The court awarded the money to Gongadze's widow, Myroslava.

"A person managed to achieve the truth ... and restore their rights," said Justice Minister Serhiy Holovatiy, who had served as lawyer for Gongadze's mother before being named to his current position last month. "The state and the Justice Ministry must be on that person's side."

After President Viktor Yushchenko's inauguration in January, prosecutors indicted three former policemen for Gongadze's death; a fourth suspect is at large and being sought on an international warrant.

Gongadze's family, however, has repeatedly complained that the government is no closer to finding who ordered the killing.

The slaying sparked massive protests against former President Leonid Kuchma, and secret recordings have emerged in which voices resembling Kuchma's and now-parliament Speaker Volodymyr Lytvyn other officials are heard allegedly complaining about Gongadze. Kuchma and Lytvyn have denied any involvement.

Source: AP

Bookmark and Share

Yushchenko Gives Blood Samples for New Poison Tests

KIEV, Ukraine -- Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko provided blood samples for new tests of the massive dioxin poisoning he suffered during last year's presidential campaign, his spokeswoman said Nov. 10.


Viktor Yushchenko before (L) and after (R) poisoning

Irina Gerashchenko said Yushchenko provided one sample on Nov. 9 and two more Nov. 10. The tests will be carried out in three foreign countries, said Gerashchenko, refusing to identify the countries until the tests are over.

Yushchenko fell ill last year during the presidential election, and after treatment in Austria was diagnosed as having suffered massive dioxin poisoning. He has called the poisoning an assassination attempt. It knocked him off the campaign trail for weeks, and left his face severely pockmarked.

No one has been charged in connection with the poisoning, although Yushchenko continues to maintain that those responsible will face justice and that the investigation is proceeding.

In September, former Security Service head Oleksandr Turchinov charged that Yushchenko's poisoning had not been proven because the president kept putting off tests in Ukraine.

Under Ukrainian law, tests must be conducted in Ukraine, or overseen by Ukrainian investigators to be considered valid, necessitating the new analyses. But local laboratories are incapable of conducting the examinations, so investigators asked foreign laboratories for help.

Source: AP

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, November 10, 2005

Don King to Sue Vitali Klitschko for Pulling out of WBC Title Fight

LOS ANGELES, USA -- Boxer Hasim Rahman and his promoter Don King are going to sue Ukraine’s heavyweight WBC champion Vitaly Klitschko who retired earlier this week. Rahman was due to fight Klitschko on Nov. 12, Boxingtalk reported.

Vitaly Klitschko (L) and Hasim Rahman (R)

An attorney for Rahman and King accused Klitschko of faking a knee injury and lying about surgery he said he has undergone.

Don King harshly attacked Klitschko in a statement: “The fact that Klitschko was operated on by an unknown surgeon at an unknown hospital gives us a ground to accuse him of falsifying his injury. All this is a cover up to let him escape meeting Rahman in the ring…Unfortunately we cannot acquire x-rays of his heart and blood. Then everyone would understand that he does not have even a trace of courage.”

Nevertheless, the World Boxing Council (WBC) and HBO Channel that was due to broadcast the fight said they support Klitschko and respect his decision. Moeover, a vote held by WBC may now make Rahman the champion.

Meanwhile, Ukrainian media report that Vitali, who backed President Viktor Yushchenko during last year’s Orange Revolution, may become mayor of the Ukrainian capital Kiev.

Source: MosNews

Bookmark and Share

Berezovsky Demands Account for Money Transferred to Ukraine

LONDON, England -- Exiled Russian tycoon Boris Berezovsky has demanded from Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko’s team to account for the money he transferred ahead of the presidential election in 2004, threatening prosecution by law otherwise, according to Itar Tas.

Tycoon Boris Berezovsky

“I transferred the money, and they have so far failed to give me an account as to how they spent it,” Berezovsky said in an interview with the Kiev newspaper Segodnya on Thursday.

He said he would refer the case to the British court as “the negotiations were held in Great Britain”.

One month ago, Berezovsky told a Ukrainian parliamentary commission that last year he had transferred 21 million dollars to support “civil society institutions” in Ukraine.

Berezovsky lives in Great Britain, where he was granted political asylum after fleeing Russia to avoid an investigation. The tycoon amassed a fortune in dubious privatization deals in the early 1990s.

Source: UNIAN

Bookmark and Share

Yushchenko Asks Opposition to Stop Blocking Work of Prime Minister

KIEV, Ukraine -- President Viktor Yushchenko pleaded with Ukraine's opposition on Nov. 9 to give the new prime minister a chance amid disputes over next year's budget and membership in the World Trade Organization.

President Yushchenko (L) and PM Yekhanurov (R)

He told a Cabinet meeting that Prime Minister Yuriy Yekhanurov "had no time to do anything bad ... and it's not good to cut his wings."

Yushchenko also called on opposition politicians to stop trying to block legislation needed for WTO membership and to adopt the proposed 2006 state budget.

He has made WTO membership by year's end a top goal, and has said that work has accelerated under Yekhanurov, who was named to the job in September after Yushchenko dismissed former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko.

Lawmakers have shown no inclination to pass quickly the six more bills needed to qualify for WTO membership. Last week, parliament passed the 2006 budget in the first reading, but only after heated debate.

Yushchenko said that parliament and the government share responsibility for this ex-Soviet republic's progress.

"We are in a one boat," he said.

Parliamentary speaker Volodymyr Lytvyn criticized the level of cooperation between parliament and the government.

"We need to think about our relations," he said. "As experience has shown, cooperation ended after the appointment of a new premier."

Source: AP

Bookmark and Share

Misplaced Affection

KIEV, Ukraine -- Ukraine’s new top law enforcement official announced Nov. 8 that he’s pleased with the team that’s been investigating the Gongadze murder. That’s a disgrace.

Oleksandr Medvedko (L) and President Viktor Yushchenko (R)

Journalist Georgy Gongadze, an enemy of the Kuchma crowd, was infamously murdered more than five years ago now – a full half-decade. Yet his killers are still walking free.

This, even though there exist actual secret recordings from Kuchma’s office on which Gongadze is discussed. This, even though witnesses to the crime have actually been detained and questioned and have passed along detailed information.

All that’s missing here is a Rodney King-style videotape. It seems to us the only reason the murderers haven’t been caught is because some powerful people don’t want the case solved. It’s an outrage.

Oleksandr Medvedko, the man President Viktor Yushchenko recently appointed Ukraine’s new prosecutor general, isn’t as annoyed about all this as we are. According to an article on the Ukrainska Pravda Web site, Medvedko on Nov. 8 said that there was no basis for changing the Gongadze investigation team, which in his opinion is working well.

He also said the Prosecutor General’s Office is doing everything it can to bring the Gongadze case to its conclusion.

He has a point, in a way. It doesn’t make sense to change the team that’s been on the case for years. But Medvedko’s satisfaction is unseemly. We earlier claimed in this space that Medvedko is the wrong man to be Ukraine’s top cop.

This confirms our view. It’s too late now, but responsible people in the government, starting with the president, should make clear that Medvedko’s setting the wrong tone.

Yushchenko’s behavior in all of this seems increasingly incoherent. Also according to Ukrainska Pravda, he this week instructed Medvedko to punish the people who falsified last year’s elections, and who led the short-lived separatist movement in Ukraine’s east.

He told the new prosecutor general to work in the anti-corruption spirit of the Orange Revolution. Earlier, he himself has complained that that Gongadze case isn’t getting solved fast enough.

But Yushchenko himself is the one who for a long time employed as prosecutor general the notorious Svyatoslav Pyskun, a Kuchma-era fixer under whose watch it was ridiculous to expect justice.

Medvedko, also, is a deeply compromised insider from whom it is difficult to expect good results. Yushchenko keeps employing people like this, and then wondering why nothing gets done. It’s strange.

Ideally, Yushchenko should dismiss Medvedko and appoint an uncompromised outsider to the Prosecutor General’s Office. More practically, he should slap Medvedko’s wrist and tell him that open approval of the miserable way the Gongadze non-investigation has been carried out isn’t allowed.

Source: Kyiv Post Editorial

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, November 09, 2005

Manager: Klitschko is 'Done for Good'

HAMBURG, Germany -- Heavyweight champion Vitali Klitschko stunned the boxing world Wednesday, announcing his retirement because of his recent knee injury.

Lewis (L) vs. Klitschko (R)

Klitschko, 34, suffered a right knee injury while sparring last Thursday, just nine days before he was to make a long overdue mandatory defense against former champion Hasim Rahman. However, the injury forced Klitschko to postpone the match for the fourth time this year because of various injuries.

The knee injury, however, proved to be more than he could overcome.

"Lately, I have been spending more time with my injuries than with my opponents inside the ring," Klitschko said in a statement.

"The decision to retire from professional sports was a very difficult one, one of the hardest I have ever had to make. I love boxing and am proud to be the WBC and Ring [magazine] heavyweight champion. But I would like to end my career at its peak so I am retiring now as the champion to clear the way for my successors."

Klitschko underwent knee surgery on Tuesday in Inglewood, Calif., manager Bernd Boente told ESPN.com from Germany.

"He is done for good. He retires," Boente said.

With the retirement, Rahman, who had been the WBC interim champion, will become the full titleholder joining IBF champion Chris Byrd, WBA titlist John Ruiz and WBO beltholder Lamon Brewster as claimants to the heavyweight championship.

Tired of waiting for Klitschko, Rahman had defeated Monte Barrett in August to win the interim belt. Now, he is a two-time titlist.

"Vitali retired so there is no question who the champion is," Rahman said from Las Vegas. "I did everything I was supposed to do. I waited through all the postponements. I won the interim title in a fight against Monte Barrett that people said I was crazy to take. Klitschko retired, and I won my title the same way he did after Lennox retired.

"I beat the No. 2 guy [Barrett]. I tried to get the man inside the ring but I couldn't. But I did everything a champion should do. I had an excellent training camp and I was in incredible shape."

Once the interim tag is officially dropped from Rahman's title, promoter Don King will control all four of the title holders. He said he wants to do a tournament to crown an undisputed champion.

On Friday, Klitschko was diagnosed with a torn meniscus and bone bruise after Dr. Bert Mandelbaum examined him and looked at an MRI.

Klitschko, a Ukraine native living in Los Angeles with his wife and children, got a second opinion from orthopedic surgeon Dr. Tony Daly in Los Angeles on Saturday. Daly fit Klitschko with a brace to see if it would stabilize the knee, but after sparring just one round, Klitschko said he was still uncomfortable, and the fight was postponed.

Klitschko intended to see knee specialist Dr. Richard Steadman in Vail, Colo., this week but instead saw another specialist, Dr. Neal Elattrache, in Los Angeles.

Elattrache not only repaired the medial meniscus during the surgery, but also a ruptured ACL, which had not previously been diagnosed.

"It was a very bad injury," Boente said. "It was absolutely impossible for him to fight. The knee was totally unstable, and now we know why. He had a torn ACL. That is what Dr. Elattrache confirmed. He fixed it and the meniscus."

Said Elattrache: "The surgery took 1½ hours and was a complete success, but Vitali cannot compete in professional sports for the next six months. With this severe an injury it would have been absolutely impossible for Vitali to participate in a fight in the near future. The knee was totally unstable and it would have not held up."

Boente said it was important to Klitschko to go out "at the peak of my career with the title."

Klitschko was facing a deadline from the WBC to defend the title or else he would be stripped. Although the organization had not determined the specific deadline yet — it was waiting for his medical report — it could have been as little as 60 days and probably not longer than 90 days.

"The doctor said it would have been horrible if he had fought," Boente said.

"I think that this shows a lot of character on Vitali's part. He tried a brace and said, 'no way.' It was impossible. He could have done it, got in the ring for a couple of rounds and taken his money. But that would be the worst thing. It would have been very bad for boxing. That would have been another black eye. That would have been a horrible scenario. But Vitali didn't want to cheat the fans.

"It shows how stupid all these accusers are who say that he is ducking Rahman. It is absurd. As an athlete, this is one of the worst injuries you can have."

Klitschko was due to earn a minimum of $7.8 million, but probably would have earned closer to $10 million. Rahman, who is in bankruptcy, will miss out on a much-needed $4.2 million payday.

"There are still plenty of valuable opportunities out there," Rahman said. "There is still a Klitschko fight that can be made. I can fight [Vitali's younger brother] Wladimir. Maybe he'll get in the ring with me. You got Brewster, Byrd, [James] Toney. There are several viable fights to make for me. I am in a position of strength. I wont have a problem securing paydays."

Klitschko said he would turn his focus to working on social projects in the Ukraine, where he has been politically active.

"In the future, I plan to get more heavily involved and devote more energy to tackling social and socio-political challenges in my native Ukraine," he said.

Said Boente: "He's a smart guy. He will do other things."

Klitschko also will continue to work with his younger brother, Wladimir Klitschko, a top heavyweight contender.

Klitschko (35-2, 34 KOs), with a chiseled 6-foot-8, 250-pound frame, was considered by many to be the best of the heavyweight champions, largely based on his highly competitive loss to then-champion Lennox Lewis on June 21, 2003.

Klitschko was ahead on the scorecards but lost on a TKO when the fight was stopped after six rounds because of a terrible gash over his eye.

The brave performance against Lewis restored Klitschko in the eyes of many who were down on him after he had quit with a shoulder injury after nine rounds in a fight he was winning against Byrd in 2000.

Klitschko couldn't get a rematch with Lewis because Lewis retired six months later. Instead, after knocking out Kirk Johnson in two rounds, Klitschko faced South African Corrie Sanders — who was coming off a knockout of Wladimir — on April 24, 2004.

Klitschko stopped Sanders in the eighth round and made one defense, stopping Danny Williams in the eighth round on Dec. 11, 2004. But then a string of injuries kept him from facing Rahman.

They were supposed to fight on April 30 in New York, but a thigh injury forced Klitschko to postpone the fight until June 18. When the thigh injury had not healed fully, he postponed the fight until July 23. That date was postponed again until Nov. 12 after Klitschko needed minor back surgery. Then came the knee injury.

Rahman said he was over his initial disappointment of the fight being called off and that he was happy to get the title for a second time, even if it came in less dramatic fashion than when he scored a massive upset knockout of Lewis in 2001.

"The disappointment was there right after Klitschko pulled out," Rahman said. "I would rather fight him in the ring, of course. I would rather win the title by knocking someone out. There is no feeling better than that. But I put 10 weeks of training in and had my opportunity snatched from me on a phone call. That was utterly disappointing. But today, I am happy."

Said Rahman manager Steve Nelson: "We're happy that Rock is now two-time heavyweight champion, and that there is closure to this issue with Klitschko."

Klitschko becomes the second heavyweight in a row to retire as champion, joining Lewis. There hadn't been a heavyweight champion to retire with the title since Rocky Marciano in 1956. Gene Tunney also did it in 1928.

Source: ESPN Sports

Bookmark and Share

Injury Forces Vitali Klitschko to Retire

HAMBURG, Germany - WBC heavyweight champion Vitali Klitschko has retired because of a knee injury, his former promoter said on its Web site Wednesday.

WBC heavyweight champion Vitali Klitschko

Klitschko pulled out of Saturday's title defense against Hasim Rahman when he tore ligaments while sparring last week in Los Angeles. He was fitted with a brace, but later canceled the fight with Rahman scheduled for Nov. 12 in Las Vegas.

"The decision to end with the sport was hard to make. But I would like to end my career on the top and with my retirement make the way free for my successor," Klitschko said in a statement released by Universum Promotions.

The injury will require six months to heal, but the WBC gave Klitschko three months to recover — after which it would award the title to Rahman.

The Ukraine-born fighter, who was 35-2 with 34 knockouts, underwent surgery on his knee Tuesday in Inglewood, Calif.

"Unfortunately, I've been fighting injuries recently more than facing rivals in the ring," Klitschko said.

Klitschko and Rahman were originally scheduled to fight April 30, but Klitschko pulled out because of a thigh injury.

But WBC president Jose Sulaiman said Monday that the most recent cancellation actually was the fourth time Klitschko backed out of a fight with Rahman.

Rahman grew so tired of waiting to fight Klitschko that he took a bout with Monte Barrett in August. Rahman won on a decision to become the WBC's interim champion, meaning he would be declared champion if Klitschko didn't fight him.

Klitschko has not fought since stopping Danny Williams in the first defense of his title last December.

Source: AP

Bookmark and Share

Payout Over Kiev Reporter's Death

KIEV, Ukraine -- The widow of a murdered Ukrainian journalist has been awarded 100,000 euros (£68,000) in damages by the European Court of Human Rights.

The headless body of the journalist, Georgiy Gongadze, was found in woods near Kiev in November 2000.

The court ruled that the Ukrainian authorities had not done enough to protect Gongadze's life, or to investigate his death.

It also concluded that police officers were probably involved in his murder.

Events revealing the possible involvement of state officials in Gongadze's disappearance and death were neglected or simply denied without proper investigation for a considerable period of time

"The court noted that recent developments in the applicant's case demonstrated with a high degree of probability that police officers were involved in the disappearance and murder of Mr Gongadze," the judgement said.

It also said his widow, Myroslava, had been subjected to degrading treatment by being deprived of information for years - including confirmation that the body was her husband's, and access to his file.

'Precedent'

It said her right to effective remedy had been violated, because "for more than four years, no effective criminal investigation could be considered to have been conducted".

Ms Gongadze told the BBC Ukrainian Service that for her, the most important thing was to have set a precedent for Ukrainian citizens.

"From today, anyone who wants to defend their rights can use this experience to struggle better for themselves," she said.

In their account of the case, the seven judges pointed out:

- The voice of the then Interior Minister Yuri Kravchenko is heard in recordings allegedly made in 2000 in the office of the then President, Leonid Kuchma, saying that he knows certain people capable of threatening Gongadze

- A newspaper in January 2001 made public the names of four police officers allegedly involved in the surveillance of Gongadze

- A lieutenant-general of the interior ministry was arrested on suspicion of involvement in Gongadze's disappearance in October 2003, only to be released two weeks later

- Three police officers were arrested shortly after President Viktor Yushchenko came to power, in early 2005

- Yuri Kravchenko's "death by purported suicide" was announced in March 2005 on the day prosecutors were due to question him

The judges ruled that events "revealing the possible involvement of state officials" in Gongadze's disappearance and death were "neglected or simply denied without proper investigation for a considerable period of time".

They added: "The fact that the alleged offenders, two of them active police officers, were identified and charged with the kidnap and murder of the journalist just a few days after the change in the country's leadership, raised serious doubts as to the genuine wish of the authorities under the previous government to investigate the case thoroughly."

However, prosecutors have been widely criticised for allegedly failing to make progress with the case since the arrest of the suspects in March.

In October, President Yushchenko sacked the prosecutor general, Svyatoslav Piskun.

On Tuesday, he accused Mr Piskun of working badly, and said he had failed to deliver results in the Gongadze case and other high-profile cases.

The men arrested in March have not yet been handed over to the courts for trial.

Source: BBC News

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, November 08, 2005

Ukraine: Leftists Commemorate Bolshevik Revolution With Antigovernment Rallies

KIEV, Ukraine -- An estimated crowd of 10,000 people took part in an antigovernment picket in front of the government's headquarters in Kyiv on 7 November. The picket, as well as a somewhat smaller rally on Independence Square shortly before it, was organized by the Communist Party of Ukraine to commemorate the 88th anniversary of the Bolshevik revolution in Russia.

Supporter of the Ukrainian Communist Party holds a portrait of Joseph Stalin, during a mass rally marking the 88th anniversary of the Bolshevik revolution on Independence square in Kiev, Ukraine

In 2000, the tradition of celebrating Revolution Day on 7 November ended when it ceased to be a state holiday in Ukraine, but Ukrainian communists and other leftists continue to mark the date with street demonstrations every year. Such rallies are usually attended by older people and pensioners; that is, by those Ukrainians who harbor nostalgia for the Soviet era and routinely vote for forces that pledge to reestablish the former Soviet superpower in one form or another, be it a hypothetical union of Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus or the proclaimed Single Economic Space that involves these three predominantly Slavic countries plus Kazakhstan.

This year, the attendance at October Revolution rallies in Ukraine was hardly better than in previous years. Apart from the 10,000-strong demonstration in Kyiv, there was only one more major rally in Mykolayiv in southern Ukraine, which attracted some 5,000 people. The attendance at 7 November demonstrations in other Ukrainian cities was reportedly quite low: Kirovohrad -- 1,000 people, Odesa -- 1,000, Simferopol -- 1,000, Dnipropetrovsk -- 600, Sumy -- 500, and Sevastopol -- 400.

This is a rather puzzling fact, for at least two reasons. First, Ukraine is on the eve of a major campaign for the March 2006 parliamentary elections. The Communist Party of Ukraine, which earlier this year formed the so-called Left-Wing Front as an election coalition for 2006, could seemingly use its rallies on the anniversary of the Bolshevik revolution as a test as well as propagandistic confirmation of its political readiness to enter the parliamentary campaign as a meaningful force. Judging by what actually took place this 7 November, the Communists continue to remain a minor political player in Ukraine.

Second, this 7 November Ukrainian left-wingers had a unique chance to hurl all of their repertoire of political and socioeconomic criticism at a single and clear-cut target -- President Viktor Yushchenko and his government. To them, Yushchenko embodies all the evils that have plagued Ukraine since its independence in 1991. To name just a few points of this repertoire -- Yushchenko is a pro-Western politician and wants Ukraine to be integrated with the West in the World Trade Organization, NATO, and the EU; Yushchenko is a nationalist and anti-Russian politician; Yushchenko is an oligarch and wants to sell Ukrainian national assets to either Western economic moguls or Ukrainian oligarchs of his own ilk. In short, President Yushchenko is a much better target for leftist criticism on 7 November than his predecessor, Leonid Kuchma, was in the past decade.

As should be expected, Communist Party leader Petro Symonenko listed all these points regarding Yushchenko in his speech on Independence Square in Kyiv, and they were voiced in different variations by local communist leaders in other Ukrainian cities. But the general impression of Ukrainian media and commentators was that this year's October Revolution commemorations were sluggish and uninspiring for adherents of the communist ideology in Ukraine, despite the fact that the country is now governed by combatants and followers of the "nationalistic" and "anti-Russian" Orange Revolution. This may be a signal that Ukraine's communists and leftists, in general, need a new political agenda or new leaders -- or both.

There also is no unity or solidarity among Ukrainian leftist forces regarding the celebrations of Revolution Day. The Socialist Party of Oleksandr Moroz was conspicuously absent from Kyiv streets on 7 November. The party has several ministers in the government, so it probably decided to stay away from what promised to be an antigovernment public event. And Communist Party followers prevented the Progressive Socialist Party of Natalya Vitrenko -- a no less fierce opponent of President Yushchenko than Symonenko -- from laying flowers at the only remaining monument to Vladimir Lenin in Kyiv. The Communists consider the Progressive Socialists to be sidekicks of the Donetsk oligarchic clan, whose political arm is the Party of Regions led by former Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych.

What was actually new during the 7 November rally and picket in Kyiv was the appearance of a relatively new group called the Eurasian Youth Union of Ukraine, which was represented by two dozen young Ukrainians. The organization is an apparent branch of the International Eurasian Movement, which is sponsored by some forces in Russia as a "Eurasian" response to what they see as the onslaught of Western "Atlanticism" on Russia and its post-Soviet neighbors, including Ukraine.

Members of the Eurasian Youth Union of Ukraine busied themselves in Kyiv on 7 November by throwing rotten oranges at government building, and police reportedly arrested nearly all of them in the process. It is difficult to say whether in the future this group will be able to pose a more serious treat to the Yushchenko government than 7 November. However, its emergence seems to be emblematic, and those trying to rebuild a "Eurasian" empire have not yet run short of initiatives, supporters, or money.

Source: Radio Free Europe

Bookmark and Share

Mass Death of Migrant Birds in Ukraine

MARIUPOL, Ukraine -- Mass deaths of migrant birds were registered in the Southeastern Ukrainian town of Mariupol on the Azov Sea, a newspaper in the capital city of Kiev reported Tuesday.

A port on the Sea of Azov

Mariupol's Chief Sanitary Inspector Heorhiy Husakov confirmed the mass deaths of migrant quails and gannets.

He said a local laboratory was testing the blood of dead birds. The Kiev Veterinary Academy is expected to make a final diagnosis and determine whether the birds were infected with bird flu.

All vessels and vehicles in the seaport of Mariupol are being disinfected, but local hunters may foil all the efforts by shooting wild fowl and grounding the disease.

The Azov Sea coast has turned into a huge bird colony where anyone can shoot a migrant duck or quail without aiming. Shooting is heard there all day long and no one can guarantee that hunters will not treat their relatives or friends to infected fowl.

The deaths come on the heels of mass fowl deaths from the deadly H5N1 strain of avian influenza that have swept Ukraine's eastern neighbor, Russia, and its neighbor to the south, Romania. The latest outbreak, which began in Asia, has already claimed human lives on that continent.

Source: RIA Novosti

Bookmark and Share

Defense Minister Visits Iraq to Discuss Withdrawal of Troops

BAGHDAD, Iraq -- Ukraine is considering leaving some weaponry behind in Iraq after the withdrawal of its troops from the country, the Ukrainian defense minister said Nov. 7 during a two-day visit to Iraq to discuss the pullout, according to the ministry in Kyiv.

Ukrainian soldiers from the military police patrol a road near Kut, 170km (106 miles) southeast of Baghdad November 8, 2005. Ukraine's top military official arrived in Iraq to supervise preparations for the withdrawal of its 800-strong peacekeeping contingent, scheduled to be completed by the end of the year.

Defense Minister Anatoliy Hrytsenko told Iraqi Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jafaari during a meeting that Ukraine might donate part of the peacekeepers' weaponry to the Iraqi military after the Ukrainians leave the country, a ministry statement said, adding that Grytsenko had not specified the type of weaponry that might be left.

Earlier, Hrytsenko had said Ukraine's 800 remaining troops in Iraq would be withdrawn by Dec. 30, following Iraqi elections scheduled for Dec. 15.

Ukraine began withdrawing troops in March, and President Viktor Yushchenko had long promised they would be out by the year's end.

Ukraine initially sent 1,650 troops to Iraq, becoming the fourth-largest contingent in the U.S.-led military operation, but the move was highly unpopular.

Also during the visit, Hrytsenko and Iraqi counterpart Saadoun al-Dulaimi signed an agreement to boost bilateral cooperation between the defense ministries, and discussed Ukraine's possible role in training Iraqi soldiers.

Source: AP

Bookmark and Share

Yushchenko to Meet Azeri President Soon

KIEV, Ukraine -- President Viktor Yushchenko may soon travel to Baku for oil and gas talks with his Azeri counterpart Ilkham Aliyev, who is facing a mounting international pressure over apparently undemocratic parliamentary election Sunday.

President of Azerbaijan Ilkham Aliyev (R) met with his counterpart Viktor Yuschenko on June 16, 2005 in Kiev

The visit is being prepared and will probably take place in the second half of November, Taliat Aliyev, the Azeri ambassador to Ukraine, said at a press conference Monday.

Yushchenko’s trip will come at a sensitive time as tensions have been increasing between Kiev and Baku over deportation of 16 Ukrainian youth activists from Azerbaijan on Sunday.

The Azeri government fears the Ukrainians may have been preparing to help Azeri opposition groups to kickstart street protests over suspected election fraud. The groups announced Monday the protests will be delayed by one day and will start on Nov. 9.

The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe and the U.S. have raised their concerns Monday over the way the election had been handled by the Azeri authorities.

A $1.5-million exit poll, funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development, found that the election may have been manipulated in at least nine election constituencies out of 46 checked by the pollsters.

Results in another 19 constituencies are being processed by the pollsters and will be released soon, officials said. There are a total of 125 election constituencies in the Azerbaijan.

Ilkham Aliyev’s party, Yeni Azerbaijan Party (YAP), has won at least 64 constituencies, the Central Elections Commission announced Monday after having counted about 90% of ballots. The commission already suggested it would be ready to re-run the election in 10 unidentified constituencies.

Yushchenko, who swept to power following the last year’s Orange Revolution, a popular uprising against the election fraud, has repeatedly declared that he will work to help spread democracy in the former Soviet Union.

But the visit also underscores an importance that Azerbaijan plays in Ukraine’s energy diversification strategy.

Azerbaijan has been promising to supply at least 2 million metric tons of crude oil annually via Ukrainian oil pipeline, Odessa-Brody, to the European Union, undercutting the Russian oil supplies.

Azerbaijan can also play an important role in building a natural gas pipeline across the Caspian Sea from Turkmenistan to Ukraine that would bypass Russia, analysts said.

But the potential election turmoil in Azerbaijan may alter these plans as Russia has been scrambling to help Aliyev to prevent the revolution.

Russian election observers, led by Vladimir Rushaylo, an aide to Russian President Vladimir Putin, said the Sunday the elections were in line with democratic principles.

The comments again pitch Russia against the West in describing the election results, a year after similar standoff between Russia and the West over the election in Ukraine.

Source: Ukrainian Journal

Bookmark and Share

Azerbaijan's Envoy To Ukraine Justifies Ban On Election Observers

KIEV, Ukraine -- Baku's ambassador to Ukraine, Taliyat Aliyev, today accused the Ukrainian youth movement Pora of supporting Azerbaijanis seeking to organize "public disorders" in Azerbaijan.

Azeri opposition leaders Ali Kerimli (L), Sardar Dzhalaloglu (C) and Isa Gambar (R) speak during a news conference in the oppostion's head quarter in Baku November 7, 2005. Azerbaijan's parliamentary election did not meet international standards for democracy, Western observers said on Monday, as the defeated opposition prepared mass protests against what it said was widespread fraud.

Aliyev was commenting at a press conference in Kyiv. He justified the decision by Azerbaijani authorities to deny entry to a group of Ukrainian observers of Sunday's parliamentary elections.

"Does a person who is coming to observe elections have the right to bring along 13 students to Azerbaijan with flags and T-shirts of your Pora civic organization?" Aliyev said.

"We are already aware of Pora's actions in Azerbaijan -- they have sent packages of T-shirts, ties, and other paraphernalia to certain individuals to help them organize public disorders in Azerbaijan. Naturally, such people could not be allowed into Azerbaijan."

Ukraine's Foreign Ministry earlier criticized the entry ban, and demanded an explanation. Ministry spokesman Vasyl Filipchuk said the incident "spoils the atmosphere for the development of friendly bilateral relations" between Ukraine and Azerbaijan.

Source: Radio Free Europe

Bookmark and Share

Monday, November 07, 2005

Yushchenko Changes Prosecutors

KIEV, Ukraine -- Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko has replaced Prosecutor-General Sviatoslav Piskun with Oleksandr Medvedko. Piskun was too close to former prime minister Yulia Tymoshenko, who is set to be Yushchenko's most dangerous rival in the parliamentary election next March.

Furthermore, Piskun failed to solve a single major crime ascribed to the regime of former president Leonid Kuchma. Piskun's successor, Medvedko, may be the ideal choice for Yushchenko at the moment. He is ostensibly apolitical. Also, he worked in Donetsk Region for 20 years, so he may be privy to many secrets of the "Donetsk clan," which has been a hard nut to crack for Kyiv investigators since the Orange Revolution.

Yushchenko fired Piskun on October 14, then on October 26, Piskun sued Yushchenko hoping that the courts would reinstate him. There had been a precedent: during the Orange Revolution last year, a court in Kyiv ruled that then-President Leonid Kuchma had dismissed Piskun illegally in 2003, and Piskun triumphantly returned to the Prosecutor-General's Office, which he had headed in 2002-2003.

But Ukrainian courts are often guided by political necessity rather than precedent, and it is the president's constitutional right to dismiss the top prosecutor. Piskun's chances of returning to the Prosecutor-General's Office look pretty slim.

On October 31 Yushchenko asked parliament to approve Medvedko as new prosecutor-general, which it did on November 3, by 303 ballots, far more than the 226 needed. Five out of the Ukrainian parliament's 15 factions refused to back Medvedko.

The Yulia Tymoshenko Bloc was expected to disapprove of Medvedko, as Tymoshenko disagreed with Piskun's dismissal from the start, and apparently still hopes for his reinstatement. Her bloc's allies -- United Ukraine and Reforms and Order -- predictably supported her.

The otherwise pro-Yushchenko Ukrainian People's Party refused to back Medvedko because, according to the influential Zerkalo nedeli, they took offense at Yushchenko for not picking their man -- Volodymyr Moysyk -- for prosecutor-general, as Yushchenko had initially planned.

And the Socialists said they did not back Medvedko because they were not convinced by his previous performance. Medvedko reportedly took part in investigating several sensational murders, including those of Donetsk MP Yevhen Shcherban in 1996, former central bank chairman Vadym Hetman in 1998, Kyiv journalist Heorhiy Gongadze in 2000, and Donetsk journalist Ihor Alexandrov in 2001.

None of those crimes has been properly solved.

Medvedko's participation in the investigation into Alexandrov's murder is his weakest point. Segodnya has quoted Henadiy Vasylyev, who was prosecutor-general in 2003-2004, as saying that he dismissed Medvedko from the post of deputy prosecutor-general in 2003 for botching that investigation.

And the muckraking Obkom website claimed that Medvedko was the author of a theory that initially led the Alexandrov case nowhere; a vagrant was indicted, later found innocent, and then died under mysterious circumstances. Eventually a Donetsk Region-based businessman with criminal links was charged with commissioning Alexandrov's assassination.

But Yushchenko pins his hopes on Medvedko. Meeting him after the voting in parliament, Yushchenko instructed Medvedko to properly investigate the Gongadze murder and to look into the allegations of vote rigging during last year's presidential election. He also asked Medvedko to scrupulously investigate his own September 2004 poisoning, which is still a puzzle.

Unlike Potebenko -- and Medvedko apparently positions himself as his polar opposite -- Medvedko does not hurry with promises. Meeting parliamentary faction leaders prior to the voting, he cautiously remarked that the Prosecutor-General's Office would do what is needed to solve high-profile cases within a legal framework.

Asked about the Gongadze case, which Piskun had pledged to solve quickly, Medvedko limited himself to saying he "very much hopes for a positive result." What Medvedko has promised is being apolitical, impartial, and restrained in public statements, qualities that Piskun lacked. The Prosecutor-General's Office "should not share its theories with the public; instead, it should inform the public about results," Proua website quoted Medvedko as telling the deputies.

It may not be easy for Medvedko to be apolitical. Too many factors link him to Donetsk, which is home to Yushchenko's key political opponents -- the Party of Regions of his election rival Viktor Yanukovych. Medvedko worked in top prosecutorial positions in Donetsk and neighboring Luhansk from 1980 till 2002, when Piskun picked him for the post of his deputy.

To all appearances, the Donetsk team does not particularly like Medvedko, who must have been a first-hand witness to the emergence of the "Donetsk clan." In 2003, Prosecutor-General Vasylyev, who used to be Donetsk chief prosecutor, fired him from the Prosecutor-General's Office. And the Regions parliamentary faction did not want to vote in Medvedko's favor till the very last moment.

They changed their minds, reportedly, after they were promised some concessions, and when it became clear that Medvedko would be approved anyway. It remains to be seen what those concession are.

Source: Eurasia Daily Monitor

Bookmark and Share

Ukraine: Contradictions and Opportunities

BUDAPEST, Hungary -- How long will droves of foreign investors continue to avoid Ukraine, a country whose 48 million residents and fast growth could make it the next Hungary, Czech Republic, Slovakia and Romania all rolled into one?


At a guess, for just as long as Ukraine’s political and business environments continue to be plagued by intricate webs of contradiction, and politics and business remain so closely linked as to be indistinguishable.

That may seem a perverse view after the privatisation two weeks ago of the country’s biggest industrial asset. The auction of steel mill Kryvorizhstal not only fetched a record USD 4.8 billion (EUR 4 billion) from Indian-owned winner Mittal Steel, but seemed a model of transparency, being ostentatiously broadcast live on national television. Indeed, although Ukraine first embarked on a fitful series of state asset sales in 1992, many people consider this tender - the second time Kryvorizhstal has been sold - to be the first fair and free privatisation.

But as the bidders sat there, raising the stakes ever higher before an expectant nation, heroically-scarred President Viktor Yushchenko was nowhere to be seen. He arrived late for the event and watched from a backroom.

Instead, sitting near the bidders, and the first to congratulate the victors, was the golden-braided figure of Yulia Tymoshenko. Sacked as prime minister, she holds no official post, but somehow bluffed her way into the auction room to claim the result as a personal triumph - and a trophy for her next election campaign.

Curiouser and Curiouser

The Kryvorizhstal sale fulfils a promise Yushchenko made when running for president late last year, part of a campaign to rid Ukraine of its corrupt image.

Over the years, weak governments had awarded many privatisations to a handful of local tycoons who carved up the country’s main industries between them. Seeing little need to make technological upgrades, with labour costs a fraction of those in the EU, the oligarchs kept production running as it was and skimmed off the profit, much of it landing offshore.

Yushchenko pledged to revise privatisations and, if they were found irregular, to re-nationalise and re-sell the assets.

Opinions differ as to whether this pledge was a positive or a negative sign to investors. It sparked attention, but the suggestion that the present government does not believe in property protection, nor recognise contracts signed by previous administrations unsettled many businesspeople. When Yushchenko fired Tymoshenko as premier in September, it was precisely because of her excessive zeal over re-privatisation. It has been assumed that her replacement, Yury Yekhanurov, would finish the resale of Kryvorizhstal but leave other privatisations alone, in the interest of stability.

But no one was expecting Kryvorizhstal to fetch USD 4.8 billion, a full USD 4 billion more than when President Leonid Kuchma sold it to oligarchs Renat Akhmetov and Viktor Pinchuk (the latter his son-in-law) in 2004.

That sum removes any budgetary pressure to re-sell more major assets. But politically, the high price increases the pressure on the government to conduct more re-privatisations.

Tymoshenko is triumphant about the extraordinary revenue and is calling on the government to re-sell other companies. This is likely to be her rallying cry as she seeks to regain power in next March’s parliamentary elections.

Going straight

Another landmark foreign investment deal in recent months came when Raiffeisen Bank bought the country’s second biggest financial institution, Aval Bank, for what some consider an exaggerated EUR 1 billion. Though the Austrian bank was already present in Ukraine, the deal increased its visibility.

Some international banks, such as Sweden’s SEB and Poland’s Pekao, had made purchases before that and more are expected. It is thought that much of the banking sector, overdue for consolidation, will be bought out by professional investors within the next year, providing an economic backbone that could encourage M&A in other industries. However, many investors are awaiting the result of next March’s elections.

Other factors inhibiting investment in Ukraine are lack of transparency and confusing laws.

Here, matters are improving. But this is not so much thanks to lobbying by foreign investors as due to local tycoons being at a certain stage of maturity. Having carved up the economy, they need laws on land ownership, commercial transactions, anti-trust and the like, so they can protect their investments and develop their businesses. The government has acquiesced.

And as local companies increasingly tap international bond markets for financing, they show a pragmatic interest in declaring results according to international accounting standards - contributing to overall transparency.

Trust the Slavs

Ukraine remains a Ukrainian’s market, where foreigners tread with caution. Yet in another sense, foreign investment is happening all the time.

For one thing, never forget the risk-tolerant Russians. Rarely harping on about due diligence and the rule of law, they instinctively understand Ukraine, and have pumped millions of dollars into it. Much of this money - if it registers in official statistics at all - shows up as coming from Cyprus or the British Virgin Islands.

Another trend in Ukraine is for an initial investment in a business - privatised or greenfield - to be made by a local entity, and a strategic foreign partner to come on board a few years later. Less headline-hogging than M&A, such processes allow the local entrepreneur to take the initial risk, and the foreign partner to bring in know-how once the difficult years are through.

Local business watchers see this scenario playing out with increasing regularity, at grassroots level. On a larger scale, one of the country’s dozen or so fertiliser makers operates as a Ukrainian-US joint venture.

Perhaps, a few years from now, all the major industrial producers will be in joint ventures with foreign partners bringing in money and expertise. And that will make re-privatisation an irrelevant question.

Source: The Budapest Times

Bookmark and Share

"Long Live Lenin" - Thousands of Communists March in Ukraine

KIEV, Ukraine -- Tens of thousands of Communists and their allies demonstrated in Ukraine on Monday to mark the 88th anniversary their party's taking control of the Soviet Union.


More than ten thousand marchers had gathered in the centre of the Ukrainian capital Kiev by midday. Police presence was moderate and no incidents of violence had been reported.

The mostly retirement-age crowd carried banners and signs saying, among others, "The real revolution is ahead!" "Ukraine is not a product for sale!", and "Long live Lenin!"

The demonstrators also displayed their opposition to Ukraine's current pro-European government with placards stating "You in power are there only temporarily!", "Capitalists out!"; and by chanting "Down with (Ukrainian President Viktor) Yushchenko!"

Police also were present in a defensive ring around the controversial Lenin statue in downtown Kiev, which according to Communists had been targeted for defacement by underground nationalist groups on Monday.

Pedestrian traffic near the Lenin statue on Monday was moving normally and, aside from about a dozen Communists in the vicinity, no one appeared to be paying attention to the statue.

A smaller demonstration of 1,000 members gathered in a main square of the Black Sea port city Odessa, the Interfax news agency reported.

Source: DPA

Bookmark and Share

Yushchenko to Decide Soon Whether to Lead His Party in March Election

KIEV, Ukraine -- President Viktor Yushchenko said Sunday he will decide in a week whether to formally lead his party, Our Ukraine, in the March 2006 parliamentary election, an option that may greatly boost the party’s rating.

Viktor Yushchenko at a Our Ukraine congress

Our Ukraine, when formally led by Yushchenko, enjoys support of between 17% and 20% of respondents and has a potential of winning the vote, several opinion polls have indicated.

The same party, but led by Deputy Prime Minister Roman Bezsmertniy, Yushchenko’s ally, enjoys support of between 5% and 10%, and could finish the No. 3 in the race, the polls suggested.

Yushchenko’s decision is eagerly watched by analysts as it may define the shape of the future government. The winning party for the first time will be able to claim the post of the prime minister, whose powers will dramatically expand after Jan. 1, 2006.

“If my presence in a trench will contribute to forming [democratic] values, then I will be in this trench,” Yushchenko said.

The comments signal that Yushchenko may re-consider the issue after suggesting last month that he had decided not to lead the party. Yushchenko has said he’s not the president of a certain party, but the president of the country.

The decision to lead the party will most likely be heavily criticized by two strongest opposition groups, one led by former Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych and another led by former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko.

Both groups, which currently enjoy support of between 17% and 20%, would have a clear edge over Bezsmertniy-led Our Ukraine and could result in either Yanukovych or Tymoshenko getting the prime minister post after the vote. Yushchenko’s leading the party would seriously alter those plans, reduce their powers and would probably trigger heavy criticism from them.

“I will consider this issue no matter how many bullets or accusations are fired on me,” Yushchenko said. “Democracy, the rule of law and freedom must return to this country forever. These are not the empty values for me and I know that based on these values this country will be eternal.”

Should Yushchenko’s Our Ukraine win the election, it would probably lead to business-friendly Prime Minister Yuriy Yekhanurov, Yushchenko’s ally, retaining the post for five years.

Source: Ukrainian Journal

Bookmark and Share

Azeri Opposition Calls for Street Protests Against 'Rigged' Election

BAKU, Azerbaijan -- Oil-rich Azerbaijan appeared to be slipping into a political crisis after pro-democracy activists keen on engineering a Ukraine-style orange revolution accused the government of rigging parliamentary elections, setting the stage for mass public protests and possible violence.

Isa Gambar, leader of opposition party Musavat (or Equality), looks on during a news conference in Baku. Azerbaijan's ruling party, Yeni Azerbaijan Party, claimed victory in Sunday's parliamentary election but was immediately accused of widespread fraud by the opposition which said it would hit the streets in protest

President Ilham Aliyev looked set for victory last night, with an exit poll projecting Yeni Azerbaijan with 56 seats, down from 75. The exit poll also showed the main Azadliq (Freedom) coalition of opposition parties receiving 12 seats. Independents and minor parties, most of them government allies, won the rest.

But the opposition dismissed claims by President Aliyev that yesterday's vote had gone smoothly and said it had evidence of 21,104 voting irregularities in 113 of the country's 125 constituencies.

Ali Kerimli, the leader of the opposition Popular Front party, said: " This election did not reflect the will of the Azeri people. It was totally falsified. Now we will start the constitutional non-violent struggle for the invalidation of these elections."

The opposition promised to organise large public rallies in Baku, the capital, tomorrow, Wednesday and Thursday. However it has yet to receive official permission for such demonstrations and in the past the government has dispersed any unsanctioned rallies with brutal force.

The Interior Minister, Ramil Usubov, said police would intervene if the opposition tried to hold protests without getting official approval ­ which is often withheld. "We have information that the opposition ... is preparing provocation," said Mr Usubov. "We will intervene decisively to stop all attempts to disrupt public order."

Azadliq insisted it had a strong case for demonstrations. It said a 21,000-strong army of observers had witnessed more than 1,500 instances of local authorities instructing voters to support pro-government candidates and almost 1,300 examples of ballot stuffing and claimed that a new anti-fraud system to ink voters' thumbs with ultra-violet markings had been abused on more than 1,700 occasions. "These were the most falsified elections in Azeri history," claimed Panakh Guseinov, Azadliq's campaign manager.

Ballot boxes had been moved from place to place or stolen, Azadliq said, and there were almost 300 cases where policemen had intervened to obstruct the electoral process. At least one opposition candidate was reportedly arrested along with several activists.

Mr Aliyev insisted the polls were free and fair. "The campaign was successful. Equal conditions were created for all candidates and that gives me hope," he said as he cast his own vote in a Baku school.

In a sign that he concedes democracy in his country of eight million Muslims still has some way to go, he expressed hope that the elections would allow Azerbaijan to make more democratic reforms.

The executive secretary of the ruling party, Ali Akhmadov, echoed Mr Aliyev's words and predicted an overwhelming government victory.

He pronounced the elections "transparent, just and democratic" and said that violations were minor and not enough to affect the results.

The opposition's allegations of fraud meant, he said, "that they acknowledge their own defeat and are now trying to blacken the election" .

At school number 47 in a northern suburb of Baku, where one of the opposition's three main leaders was standing, voters filed past an enormous portrait of Mr Aliyev and his late father, Heydar, providing them with a powerful reminder of the father and son dynasty that has held power here for most of the past three decades.

Rafiq Allakhverdiev, 23, who works in a local entertainment complex, said that he voted for Isa Gambar, the opposition leader in question, but said he was sceptical that his vote really counted. "I don't believe the opposition will be allowed to win. We can only hope for support from foreign countries. Our own people are too afraid."

Like many people who said they had voted for the opposition, he admitted he would be unwilling to take part in street protests because he feared police violence.

Salehov Missaleh, 23, who is unemployed, and also voted for Mr Gambar, expressed similar sentiments.

"The authorities have been in power for many years but we haven't seen any changes. We are four brothers in my family and we are all unemployed." More than 40 per cent of the Azeri population lives below the poverty line.

Source: Independent Online

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, November 06, 2005

Leaders of Ukraine's 'Orange Revolution' Detained

BAKU, Azerbaijan -- On the eve of a key parliamentary election Azerbaijan yesterday detained visiting leaders of Ukraine's "Orange Revolution" who had planned to monitor the vote.

Azeri women look at tha party candidates list at a polling station in Baku. Foreign observers, invisible ink and transparent ballot boxes were all in place as the parliamentary vote got under way Sunday

A leader of Ukraine's Pora (It's Time) youth movement, which played an important role in toppling an entrenched regime in Ukraine last year, said a group of 16 Ukrainians who flew from Kiev to monitor the poll were being held in Baku's international airport.

"They told us we are unwanted in Azerbaijan," said Yevgeny Zolotaryov, the movement's deputy head, adding that officials had confiscated their passports and were refusing to allow them to pass through passport control.

The Ukrainians, who under Azerbaijani law are not required to obtain visas to enter the country, were not given the opportunity to contact the Ukrainian embassy in Baku, Zolotaryov said.

Azerbaijani border officials were not immediately available for comment.

Over 1,500 international election observers have converged on Azerbaijan to monitor today's vote, seen as test of democracy in this oil-rich republic where Western firms have invested billions of dollars.

Corruption-ridden Azerbaijan has a history of stolen elections and observers fear today's vote could turn into a repeat of 2003 presidential elections which were marred by fraud and resulted in violent dispersals of protests.

The authorities, fearful of a peaceful revolt like the one that swept Ukraine, have cracked down on the opposition.

Source: AFP

Bookmark and Share

Year After 'Orange Revolution', a Tired, Bitter But Determined Yushchenko

KIEV, Ukraine -- A year after the "orange revolution" that swept him to power, Ukraine's President Viktor Yushchenko is visibly tired, bitter about his shattered revolutionary team, and as determined as ever to lead the ex-Soviet nation on a pro-Western course.

President Viktor Yushchenko a year after the "Orange Revolution"

In an interview with AFP in his spacious office overlooked by a large icon above his desk, the Ukrainian leader reflected on a tumultuous year that began with breathtaking images of peaceful "people power" and ended with bitter infighting and recriminations amid the dream team that led the revolt.

The president, under fire at home over the past several months, was a much more subdued figure than candidate Yushchenko, whose final election victory an adoring press corps greeted with applause and who often smiled and joked when he spoke with reporters.

"I think that in many ways, I have become much more restrained," Yushchenko said, his onetime movie star-handsome face still bearing the ravages of a yet unsolved poisoning. "Maybe I have become less compromising and from that harder, although that's not my style."

His biggest regret during the past year was the break with his "orange revolution" partner Yulia Tymoshenko, whom he fired as prime minister in September.

"The bets were placed on the wrong horses," he said. "People who were very important figures in the 'orange revolution' ... from heroes turned into ordinary people."

"After such a beautiful victory it turned out that a large portion of the team that stood by me did not find mutual understanding once in official posts. That is their personal fault because ... personal ambitions started to come into play."

"If I knew that about some of them 15 months ago, I would have done things differently ... including in appointments."

Yushchenko admitted that the infighting among people he appointed to top posts came at a high cost -- among foreign investors, whom he has been trying to attract to the country but who have largely stayed away because of the government's aggressive stance on reprivatization; and amid Ukraine's voters, many of whom were shocked by the team breakup and who will elect a new, much more powerful parliament next March.

"We lost lots of time."

But he defended the changes that have taken place in a country since his inauguration in late January.

"First and foremost is freedom -- freedom of press, freedom of political competition," he said. "The (public) dialogue that we have today would have been unthinkable 15 months ago. Unthinkable. Nobody would have been allowed in here," he said, gesturing around his office.

Investor sentiment was bound to change after the repeat privatization of the nation's steel giant, Kryvorizhstal, which was sold to the world's top steel producer, Mittal Steel, for a record 4.8 billion dollars during an auction televised live.

"I think that the Kryvorizhstal privatization is a good example of the fact that practices and procedures change and our friends in business should believe that the same has been accomplished in politics."

Yushchenko rejected criticism, often voiced in the domestic and foreign press, that his administration had not achieved concrete results on its top goal -- driving Ukraine toward European integration -- and that it was slowly inching back into Russia's traditional sphere of influence.

"We have been received in Europe. We have held new rounds of talks with practically all the leading countries in Europe."

"In a few weeks, Ukraine and the EU will sit down in Kiev" during a summit. "I don't think that anyone would have come here a year ago ... Today people are starting to come here."

"With Russia, we changed the format of our relations ... and have raised what may be uncomfortable questions ... (including) the demarcation of borders, the Black Sea Fleet."

"I think that we have found quite wise answers in terms of our integration both to the east and the west."

Source: AFP

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, November 05, 2005

Echoes from a Past Revolution

ST. PETERSBURG, Russia -- This year, the Ukrainian mass-media have devoted a lot of air time and print to a string of events that occurred a century earlier in the Russian empire: the massacre of protesting workers near the Czar's Winter Palace in St. Petersburg; the Potemkin mutiny in Odessa and other clashes between the proletariat and the Czarist regime, which in sum served as a dress rehearsal for the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution.


On 9 January 1905 (Gregorian calendar), a peaceful procession of St. Petersburg workers was fired on by the police and Cossack units as they were delivering a petition to Nicholas II. They were led by an Orthodox priest named Georgy Gapon. The list of demands included eight-hour working days, better working conditions, higher salaries, universal suffrage and an end to the Russo-Japanese War. Whoever gave the order, over 100 men, woman and children, some carrying icons and the Czar's portrait, were killed. Around 300 others were wounded. This tragic day, which has since been known as Bloody Sunday, led to factory strikes, university walkouts and unrest that engulfed the whole country.

People's indignation had been accumulating for years, but the workers, peasants, students and soldiers who attempted spontaneous protests were either executed, imprisoned, banished to Siberia or frightened into submission.

The police apparently attacked the peaceful demonstration in the hope of intimidating other potential protestors and would-be rebels. Some say Gapon was an agent provocateur. But the result was the opposite. Russia erupted in social and political upheaval. Ukraine was also particularly hard hit. Here the Ukrainian language was banned and ethnic discrimination thrived. Ukrainians at the time were officially known as Little Russians, or derisively called khokhols. The country's significant Jewish population had to obey draconian and humiliating rules.

Millions of peasants took part in rebellions throughout the vast empire. They destroyed their landlords' mansions and palaces, cut down their forests and slaughtered their cattle and pigs. By the way, during all the revolutions that Ukraine went through, the worst casualties were noted among cows and pigs. This was especially true after the 1917 revolution, during the years of forced collectivization. Live stock figures dropped again between 1996 and 2005, after the implementation of land reform. In the past five years, the number of cows and pigs in the country has been halved, while our forests have been decimated at a catastrophic speed. The harm is the greater, as Ukraine has fewer forests than any other European country. Thus, the loss of livestock and woods appear to be the price our nation pays for social conflicts. Even today, villagers in any part of Ukraine can show you glades where landowners' forests once grew.

My own family knows many stories about the injustice and arbitrariness of landowners and Czarist officials. Most of the peasants from our village did not have their own fields to cultivate, so they had to labor for the local lord to earn a little money. My father's elder brother offered his services as a cattle grazer for the promise of getting a calf in autumn. His family hoped they would be able to raise this calf to one day feed themselves. However, revolution broke out, and the peasants led off all the landowners' cattle. My uncle managed to hold on to the calf he'd been promised.

But a few weeks later, the landlord came back to the village accompanied by Czarist troops. The village priest and constable organized public punishments in the local square. The villagers were forced to give back what they had stolen and then mercilessly whipped with the rifle ramrods provided by the soldiers. The landlord also demanded that the calf be returned. When my uncle's mother protested, she was given 25 lashes. They stripped her publicly and delivered the blows in front of her family and neighbors. She remembered the humiliation and shame that she had been subject to right up to her deathbed. It was the public dishonor rather than the blows themselves that still made her weep. It's no surprise then that three of her four sons, who had witnessed the punishment, joined the Bolsheviks against the Czar.

It was uprisings in the army and navy that presented the biggest threat to the Czarist regime. In Kyiv, one such armed revolt was headed by Borys Zhadanivsky. Memorials are erected in several Ukrainian cities to commemorate the courageous participants in these uprisings. The greatest mutiny broke out on the Battleship Potemkin. In June 1905, a group of sailors complained about the serving of rotten meat. The captain ordered that the ringleaders be shot. The firing squad refused to carry out the order and joined with the rest of the crew in throwing the officers overboard.

But sailors from other ships didn't follow suit. Eventually, the Potemkin sailed to Romania, where the mutineers surrendered to the local authorities. Nevertheless, the mutiny found a place in history. Sergey Eisenstein's Battleship Potemkin is still considered to be one of the great cinematic achievements of all times.

Next, in December that year, came the rebellion by urban workers in Moscow's Presnya district. To extinguish the revolutionary flame, the regime had to make concessions. The Czar signed a decree granting more civil liberties; however, the revolutionaries were defeated because their uprising was local, largely spontaneous and not centrally coordinated by any single political force. Thirty thousand rebels were arrested by police. Five thousand of them were executed. The civil liberties that the Czar had guaranteed did little to stop police persecution and torture. But the people's yearning for change was not to be subdued.

The event allowed Russia's democratic forces to draw several conclusions about the doomed Russian autocracy and its inevitable downfall. They realized that the defeat of revolution was temporary and that a second wave of uprisings was imminent. They only had to organize rebels better to ensure victory. Historians of that time claim that the Czar knew a second phase of revolution was coming but could not change the system in time. So in 1917, Nicholas II abdicated without any resistance, turning over his powers to a provisional democratic government, which would in turn relinquish power to Lenin's radical adherents.

Today, we can calmly look back on the 20th century and analyze its upheavals. The first conclusion that we can make is that revolutions are recurrent. We should not regard them as final and decisive deliverance from dogmatism, stagnation, injustice and tyranny. After each revolution, social 'dirt' begins to accumulate again, leading to new rebellions.

In many parts of the world, people have managed to avoid revolutions, introducing improvements into state and social institutions gradually. To do this, a society has to be stable and democratic, with an efficient and publicly responsible government. In authoritarian or totalitarian countries, where dictators rule, there are no such conditions, so social, political, religious and other explosive upheavals are inevitable.

Luckily, in Ukraine and Georgia recent change has been peaceful and non-violent. The people swept away their hated regimes through organized demonstrations rather than arms. Such scenarios could be repeated in other post-Soviet republics where democracy - the decisive pre-condition for self-improvement and permanent social rejuvenation - is oppressed. If Czar Nicholas II had at least started to democratically reform his empire, he may have avoided revolution. However, his and other monarchists' desire to hold on to power eventually led to their tragic loss of it.

Source: Ukrainian Observer

Bookmark and Share

Soviet Secret Police Tricked British Spy Into a Trap 80 Years Ago

ST. PETERSBURG, Russia -- November 5, 1925 is a memorable day for the national special services: this day British spy and adventurer Sidney Reilly ended his career. After the well-known "plot of ambassadors" failed in the Soviet Union in 1918, Sidney Reilly was outlawed, in other words he was sentenced to death sentence.

Sidney Reilly, the real-life James Bond, was born in Ukraine as Sigmund Rosenblum

But the spy managed to escape. It was just in seven years that Stalin's secret police OGPU officers managed to trick him into the Soviet Union and arrested. Historian Igor Pykhalov from St.Petersburg tells unknown details of the operation.

It is highly probable that Sidney Reilly was born March 24, 1874 in the Ukrainian city of Kherson while it is usually believed he was born in Odessa. His real name was Sigmund Rosenblum. His father Mark Rosenblum was a broker and afterwards worked as a ship agent. The name of the mother is unknown; she was a Russified Pole. The well-off family moved to Odessa soon after the future spy was born.

Reilly was a subject of the British crown and served in the MI-6 intelligence service. Even though Reilly wanted to be recognized by the British elite, the society still treated him cautiously. Being very ambitious, Reilly often embellished his biography. Some researchers state that he spoke seven languages, but in fact he spoke fluently only Russian and English and probably knew some German.

After a year of studied at the University of Novorossiisk, Sigmund Rosenblum left for London to continue studies. Then he married Irish Reilly Callaghan and took her first name as his last name because of its euphony.

A special operation The Trust was launched in the USSR to trick the British spy into returning to the Soviet Union. Leaders of the white emigration Baron Vrangel and General Kutepov, even though they lost the Civil War, still could not admit that majority of the Russian population supported Bolsheviks. They believed that some influential organization was working in the USSR to organize a coup d'etat.

In 1925, Reilly was in New York where he performed some commercial combinations. As soon as he learnt about The Trust, he immediately rushed into the trap that Bolsheviks laid out for him. First of all, he hated Bolsheviks and emphasized several times that overthrowing of the Soviet regime was the main goal of his life.

However, there were some other reasons. In 1921, Sidney Reilly assisted Boris Savinkov in organizing armed raids upon the territories of Belarus and Ukraine. Simultaneously, anti- revolts were expected to break out there and Reilly was to inform the MI-6 leaders about them.

But in fact, secret police officers managed to arrest the plotters and no revolts took place. That suggested to the British intelligence that Reilly was probably a double agent. And the spy himself believed that The Trust would rehabilitate him in the opinion of his bosses.

What is more, together with espionage Reilly also ran some business. But in 1925 his business was no success. Sidney Reilly wanted to find some money to "continue fighting the Bolshevik regime" and also put some of this money into his own pocket. At that period, the West was establishing economic contacts with Bolsheviks.

To learn more about activity of The Trust, Sidney Reilly crossed the Soviet-Finnish border. He believed there was no real danger for him in the USSR if The Trust was a really powerful organization. He thought the OGPU would all the same let him go if The Trust was just a hoax of the secret police.

When Sidney was detained, the OGPU leaders could not decide whether to arrest or to release him. After long debates it was decided to arrest the British spy, but no official statement of the arrest was made. The OGPU did not want to make the arrest public as it was believed that The Trust could be used in the future for other purposes.

At the same time, there was also no official report about Reilly's death. Probably, the OGPU gave Reilly a chance to get out from Russia alive. But to remain alive, the OGPU wanted Sidney Reilly inform the Soviet secret police about western special services agents working in the USSR and also act an informal intermediary between the Soviet Government and western corporations. Reilly accepted the conditions and wrote a letter to Dzerzhinsky on October 30 to confirm his consent. But some sources state that Stalin insisted that the death sentence passed on Reilly in 1918 must be executed.

Reilly spent 40 days in a Moscow prison. Within the period, Great Britain took almost no measures to release its citizen. British officials emphasized that it was Reilly's personal decision to go to the USSR and the authority was no longer responsible for his future.

Source: Pravda

Bookmark and Share

Orange Revolution Leaders Losing Trust

KIEV, Ukraine -- A new poll say Ukrainians are losing faith in the leaders of the so-called Orange Revolution.

Lytvyn (L), Yushchenko (C) and Yanukovych (R)

The poll, conducted by the independent Ukrainian Sociology Service, showed that parliamentary speaker Volodymyr Lytvyn is trusted by 36 percent of the respondents, President Viktor Yushchenko by 35 percent and Party of Regions leader Viktor Yanukovych by 31 percent of those who responded.

Prime Minister Yury Yekhanurov and National Security and Defense Council Secretary Anatoliy Kinakh enjoy a positive balance of people's trust, that is, more Ukrainians trust than mistrust them, Ukrainian Sociology Service head Oleksandr Vyshnyak told Interfax.

"If you take the level of absolute trust in the politicians who are going to lead election blocs or parties, Yanukovych tops this list with 14 percent," said Vyshnyak.

Source: UPI

Bookmark and Share

Factories, Funds Flow to Ukraine

KIEV, Ukraine -- Japanese companies, particularly automakers, are increasingly looking at Ukraine as both a manufacturing base and a market.


The growing attention is attributable largely to the improving investment environment led by the inauguration of a pro-Western government.

The size of its economy, the second-largest among the former Soviet republics after Russia, is also attractive to Japanese companies.

The Japan Association for Trade with Russia & Central-Eastern Europe, which consists of financial institutions, trading houses and manufacturers, sent its first mission to Ukraine in October.

The delegation was made up of about 30 participants, including Tasuku Takagaki, adviser to the Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi.

They were greeted by Prime Minister Yuriy Yehanurov, who said he hoped that Japanese businesses would increase their presence in his country.

Separately, President Viktor Yushchenko agreed with Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi to strengthen bilateral ties when he visited Japan in July.

Isuzu Motors Ltd., which already operates a bus production plant in Ukraine, plans to start truck assembly there.

The truck maker expects to use the country as a base for exports to former Soviet republics.

Nissan Motor Co., which set up a sales company in Ukraine in March, plans to begin selling its Infinity line of luxury passenger cars at the end of 2007.

Company officials said the country's economy is expected to expand.

Ukraine is becoming a key investment destination because the country is expected to join the World Trade Organization soon.

The country could also offer a springboard for neighboring markets, such as Poland, which has joined European Union.

Source: The Asahi Shimbun

Bookmark and Share

Friday, November 04, 2005

Ukraine Rada Rejects NATO Support Plan

KIEV, Ukraine -- Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko has received a stinging setback from his parliament on aiding NATO.


The Verkhovna Rada, or parliament, Wednesday voted down a government proposal to allow NATO transport aircraft to fly across its territory and use its bases in support of military operations around the world.

The measure needed to be approved by a clear majority -- 226 members out of the 450 in the chamber. But it fell 19 votes short with only 207.


The defeat was a major blow for the strongly pro-Western Yushchenko whose goal is to fully integrate Ukraine into U.S.-led NATO and the 25-nation European Union as quickly as possible.

And it revived the political fortunes of the former communists and their pro-Russian allies whom he defeated in the 2004-2005 presidential elections that marked Ukraine's democratic "Orange Revolution."

Ironically, the proposal had originally been negotiated by Yushchenko's more pro-Russian predecessor, President Leonid Kuchma.

Yushchenko, despite his recent dramatic election victory, is increasingly isolated in his pro-NATO policies in Ukraine.

Recent opinion polls show opposition is still strong in Ukraine, which was part of the Soviet Union until the collapse of communism in 1991.

Source: UPI

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, November 03, 2005

U.S Lawmakers Demand End to Curbs on Trade with Ukraine

WASHINGTON, DC -- A bipartisan group of House members demanded on Nov. 2 the repeal of Cold War-era legislation that prevents Ukraine from joining the World Trade Organization.

Rep. Curt Weldon

With Ukrainian Prime Minister Yuriy Yekhanurov at his side, Rep. Curt Weldon said the curbs on Ukrainian trade under the 1974 Jackson-Vanik amendment should be lifted immediately.

"It's time to elevate Ukraine out of Jackson-Vanik," said Weldon, who co-chairs a U.S.-Ukraine joint legislative group.

Yekhanurov said quick movement toward Ukraine's WTO membership was important because of Russia's interest in joining.

If Russia joins while the Ukraine bid lags behind, Moscow would use its influence to keep its western neighbor out, Yekhanurov said, speaking through an interpreter.

The Ukrainian leader spoke after a breakfast with about two dozen legislators who strongly support the country's pro-democracy "orange revolution."

Weldon said there is no reason for Ukraine to still be under Jackson-Vanik because neither the administration nor the Congress supports the status quo.

He said President George W. Bush expressed surprise not long ago that the Jackson-Vanik restriction still applied to Ukraine.

The amendment effectively denies unconditional normal trade relations to countries that had non-market economies and restricted emigration rights.

Its chief target was the Soviet Union, of which Ukraine was a republic.

Weldon said U.S. groups that once supported Jackson-Vanik now agree that it should no longer apply to Ukraine.

As examples, he mentioned the American Jewish Committee and the National Council on Soviet Jewry.

Rep. Joseph Crowley said that since Jackson-Vanik was adopted, "times have changed dramatically. It's time that our own laws catch up with these changes."

Later, after a meeting with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Yekhanurov told reporters that Ukraine's parliament needed to take steps to qualify for WTO membership.

He said he expressed hope to Rice that the administration would do what it can to promote Ukraine's accession.

Source: AP

Bookmark and Share

Ukrainian Taxi Drivers Clog Kiev Streets in Protest at Growing Gas Prices

KIEV, Ukraine -- About a thousand taxi drivers blocked the central street of Ukrainian capital Kiev protesting rising gas prices Thursday, Interfax reported. Up to 10,000 more angry drivers are expected to join in the action, the rally’s organizers say.

Taxi drivers block access to the administrative building of Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko during a protest in Kiev, November 3, 2005. The drivers staged protests throughout Ukraine to denounce high fuel prices and proposed new complex rules on registering their vehicles

Bankovskaya Street, which the drivers chose for the rally, is where the Presidential Secretariat and the Rada, Ukrainian Parliament, are located. The drivers would not allow officials to reach their work places, demanding a meeting with President Yushchenko.

If their demands are not met, the drivers said they would paralyze the whole city, as thousands more drivers are expected to arrive from all over Ukraine to join them.

Meanwhile, the taxi drivers’ trade union leaders have had a meeting with the head of the president’s central reception chamber Alexander Koval.

Source: MosNews